This story is inaccurate, as the Sahand is already launched, as the link
below clearly shows
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=648530961826003&set=a.648529195159513.1073741825.169376436408127&type=3&theater
Also with the situation in Syria, arms buildups in the UAE and Saudi
Arabia, this slow delelopment is disturbing.
Sun Sep 29, 2013 4:43
Navy Commander: Iran to Build Training Warship
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran plans to build a training warship named 'Khalij-e
Fars (Persian Gulf)' in the near future, Navy Commander Rear Admiral
Habibollah Sayyari announced on Sunday, adding that the country's
destroyer named 'Sahand' will also be launched next year.
"God willing, construction of Khalij-e Fars (training) warship will
start this year," Sayyari told FNA.
"Once this warship is built, the Islamic Republic will be the only
regional country which has this type of vessel," he added.
Elsewhere, Sayyari also announced that the country's Sahand destroyer
will be launched in the next Iranian year (to start on March 21).
Tehran launched an arms development program during the 1980-88 Iraqi
imposed war on Iran to compensate for a US weapons embargo. Since 1992,
Iran has produced its own tanks, armored personnel carriers, missiles
and fighter planes.
Yet, Iranian officials have always stressed that the country's military
and arms programs serve defensive purposes and should not be perceived
as a threat to any other country.
Iran in June launched its overhauled and modernized destroyer named
Bayandor in the Southern waters of the country in the presence of Army
Commander Major General Ataollah Salehi and Rear Admiral Sayyari.
Army officials said the Iranian Navy's power of safeguarding the
country's territorial waters as well as maintaining security in regional
and international waters will increase after the launch of Bayandor.
Overhauling the main engines, heat exchangers and fuel and oil systems
as well as optimizing the monitoring control systems are among the
measures adopted before launching the destroyer.
Navy experts have also mounted a fire control system for the destroyer's
weapons, a 76-mm and a 40-mm canons and a surface-to-surface Nour
(Light) missile system on the destroyer.
In May, Sayyari had declared that Iran can use the destroyer to carry
out missions in international waters in the future.
He said the destroyer is fitted with state-of-the-art equipment such as
missile, torpedo, artillery, sonar and other information and
communication systems.
In recent years, Iran has made great achievements in its defense sector
and attained self-sufficiency in producing essential military equipment
and systems.
Iran's first home-made destroyer, Jamaran, was launched in late February
2010. The Mowdge Class vessel has a displacement of around 14,000 tons
and is equipped with modern radars and electronic warfare capabilities
and is armed with a variety of anti-ship, surface-to-surface and
surface-to-air missiles.
Iranian defense ministry officials had said earlier that the third
generation of the home-made vessel, Jamaran-3 destroyer, will come into
operation by the end of the current Iranian year (March 21, 2013 - March
20, 2014).
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Major watson weirdness update
I learned of these events while returning from the un, and their timing and speakers got my attention.
The shatterzone event, which took place the day of the protest I called at the un, got my attention for it's timing as well as it's speaker and topic
http://watson.brown.edu/events/2013/omer-bartov-shatterzone-empires-coexistence-and-violence-german-habsburg-russian-and
The speaker is an excellent example of everything that is wrong with jews. Since the mid 1990's bartov had been hanging out at the same places I would on providence's east side, including sitting next to me at the computers at the Rochambeau library. He is one of the individuals responsible for spreading the rumor that I ama self-hating polish jew, and he copies me in using the term "Habsburg Empire" to describe the Ausro-Hungarian Empire and other lands the Habsburgs ruled. Essentially bartov's research had taken him into parts of the World where my family had lived, and where vital documents were either destroyed or vandalized, and he never achieved any prominence at watson/brown while I was there only after I left, which is one reason I have to take precautions when presenting any vital info on myself and my family.
Interestingly enough bartov appeared on a panel talk with hanan ashrawi
http://watson.brown.edu/events/2013/after-oslo-critical-conversations-palestineisrael
As I learned in April 2006 when dealing with her ashrawi, like other speakers, are elitist pawns who care neither about Palestine or israel, only what their backers want. Interestingly enough ashrawi gave a talk before at brown
http://watson.brown.edu/events/2013/hanan-ashrawi-oslo-process-versus-peace
Notice this event, like the others here and in contradiction to similar past events, was NOT open to the public. Clearly ashrawi's elitist controllers at shit u do not want people to know she is screwing the Palestinians over, as watson/brown have repeatedly made trouble for the Palestinians and those who deal with them, and ashrawi never addresses this.
