With all the focus on the negatives in Iran today people forget about some positives. Among those positives is that Zoroastrians have been getting better treatment in Iran and getting more attention, and more people are beginning to see the real ways of the pure faith of Zarathustra.
As I writhe this Ghambar has begun, when Zoroastrians avoid work and celebrate the dreations of Dadvah Ahura Mazda. Having spent much time in meditation I have noticed the demonstrators/rioters in Iran and their cia instigators have no respect for the pure faith. I have a strong sense that should they continue during Ghambar with their acts all will end terribly for the demonstrators/rioters in Iran.
Peter Khan
Monday, June 29, 2009
Kiram democracy
There is a country ruled by an often inept government that has an up and coming population of young people who are stupid and lazy and who decide to vent their frustration by agitating for anything they see as opposition, even if it is a foreign backed entity which has only destructive plans against them.
While the description at time of writing can easily apply to Iran and America , it also easily applies to Serbia , Ukraine , Georgia , Haiti , Liberia , Kyrgyzstan , and other countries where ameircan manipulation has been prominent in disrupting local governments to replace them with ones who will back American plans which ultimately weaken them. In each case uprisings were instigated, though recently in Iran unsuccessfully, in which people, particularly young stupid ones, rose up and got other disaffected groups to join them, causing the native government to panic and one which was even more incompetent to be ushered in. Often the fact that there was manipulation was obvious, but this was often ignored, and the stupid young people went ahead and did something stupid which ruined their lives.
In the most recent case, Iran , the foreign manipulation was more than obvious. The losing candidate in the presidential election, mousavi, was a longtime cia asset, involved in the Iran-contra scandal, and he courted Iran’s idiotic young so well that when he lost the election they rioted in support of him. Bear in mind that these same Iranian youth had spent years advocating against american/israeli invasion of Iran rioted in support of a candidate who was backed by the same people they had worked against. They were quick to accuse Ahmadinejad and khameni of rigging the election yet they made excuses to discount american/cia meddling in the election despite obvious evidence staring them in the face. After all, first dick holbrooke helped cause further instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, then dragged Iran into getting involved in their affairs, which only spread Iran’s resources thinner. Plus the threat of an israeli attack on Bushehr, Natanz, and other Iranian targets would keep Iran’s government on edge. And to add insult to injury reza pahlavi and other of his cia/sidney austin talab have been attending demos in support of the rioters, though previously they have avoided going to such events for years. Then again, seeing how many of those people putting on those demos recive funding from the american government it should come as no surprise they are american backed with american goals behind them.
Most important of all the riots would not have been possible without an up and coming population of stupid, lazy young people. Most of them have been exposed to western culture and have been deliberately been shown the glitzy side of it that they easily dismiss the fact that more human rights violations occur in the west, namely america, than anywhere else. Plus they complain all the time about Iran’s government, but they have done nothing to improve things in Iran they complain about. They are too lazy to take jobs in the government, military, or in essential commodities like food, finance, technology etc. where they can provide essential services to Iran’s people, develop outstanding careers or behaviors, and act in a way that Iran’s government will be dependent on them and will not attack them. Instead they waste their lives pissing cash on BMW’s, clothes from Chanel and gap, goofing off at shabeh jendeh parties, and blowing money at expensive colleges for degrees which are a symbol of connections rather knowledge. Such people can easily be seduced by corrupt governments.
The easiest way these people are seduced are with promises of freedom and democracy, yet they never take a look at what democracy has done. In principle democracy is the rule of the majority, however in every country in which democracy has taken hold, be it america, britain, france, etc a small group of people has been able to control a commodity, be it the media, weapons, money, food, etc to manipulate the masses to their will. Such has happened in america that elections have been rigged for decades and the people fall for it, thinking they have freedom and democracy, ie a system which they think they can control but do not. This method has helped groups of elitist gangsters take control in america and in the britsh commonwealth and has caused mass violations of people’s freedoms in those countries, yet the masses falsely think democracy can save them.
Furthermore, the memories and knowledge of the people rioting/demonstrating for democracy they forget or do not realize the consequences of their actions. Promises of democracy were made in Iran in 1978, which caused the current regime to be put in power in 1979, and now the same tactics that were used to put that regime in power then are being used now to attack it. Promises of democracy were made in Yugoslavia in the 1990’s to destroy that country and to overthrow Milosevic, and when subsequent political leaders in Serbia began behaving like Milosevic elections were manipulated with american backing to remove them. In Georgia the american government incited riots against Shevardnadze to get him to resign in favor of the candidate of their choice, who led Georgia into a disastrous war with Russia which america could not get involved in. In the Ukraine american backing of Yushchenko pressured his pro-Russian opponents to yield to him in an election, and now the Ukraine not only has more government problems but is economically weaker and more at the mercy of Russia. In Pakistan Musharraff was pressured to resign after american and british backed rioters took to the streets against him in the name of democracy, and now Pakistan is unstable with american military attacks occurring there regularly. People in Kyrgyzstan rioted in 2005 to pressure Akayev, who was anti-american, to resign in favor of Bakiyev, who now is taking the same stance as his predecessor. Haiti has seen two american invasions in two decades in order to push american democracy there by ousting popularly elected leaders, leaving the country a wasteland. Liberia was invaded by the bush administration to put the leader of america’s choice there ruining the country. Overall, democracy today is as much a form of dictatorship as nazism, fascism, marxism, and communism, and those who agitate for democracy do so like a blind man who desires a painting.
When people agitate for something they must think carefully about what they are agitating for. This is true in the case of democracy in a world with an ever increasing population of stupid, lazy young people who have no consideration of what makes the world around them the way it is. The more one takes a look at democracy one sees it is as evil as other competing ideologies and makes one want to say kiram democracy.
While the description at time of writing can easily apply to Iran and America , it also easily applies to Serbia , Ukraine , Georgia , Haiti , Liberia , Kyrgyzstan , and other countries where ameircan manipulation has been prominent in disrupting local governments to replace them with ones who will back American plans which ultimately weaken them. In each case uprisings were instigated, though recently in Iran unsuccessfully, in which people, particularly young stupid ones, rose up and got other disaffected groups to join them, causing the native government to panic and one which was even more incompetent to be ushered in. Often the fact that there was manipulation was obvious, but this was often ignored, and the stupid young people went ahead and did something stupid which ruined their lives.
In the most recent case, Iran , the foreign manipulation was more than obvious. The losing candidate in the presidential election, mousavi, was a longtime cia asset, involved in the Iran-contra scandal, and he courted Iran’s idiotic young so well that when he lost the election they rioted in support of him. Bear in mind that these same Iranian youth had spent years advocating against american/israeli invasion of Iran rioted in support of a candidate who was backed by the same people they had worked against. They were quick to accuse Ahmadinejad and khameni of rigging the election yet they made excuses to discount american/cia meddling in the election despite obvious evidence staring them in the face. After all, first dick holbrooke helped cause further instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, then dragged Iran into getting involved in their affairs, which only spread Iran’s resources thinner. Plus the threat of an israeli attack on Bushehr, Natanz, and other Iranian targets would keep Iran’s government on edge. And to add insult to injury reza pahlavi and other of his cia/sidney austin talab have been attending demos in support of the rioters, though previously they have avoided going to such events for years. Then again, seeing how many of those people putting on those demos recive funding from the american government it should come as no surprise they are american backed with american goals behind them.
Most important of all the riots would not have been possible without an up and coming population of stupid, lazy young people. Most of them have been exposed to western culture and have been deliberately been shown the glitzy side of it that they easily dismiss the fact that more human rights violations occur in the west, namely america, than anywhere else. Plus they complain all the time about Iran’s government, but they have done nothing to improve things in Iran they complain about. They are too lazy to take jobs in the government, military, or in essential commodities like food, finance, technology etc. where they can provide essential services to Iran’s people, develop outstanding careers or behaviors, and act in a way that Iran’s government will be dependent on them and will not attack them. Instead they waste their lives pissing cash on BMW’s, clothes from Chanel and gap, goofing off at shabeh jendeh parties, and blowing money at expensive colleges for degrees which are a symbol of connections rather knowledge. Such people can easily be seduced by corrupt governments.
The easiest way these people are seduced are with promises of freedom and democracy, yet they never take a look at what democracy has done. In principle democracy is the rule of the majority, however in every country in which democracy has taken hold, be it america, britain, france, etc a small group of people has been able to control a commodity, be it the media, weapons, money, food, etc to manipulate the masses to their will. Such has happened in america that elections have been rigged for decades and the people fall for it, thinking they have freedom and democracy, ie a system which they think they can control but do not. This method has helped groups of elitist gangsters take control in america and in the britsh commonwealth and has caused mass violations of people’s freedoms in those countries, yet the masses falsely think democracy can save them.