Almost coincidentally my digicam went on the fritz as I was about to go out and photo/video the UFO's/strange weather that occur over the watson institute on the final friday of every September. Just the latest in the series of strangeness that occurs on that date every year and which has been occurring which I have documented since 2006.
The shatterzone event, which took place the day of the protest I called at the un, got my attention for it's timing as well as it's speaker and topic
http://watson.brown.edu/events/2013/omer-bartov-shatterzone-empires-coexistence-and-violence-german-habsburg-russian-and
The speaker is an excellent example of everything that is wrong with jews. Since the mid 1990's bartov had been hanging out at the same places I would on providence's east side, including sitting next to me at the computers at the Rochambeau library. He is one of the individuals responsible for spreading the rumor that I ama self-hating polish jew, and he copies me in using the term "Habsburg Empire" to describe the Ausro-Hungarian Empire and other lands the Habsburgs ruled. Essentially bartov's research had taken him into parts of the World where my family had lived, and where vital documents were either destroyed or vandalized, and he never achieved any prominence at watson/brown while I was there only after I left, which is one reason I have to take precautions when presenting any vital info on myself and my family.
Interestingly enough bartov appeared on a panel talk with hanan ashrawi
http://watson.brown.edu/events/2013/after-oslo-critical-conversations-palestineisrael
As I learned in April 2006 when dealing with her ashrawi, like other speakers, are elitist pawns who care neither about Palestine or israel, only what their backers want. Interestingly enough ashrawi gave a talk before at brown
http://watson.brown.edu/events/2013/hanan-ashrawi-oslo-process-versus-peace
Notice this event, like the others here and in contradiction to similar past events, was NOT open to the public. Clearly ashrawi's elitist controllers at shit u do not want people to know she is screwing the Palestinians over, as watson/brown have repeatedly made trouble for the Palestinians and those who deal with them, and ashrawi never addresses this.
Almost coincidentally my digicam went on the fritz as I was about to go out and photo/video the UFO's/strange weather that occur over the watson institute on the final friday of every September. Just the latest in the series of strangeness that occurs on that date every year and which has been occurring which I have documented since 2006.
Example of why Iranian/american reconciliation is not working
As long as propagandists like kinzer continue to butt into Iranian affairs there can be no reconciliation between Iran and ameirca.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/9/25/iran-rouhani-obamaarabspring.html
Notice by his words kinzer doesn't know what he is talking about.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/9/25/iran-rouhani-obamaarabspring.html
Notice by his words kinzer doesn't know what he is talking about.
Monday, September 16, 2013
New appointment for shamkhani
While I am grateful to Shamkhani for making me honorary Sipah Salar in 2005, I question his appointment by rowhani as secretary of the Supreme National Security Council. Clearly rowhani is up to something. PKZ Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:15 Rouhani Appoints Rear Admiral Shamkhani as SNSC Secretary TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian President Hassan Rouhani appointed former Defense Minister Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani as the Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council (SNSC). Shamkhani first served as the commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy. Later he commanded the Iranian Army's naval force in addition to the IRGC Navy. He then became Iran's defense minister from August 1997 to August 2005 in the government of President Mohammad Khatami. When Ahmadinejad ascended to power in 2005 Shamkhani was replaced with Mostafa Mohammad Najjar in the post. In the 2001 presidential election, Shamkhani ran for office. He is the director of the Iranian Armed Forces' Center for Strategic Studies and a military advisor to Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Shamkhani will replace Saeed Jalili who served as SNSC Secretary during President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's tenure and represented Iran in nuclear talks with the world powers. The SNSC is, of course, not anymore in charge of the talks after President Rouhani in a decree last week shifted the leading role in the talks with the Group 5+1 (the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany) to the Foreign Ministry. Yet, Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Marziyeh Afkham told FNA on Thursday that coordination for the Iran-powers talks will still be done by the SNSC, although the negotiations will be carried out by the foreign ministry. ©2013 Fars News Agency. All rights reserved
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
The rot that is the zobians and RI's armenians
Recently
I have been on the receiving end of legal harassment and slander from berge
zobian and his associates. The main
problem they have been causing is their false claim that I am prejudiced
against Armenians, and that I have hurt their business. The truth is that the problems started in
April 2010 when berge invited me to an Armenian genocide event, under the
pretext of trying to get me and leslie yeransian to reconcile. However berge used his son levon to pick a
fight with me, and I ended up beating up berge, levon, and 4 o their associates
before the police broke up the fight. No
charges were pressed against me as the police knew that berge and levon were
prejudiced against me as my father’s maternal grandfather served on the Ottoman
army and his service included participation in the Armenian massacres, and that
had they not invited me I never would have beat them up. Their bad behavior continued as they used
their association with leslie yeransian and her family to stalk me, including
raising money for businesses which I had dealt with and slandering me to those
businesses. Additionally, levon used his
position with the Armenian youth federation to slander me in Watertown, not
realizing I have family, including Armenian relatives on my paternal
grandfather’s side, who live in the area.