Furthermore, the memories and knowledge of the people rioting/demonstrating for democracy they forget or do not realize the consequences of their actions. Promises of democracy were made in Iran in 1978, which caused the current regime to be put in power in 1979, and now the same tactics that were used to put that regime in power then are being used now to attack it. Promises of democracy were made in Yugoslavia in the 1990’s to destroy that country and to overthrow Milosevic, and when subsequent political leaders in Serbia began behaving like Milosevic elections were manipulated with american backing to remove them. In Georgia the american government incited riots against Shevardnadze to get him to resign in favor of the candidate of their choice, who led Georgia into a disastrous war with Russia which america could not get involved in. In the Ukraine american backing of Yushchenko pressured his pro-Russian opponents to yield to him in an election, and now the Ukraine not only has more government problems but is economically weaker and more at the mercy of Russia. In Pakistan Musharraff was pressured to resign after american and british backed rioters took to the streets against him in the name of democracy, and now Pakistan is unstable with american military attacks occurring there regularly. People in Kyrgyzstan rioted in 2005 to pressure Akayev, who was anti-american, to resign in favor of Bakiyev, who now is taking the same stance as his predecessor. Haiti has seen two american invasions in two decades in order to push american democracy there by ousting popularly elected leaders, leaving the country a wasteland. Liberia was invaded by the bush administration to put the leader of america’s choice there ruining the country. Overall, democracy today is as much a form of dictatorship as nazism, fascism, marxism, and communism, and those who agitate for democracy do so like a blind man who desires a painting.
When people agitate for something they must think carefully about what they are agitating for. This is true in the case of democracy in a world with an ever increasing population of stupid, lazy young people who have no consideration of what makes the world around them the way it is. The more one takes a look at democracy one sees it is as evil as other competing ideologies and makes one want to say kiram democracy.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
More Iranian censorship going on
Recently I have noticed all sorts of censorship going on. For instance iranian.com will NOT let people post any comments that are anything but in support of the rioters. Also keep a heads up for media propagandists like jerry doyle, sean hannity, jerome corsi, george noory, mike savage, and the nyrimes cohen who continue to spew distorted facts about what is going on in Iran. No matter what your views are get all the facts on the situation in Iran and consider the results of all actions. Considering how people banded together during the bush/blair years to keep Iran free from foreign invasion those involved in Iranian affairs must continue to think of Iran's safety.
Peter Khan Zendran
Peter Khan Zendran
Demistifying anti-riot tactics
I just recieved this today.
http://www.iranian.com/main/node/69429
The author of this post does NOT know how to handle himself in a riot, and seeing he is a cop he has obviously encountered weak rioters. As someone who has been on both sides of the fence at demos and riots here is the truth about this person's tactics.
1. When it comes to close quarter fighting, be it going after riot cops with batons and other weapons or hand to hand combat, everything is luck of the draw, though the advantage rests with those with the better weapons and with more numbers. The fact that a cop 2 inches away from you can't fight is bullshit, if they can't hit they will grapple or swing blind too. If they are overwhelmed they will fall back and use their guns to kill rioters as they have and which they are right to do in these situations. Because the author of that post was stupid enough to telegraph tactics by suggesting rioters come armed it is probable the Basijis and Iranian riot cops will bring hand to hand weapons of their own, as happened in philly in 2000 and in north providence in 2007. To put this in perspective consider this. In April 2008 I put 3 cops in the hospital using close quarter tactics, the first one in single combat, and 2 more when I was swarmed, as they used the swarm tactic to get me under control and keep anyone from assisting me away. In September 2005 I chased cindy sheehan and her marines out of providence I took one of her marines out hand to hand, then when I was swarmed I moved into the crowd, where the crowd took my side and got them off. So luck of the draw is always the key in hand to hand situations.
2. The purpose of mounted cops, be it on horses or motorcycles, is to both increase manouverability and have an object which can be used as a ready weapon. While mounted cops are vulnerable in one on one confrontations, unless they are taken down immeadeatly knocking them off their bike will only buy them seconds to recover, and if they sense an attack they can always dismount and use their bike as a weapon, as has been done at riots and other confrontations.
3. The purpose of tear gas is to weaken crowds, either by dispersing them, or by imparing them either by weakening their respertory system or forcing them to wear cumbersome breathing gear unsuited to taking on multiple individuals.
4. As Iranian police have been given authorization to use deadly force and they have used that force already the author neglects to condsider this. The author should know that when lethal force has been authorized cops will use it when they feel threatened as they do not have to worry about taking anyone alive. As a cop he should know that when such an order has been given in a situation where cops have been taken down individually is for the cops being attacked directly to fall back so that the officers behind them may better fire on the rioters. In this situation it may be assumed that even if one cop is taken out the others will use lethal force on any and all people in the group of rioters will be shot. Also expect more lethal gasses to be used than tear gas against rioters.
Those causing the riots are threatening the stability of Iran and deserve whatever they get.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
http://www.iranian.com/main/node/69429
The author of this post does NOT know how to handle himself in a riot, and seeing he is a cop he has obviously encountered weak rioters. As someone who has been on both sides of the fence at demos and riots here is the truth about this person's tactics.
1. When it comes to close quarter fighting, be it going after riot cops with batons and other weapons or hand to hand combat, everything is luck of the draw, though the advantage rests with those with the better weapons and with more numbers. The fact that a cop 2 inches away from you can't fight is bullshit, if they can't hit they will grapple or swing blind too. If they are overwhelmed they will fall back and use their guns to kill rioters as they have and which they are right to do in these situations. Because the author of that post was stupid enough to telegraph tactics by suggesting rioters come armed it is probable the Basijis and Iranian riot cops will bring hand to hand weapons of their own, as happened in philly in 2000 and in north providence in 2007. To put this in perspective consider this. In April 2008 I put 3 cops in the hospital using close quarter tactics, the first one in single combat, and 2 more when I was swarmed, as they used the swarm tactic to get me under control and keep anyone from assisting me away. In September 2005 I chased cindy sheehan and her marines out of providence I took one of her marines out hand to hand, then when I was swarmed I moved into the crowd, where the crowd took my side and got them off. So luck of the draw is always the key in hand to hand situations.
2. The purpose of mounted cops, be it on horses or motorcycles, is to both increase manouverability and have an object which can be used as a ready weapon. While mounted cops are vulnerable in one on one confrontations, unless they are taken down immeadeatly knocking them off their bike will only buy them seconds to recover, and if they sense an attack they can always dismount and use their bike as a weapon, as has been done at riots and other confrontations.
3. The purpose of tear gas is to weaken crowds, either by dispersing them, or by imparing them either by weakening their respertory system or forcing them to wear cumbersome breathing gear unsuited to taking on multiple individuals.
4. As Iranian police have been given authorization to use deadly force and they have used that force already the author neglects to condsider this. The author should know that when lethal force has been authorized cops will use it when they feel threatened as they do not have to worry about taking anyone alive. As a cop he should know that when such an order has been given in a situation where cops have been taken down individually is for the cops being attacked directly to fall back so that the officers behind them may better fire on the rioters. In this situation it may be assumed that even if one cop is taken out the others will use lethal force on any and all people in the group of rioters will be shot. Also expect more lethal gasses to be used than tear gas against rioters.
Those causing the riots are threatening the stability of Iran and deserve whatever they get.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
Monday, June 22, 2009
Major Iran news, Iran's government holds firm
These two news pieces are important. The one about Iran's military manouvers shows that Iran's government can still protect it's territory even with whacko rioters and demonstrators who do not realize the more they riot the more they leave Iran vulnerable to invasion like Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Liberia, haiti, etc. The one about media manipulation from voa and bbc is important. The propaganda campaigns of 1941 and 1978-9 were instrumental in causing instability in Iran. The voa persian not only spews propaganda but has spammed people, myself included, with their broadcasts. If Iranian news agencies behaved in america and the uk the way voa and bbc do they would be shut down and charged with telecommunications violations.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
Iran’s Air Force starts maneuvers Monday
Tehran Times Political Desk
TEHRAN – Iran will carry out an air maneuver today to strengthen the
operational might of the air force.
The air exercise that is called ""Milad-e-Noure-Velayat"" aims at
increasing the logistical power and jet fighters’ capability.
Fueling and refueling operations will also be carried out during the air
show.
The fighters will fly at low altitude at a distance of 700 km over the
Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman. They will test new ammunition that was
produced by the Air Force.
The reconnaissance and surveillance aircrafts will also be used during
the war game.
This maneuver is to promote the efficiency of the Air Force personnel in
loading the ammunition into the fighters.
The Air Force also carried out a war game named 'Ra'ad 2' over the
Persian Gulf waters and the Sea of Oman earlier this year in which the
war planes flew distances of approximately 2000 kilometers.