Despite
their claims of being successful businessmen levon is seeking employment, while
berge’s work with photography involves image manipulation. His art gallery business has been unable to
expand outside of providence, as his Newport location went under as many
Artists, dealers, and collectors felt uncomfortable with berge’s shakedown
tactics, as have many who have been to berge’s gallery z in providence, leaving
berge to wallow in providence with the rest of the artistic poseurs. Interestingly enough he claims to be from New
York, yet he makes no open business or other associations there, probably aware
that he is not welcome down there with the way he rolls, nor has he shown proof
where he is from originally, content to spew lies and half-truths about himself
and others, and complains everytime someone calls him out.
He is just another example of how
the Armenians of RI are little more than headlice, ie those who give Armenians a
bad name. Let’s take a look at some
prominent Armenians in RI. In the RI
judiciary we have the hag bedrosian, appointed as chief of the state’s family
court, someone who enjoy’s sentencing people to excessive jail time and fines,
who replaces her predecessor fatso jeremiah, who not only did the same but did
so to get kickbacks from the people who run facilities where kids are
imprisoned and housed just so they could receive money to keep them in
business, which was one major reason that RI dcyf was overburdened with cases. Additionally judge jeremiah was in trouble
for double dipping in pensions and has had to move because of threats from
families ruined because of him.
Also
politically prominent is snotty avedisian, who has invited businesses into
Warwick during his tenure as mayor, yet these businesses have done next to
nothing to increase employment, and warwick’s population has declined as a
result. Not to mention he has done
nothing to improve RIPTA since becoming a board member. This is mild compared to fellow area
businessman and politico aram garabedian.
This crook has hired ex convicts to work at his businesses then when
something happens automatically blames them whether it was their fault or
not. One reason the warwick mall, which
he owns, was seriously damaged by flooding was the result of disgruntled
employees who allowed the mall to get flooded as revenge for their comrades who
were wrongly convicted because of garabedian.
Such behavior has helped to prevent a revival of his political career
which went downhill after his loss to steve laffey in the 2002 Cranston mayoral
election, and it must be said that garabedian had a good reputation as a people’s
advocate before his 2002 loss.
Speaking
of dirty Armenian businesses look no further than alex and ani, which hawks
their third rate jewelry to people through aggressive advertising and cash
pissing at public events. Interestingly
enough their headquarters is located in Cranston directly under where puke
yeransian located his company firstcomp’s RI office from it’s Jefferson blvd
location. This is the same puke
yeransian who is no longer welcome at regency plaza apartments for inciting
passersby with inflammatory slurs, and who got his sister leslie a job at
rising medical solutions, where she has used her position to stalk people via
their medical records, as I can personally attest to.
Overall,
these Armenians in RI represent the very worst of their kind.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Attack on Syria considered despite Russian brokered weapons deal
That the american government can do this just shows they are a bunch of illegitimate warmongers. Remember bush invaded Iraq after rejecting an offer from Putin to remove Saddam Hussein.
Peter Khan
Kerry pushes Senate for Syria action
Putin says Russian proposal only possible if US rejects force, shortly after Kerry's call for action to the Senate.
Last Modified: 10 Sep 2013 17:47
John Kerry has reiterated his case for armed intervention in Syria, arguing that inaction would make the situation worse.
The US secretary of state spoke before the US Senate's Armed Services Committee on Tuesday, a day after the chamber decided to delay a vote on use of force, originally scheduled for Wednesday.
He told the committee that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had responded to calls for diplomacy with violence, and that it was the Syrian regime, not the US government, that had chosen the current situation.
Kerry also argued that not resolving to strike would result in "irreparable damage" to the prohibition on chemical weapons that has "protected American troops for centuries".
Shortly following this staunch argument, Russian president Vladimir Putin said the proposal for Syria to place its chemical weapons under international control "can work only if we hear that the American side and all those who support the United States in this sense reject the use of force."
During his address to the Senate, Kerry also said that lack of military intervention would "send a message to Iran of American weakness."
But he repeated President Barack Obama's desire for a diplomatic resolution. "President Obama's first priority throughout this process has been and is diplomacy," he said.