The Army carries out war games on a regular basis in order to enhance
coordination among its different forces and to test the newly developed
military weapons produced by the country as well
Copyright © 1998-2007 The Tehran Times Daily Newspaper, Tehran-Iran All
Rights Reserved.Email : Info@tehrantimes.com
http://www.payvand.com/news/09/jun/1223.html
06/21/09
Iran's Foreign Ministry Blames VOA, BBC for Unrest
Source: VOA
Iran's Foreign Ministry says the Voice of America and the British
Broadcasting Corporation are responsible for the post-election unrest in
Iran.
Iran's Press TV quotes Foreign Ministry Spokesman Hassan Qashqavi as
saying that any communication Iranians have with these news
organizations runs counter to Iranian sovereignty and is considered "an
act of enmity towards the Iranian nation."
In remarks Saturday, the spokesman also called VOA and the BBC "command
posts engineering the ongoing post-election riots."
Neda: Killed on June 20th, 2009 by the security forces in Tehran
Iranian authorities have severely restricted independent media coverage
of opposition protests, and witnesses to these events are reaching out
online and by telephone to report what they see on the streets.
They are relying on social media Web sites, such as Twitter, Facebook
and YouTube to tell the world about demonstrations and crackdowns in
their cities and news agencies find themselves relying on the
information these citizens' publish.
One video broadcast on CNN Sunday, found on YouTube, appears to show a
nighttime home invasion. The video is dark, but a woman can be heard
screaming in Farsi, "they are coming from the balcony!" and shouting
"get out!"
One look at Twitter postings on the theme of "Tehran" shows that many
people who are posting have tinted their profile pictures green, the
color of the opposition.
And Facebook has announced it is making its Web site available in
Persian, so Iranians can use the service in their native language.
Google also introduced a new Persian translating tool.
... Payvand News - 06/21/09 ... --
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
Iran’s Air Force starts maneuvers Monday
Tehran Times Political Desk
TEHRAN – Iran will carry out an air maneuver today to strengthen the
operational might of the air force.
The air exercise that is called ""Milad-e-Noure-Velayat"" aims at
increasing the logistical power and jet fighters’ capability.
Fueling and refueling operations will also be carried out during the air
show.
The fighters will fly at low altitude at a distance of 700 km over the
Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman. They will test new ammunition that was
produced by the Air Force.
The reconnaissance and surveillance aircrafts will also be used during
the war game.
This maneuver is to promote the efficiency of the Air Force personnel in
loading the ammunition into the fighters.
The Air Force also carried out a war game named 'Ra'ad 2' over the
Persian Gulf waters and the Sea of Oman earlier this year in which the
war planes flew distances of approximately 2000 kilometers.
The Army carries out war games on a regular basis in order to enhance
coordination among its different forces and to test the newly developed
military weapons produced by the country as well
Copyright © 1998-2007 The Tehran Times Daily Newspaper, Tehran-Iran All
Rights Reserved.Email : Info@tehrantimes.com
http://www.payvand.com/news/09/jun/1223.html
06/21/09
Iran's Foreign Ministry Blames VOA, BBC for Unrest
Source: VOA
Iran's Foreign Ministry says the Voice of America and the British
Broadcasting Corporation are responsible for the post-election unrest in
Iran.
Iran's Press TV quotes Foreign Ministry Spokesman Hassan Qashqavi as
saying that any communication Iranians have with these news
organizations runs counter to Iranian sovereignty and is considered "an
act of enmity towards the Iranian nation."
In remarks Saturday, the spokesman also called VOA and the BBC "command
posts engineering the ongoing post-election riots."
Neda: Killed on June 20th, 2009 by the security forces in Tehran
Iranian authorities have severely restricted independent media coverage
of opposition protests, and witnesses to these events are reaching out
online and by telephone to report what they see on the streets.
They are relying on social media Web sites, such as Twitter, Facebook
and YouTube to tell the world about demonstrations and crackdowns in
their cities and news agencies find themselves relying on the
information these citizens' publish.
One video broadcast on CNN Sunday, found on YouTube, appears to show a
nighttime home invasion. The video is dark, but a woman can be heard
screaming in Farsi, "they are coming from the balcony!" and shouting
"get out!"
One look at Twitter postings on the theme of "Tehran" shows that many
people who are posting have tinted their profile pictures green, the
color of the opposition.
And Facebook has announced it is making its Web site available in
Persian, so Iranians can use the service in their native language.
Google also introduced a new Persian translating tool.
... Payvand News - 06/21/09 ... --
Monday, June 15, 2009
IM's I recently recieved from Ishfahan
I just recieved this from a girl I know in Ishfahan who I keep in touch
via facebook and Yahooo IM. While I am NOT a supporter of mousavi and
do NOT condone the violence in the wake of Iran's elections in favor of
Ahmadinejad as mousavi is a cia asset and pawn of dick holbrooke and
further violence will weaken Irna and leave it vulnerable to invasion, I
still make it a point to keep in touch with people over there and I know
through my own work that there are better ways to handle Iran's
situation than with force or politicla manipulations. Below is a full
text of those IM's I have recently recieved, do with them as you will,
but bear in mind that my recieving them shows Iranian government control
over communications is NOT total.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÇÓÇãی äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå ÔÏÇä 23 ÎÑÏÇÏ
ÊæÌå !ÊæÌå! ÈÇ ˜ãÇá ÊÇËÑ æ ÇäÏæå ÊÇ ÑæÒ 24 ÎÑÏÇÏ ÊÚÏÇÏ ی ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå
ÔÏÇä ÑæÒ ÞÈá ÏÑ ÇËÑ ÏÑیÑی æ ÖÑÈ æ ÔÊã ÏÑ ÊÙÇåÑÇÊ¡ ÏÑ ÈåÔÊ
ÒåÑÇ Èå Îǘ ÓÑÏå ÔÏå ÇäÏ æ Çیä ãÓÆáå Èå ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ
ÇØáÇÚ ÏÇÏå äÔÏå ÇÓÊ ¡ ˜å Èå ãÑæÑ ÒãÇä ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇ ãØáÚ ÔæäÏ. ÇÓÇãی
ÊÚÏÇÏ äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ÂäåÇ ÈÏیä ÞÑÇÑ ÇÓÊ ٠ÝÇØãå ÈÑÇÊی -
˜ÓÑی ÔÑÝی - ãÈیäÇ ÇÍÊÑÇãی - ˜ÇãÈیÒ
ÔÚÇÚی - ãÍÓä ÇیãÇäی ãی ÈÇÔÏáØÝÇ Çیä ÎÈÑ ÑÇ
Èå åãå ÈÝÑÓÊیÏ ÊÇ Èå æÔ ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ ÈÑÓÏ Çیä
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÍÇãیÇä ÚÒیÒ¡ äیÑæ
åÇی ÏæáÊی æ æÒÇÑÊ ˜ÔæÑ æ äیÑæی ÇäÊÙÇãی ˜å
Èå åÑ ÍÇá ÇÒ ÂÏÑÓ ãäÒá ãیÑ ÍÓیä ãØáÚäÏ. ÍÞ ãÇ Èå ÚäæÇä
ÍÇãی æ ãÍÇÝÙ äیÒ åÓÊ ˜å ÈÏÇäیã. ÂÏÑÓ ãäÒá
ãیÑÍÓیä ãæÓæی:ÇÓÏÇÑÇä- Óå ÑÇå ÝÑãÇäیå-
ÎیÇÈÇä ÈæÓÊÇä- ÑæÈÑی ÓÝÇÑÊ ÚÑÈÓÊÇä- ÇäÊåÇی Èä ÈÓÊ
ãÑیã
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÊæÖیÍ: ÑÝÊä ی˜ی ÇÒ
äیÑæåÇی ÖÏÔæÑÔ ÊæÓØ ãÑÏã æ ÍãÇیÊ æی ˜å ãæÑÏ Íãáå
ÞÑÇÑ äیÑå http://www.mediafire.com/?iyjozmjwj4d ÍÊãÇ ÈÈیä
ÇÑÒÔÔ Ñæ ÏÇÑå!