Shifting positions
Kerry's remarks come the day after Obama said he would consider a Russian diplomatic offer for Syria to give up its chemical weapons and that military strikes would "absolutely" be put on hold if that were to happen.
Obama made the statements late on Monday as the US Senate decided to delay its vote on military action - capping a day of shifting positions from within the administration and on Capitol Hill.
Since Russia's proposal that Syria hand over its chemical weapons to international control in order to avert airstrikes, the US has been seen as trying to walk a line between not ruling out a diplomatic solution to the conflict, while also leaving military intervention on the table.
US administration has said it would take a "hard look" at the proposal, but indicated that Syria would have to follow through with its acceptance of the proposal with concrete action.
US Congressman John Garamendi speaks to Al Jazeera
The current debate began with Secretery of State John Kerry saying, in response to a reporter's question, that there would be no need for military action if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad handed over his chemical weapons - an answer that was then presented by Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, as a workable plan.
The US administration at first stated that Kerry's response was only rhetorical, but within hours the president said in interviews with six US networks that a diplomatic solution should be sought.
Obama said on CNN that the Russian plan was "a potentially positive development", while on NBC he said it could be a "significant breakthrough".
He was also adamant that the offer would not have surfaced if "a credible threat of a military strike from the United States" had not been made.
He told PBS: "I have instructed John Kerry to talk directly to the Russians and run this to ground and if we can exhaust these diplomatic efforts and come up with a formula that gives the international community a verifiable enforceable mechanism to deal with these chemical weapons in Syria, then I'm all for it."
Obama also conceded that he may lose his campaign in Congress for authorisation.
"I wouldn't say I'm confident," he said.
Iran's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday said it supported the idea while Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, said he too welcomed it.
Peter Khan
Kerry pushes Senate for Syria action
Putin says Russian proposal only possible if US rejects force, shortly after Kerry's call for action to the Senate.
Last Modified: 10 Sep 2013 17:47
John Kerry has reiterated his case for armed intervention in Syria, arguing that inaction would make the situation worse.
The US secretary of state spoke before the US Senate's Armed Services Committee on Tuesday, a day after the chamber decided to delay a vote on use of force, originally scheduled for Wednesday.
He told the committee that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had responded to calls for diplomacy with violence, and that it was the Syrian regime, not the US government, that had chosen the current situation.
Kerry also argued that not resolving to strike would result in "irreparable damage" to the prohibition on chemical weapons that has "protected American troops for centuries".
Shortly following this staunch argument, Russian president Vladimir Putin said the proposal for Syria to place its chemical weapons under international control "can work only if we hear that the American side and all those who support the United States in this sense reject the use of force."
During his address to the Senate, Kerry also said that lack of military intervention would "send a message to Iran of American weakness."
But he repeated President Barack Obama's desire for a diplomatic resolution. "President Obama's first priority throughout this process has been and is diplomacy," he said.
Shifting positions
Kerry's remarks come the day after Obama said he would consider a Russian diplomatic offer for Syria to give up its chemical weapons and that military strikes would "absolutely" be put on hold if that were to happen.
Obama made the statements late on Monday as the US Senate decided to delay its vote on military action - capping a day of shifting positions from within the administration and on Capitol Hill.
Since Russia's proposal that Syria hand over its chemical weapons to international control in order to avert airstrikes, the US has been seen as trying to walk a line between not ruling out a diplomatic solution to the conflict, while also leaving military intervention on the table.
US administration has said it would take a "hard look" at the proposal, but indicated that Syria would have to follow through with its acceptance of the proposal with concrete action.
US Congressman John Garamendi speaks to Al Jazeera
The current debate began with Secretery of State John Kerry saying, in response to a reporter's question, that there would be no need for military action if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad handed over his chemical weapons - an answer that was then presented by Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, as a workable plan.
The US administration at first stated that Kerry's response was only rhetorical, but within hours the president said in interviews with six US networks that a diplomatic solution should be sought.
Obama said on CNN that the Russian plan was "a potentially positive development", while on NBC he said it could be a "significant breakthrough".
He was also adamant that the offer would not have surfaced if "a credible threat of a military strike from the United States" had not been made.
He told PBS: "I have instructed John Kerry to talk directly to the Russians and run this to ground and if we can exhaust these diplomatic efforts and come up with a formula that gives the international community a verifiable enforceable mechanism to deal with these chemical weapons in Syria, then I'm all for it."
Obama also conceded that he may lose his campaign in Congress for authorisation.
"I wouldn't say I'm confident," he said.
Iran's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday said it supported the idea while Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, said he too welcomed it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)