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÑÇå یãÇیی ÂÑÇã æ ÈÏæä
ÎÔæäÊ ãáÊ ÇیÑÇä ÝÑÏÇ ÏÑ ÊãÇã ÔåÑåÇی ÇیÑÇä ÇÕÝåÇä
ÎíÇÈÇä åÇÑÈÇÛ ÈÇáÇ ÓÇÚÊ ÑÇåیãÇÆی :16
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM):
http://img1.tinypic.info/files/y99hu267ob08hrxmqgce.jpg
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM):
http://img1.tinypic.info/files/y99hu267ob08hrxmqgce.jpg
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÇÓÇãی äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå ÔÏÇä 23 ÎÑÏÇÏ
ÊæÌå !ÊæÌå! ÈÇ ˜ãÇá ÊÇËÑ æ ÇäÏæå ÊÇ ÑæÒ 24 ÎÑÏÇÏ ÊÚÏÇÏ ی ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå
ÔÏÇä ÑæÒ ÞÈá ÏÑ ÇËÑ ÏÑیÑی æ ÖÑÈ æ ÔÊã ÏÑ ÊÙÇåÑÇÊ¡ ÏÑ ÈåÔÊ
ÒåÑÇ Èå Îǘ ÓÑÏå ÔÏå ÇäÏ æ Çیä ãÓÆáå Èå ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ
ÇØáÇÚ ÏÇÏå äÔÏå ÇÓÊ ¡ ˜å Èå ãÑæÑ ÒãÇä ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇ ãØáÚ ÔæäÏ. ÇÓÇãی
ÊÚÏÇÏ äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ÂäåÇ ÈÏیä ÞÑÇÑ ÇÓÊ ٠ÝÇØãå ÈÑÇÊی -
˜ÓÑی ÔÑÝی - ãÈیäÇ ÇÍÊÑÇãی - ˜ÇãÈیÒ
ÔÚÇÚی - ãÍÓä ÇیãÇäی ãی ÈÇÔÏáØÝÇ Çیä ÎÈÑ ÑÇ
Èå åãå ÈÝÑÓÊیÏ ÊÇ Èå æÔ ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ ÈÑÓÏ Çیä
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): MIKOSHAM MIKOSHAM ANKE BARADARAM KOSHT
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÂÊÔ ÒÏä ی˜ ãÇÔیä áیÓ ÏÑ
ÊåÑÇä ÊæÓØ ãÑÏã http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keEVDq2NpoY
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): https://www.sabzedeh.com/fa/
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÊÕÇæیÑ Íãáå ÏیÔÈ Èå ˜æی:
http://entesabat88.persianblog.ir/post/2
TaraneH n is typing...
149 characters left
via facebook and Yahooo IM. While I am NOT a supporter of mousavi and
do NOT condone the violence in the wake of Iran's elections in favor of
Ahmadinejad as mousavi is a cia asset and pawn of dick holbrooke and
further violence will weaken Irna and leave it vulnerable to invasion, I
still make it a point to keep in touch with people over there and I know
through my own work that there are better ways to handle Iran's
situation than with force or politicla manipulations. Below is a full
text of those IM's I have recently recieved, do with them as you will,
but bear in mind that my recieving them shows Iranian government control
over communications is NOT total.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÇÓÇãی äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå ÔÏÇä 23 ÎÑÏÇÏ
ÊæÌå !ÊæÌå! ÈÇ ˜ãÇá ÊÇËÑ æ ÇäÏæå ÊÇ ÑæÒ 24 ÎÑÏÇÏ ÊÚÏÇÏ ی ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå
ÔÏÇä ÑæÒ ÞÈá ÏÑ ÇËÑ ÏÑیÑی æ ÖÑÈ æ ÔÊã ÏÑ ÊÙÇåÑÇÊ¡ ÏÑ ÈåÔÊ
ÒåÑÇ Èå Îǘ ÓÑÏå ÔÏå ÇäÏ æ Çیä ãÓÆáå Èå ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ
ÇØáÇÚ ÏÇÏå äÔÏå ÇÓÊ ¡ ˜å Èå ãÑæÑ ÒãÇä ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇ ãØáÚ ÔæäÏ. ÇÓÇãی
ÊÚÏÇÏ äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ÂäåÇ ÈÏیä ÞÑÇÑ ÇÓÊ ٠ÝÇØãå ÈÑÇÊی -
˜ÓÑی ÔÑÝی - ãÈیäÇ ÇÍÊÑÇãی - ˜ÇãÈیÒ
ÔÚÇÚی - ãÍÓä ÇیãÇäی ãی ÈÇÔÏáØÝÇ Çیä ÎÈÑ ÑÇ
Èå åãå ÈÝÑÓÊیÏ ÊÇ Èå æÔ ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ ÈÑÓÏ Çیä
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÍÇãیÇä ÚÒیÒ¡ äیÑæ
åÇی ÏæáÊی æ æÒÇÑÊ ˜ÔæÑ æ äیÑæی ÇäÊÙÇãی ˜å
Èå åÑ ÍÇá ÇÒ ÂÏÑÓ ãäÒá ãیÑ ÍÓیä ãØáÚäÏ. ÍÞ ãÇ Èå ÚäæÇä
ÍÇãی æ ãÍÇÝÙ äیÒ åÓÊ ˜å ÈÏÇäیã. ÂÏÑÓ ãäÒá
ãیÑÍÓیä ãæÓæی:ÇÓÏÇÑÇä- Óå ÑÇå ÝÑãÇäیå-
ÎیÇÈÇä ÈæÓÊÇä- ÑæÈÑی ÓÝÇÑÊ ÚÑÈÓÊÇä- ÇäÊåÇی Èä ÈÓÊ
ãÑیã
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÊæÖیÍ: ÑÝÊä ی˜ی ÇÒ
äیÑæåÇی ÖÏÔæÑÔ ÊæÓØ ãÑÏã æ ÍãÇیÊ æی ˜å ãæÑÏ Íãáå
ÞÑÇÑ äیÑå http://www.mediafire.com/?iyjozmjwj4d ÍÊãÇ ÈÈیä
ÇÑÒÔÔ Ñæ ÏÇÑå!
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÑÇå یãÇیی ÂÑÇã æ ÈÏæä
ÎÔæäÊ ãáÊ ÇیÑÇä ÝÑÏÇ ÏÑ ÊãÇã ÔåÑåÇی ÇیÑÇä ÇÕÝåÇä
ÎíÇÈÇä åÇÑÈÇÛ ÈÇáÇ ÓÇÚÊ ÑÇåیãÇÆی :16
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM):
http://img1.tinypic.info/files/y99hu267ob08hrxmqgce.jpg
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM):
http://img1.tinypic.info/files/y99hu267ob08hrxmqgce.jpg
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÇÓÇãی äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå ÔÏÇä 23 ÎÑÏÇÏ
ÊæÌå !ÊæÌå! ÈÇ ˜ãÇá ÊÇËÑ æ ÇäÏæå ÊÇ ÑæÒ 24 ÎÑÏÇÏ ÊÚÏÇÏ ی ÇÒ ˜ÔÊå
ÔÏÇä ÑæÒ ÞÈá ÏÑ ÇËÑ ÏÑیÑی æ ÖÑÈ æ ÔÊã ÏÑ ÊÙÇåÑÇÊ¡ ÏÑ ÈåÔÊ
ÒåÑÇ Èå Îǘ ÓÑÏå ÔÏå ÇäÏ æ Çیä ãÓÆáå Èå ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ
ÇØáÇÚ ÏÇÏå äÔÏå ÇÓÊ ¡ ˜å Èå ãÑæÑ ÒãÇä ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇ ãØáÚ ÔæäÏ. ÇÓÇãی
ÊÚÏÇÏ äÌ äÝÑ ÇÒ ÂäåÇ ÈÏیä ÞÑÇÑ ÇÓÊ ٠ÝÇØãå ÈÑÇÊی -
˜ÓÑی ÔÑÝی - ãÈیäÇ ÇÍÊÑÇãی - ˜ÇãÈیÒ
ÔÚÇÚی - ãÍÓä ÇیãÇäی ãی ÈÇÔÏáØÝÇ Çیä ÎÈÑ ÑÇ
Èå åãå ÈÝÑÓÊیÏ ÊÇ Èå æÔ ÎÇäæÇÏå åÇی ÂäåÇ ÈÑÓÏ Çیä
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): MIKOSHAM MIKOSHAM ANKE BARADARAM KOSHT
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÂÊÔ ÒÏä ی˜ ãÇÔیä áیÓ ÏÑ
ÊåÑÇä ÊæÓØ ãÑÏã http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keEVDq2NpoY
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): https://www.sabzedeh.com/fa/
TaraneH n (15/6/09 12:44 AM): ÊÕÇæیÑ Íãáå ÏیÔÈ Èå ˜æی:
http://entesabat88.persianblog.ir/post/2
TaraneH n is typing...
149 characters left
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Following up my open letter to leslie yeransian
Your recent reaction to my being on the news, namely on your old station, shows you have far to go as a person and makes me wonder about your mindset. Yes, people made trouble for us and eventually got theirs. However you were not completely honest with me and you still are not, and you must realize your actions have consequences as life is not the game you treat it to be.
You whine to me about taking down that letter. Can you change the past? Fuck no. What has happened has happened and we must face the past, for it effects the present and future. Furthermore I see you have the video of that news story you did which caused street people, some of who I used to help get services for, turn my doorstep and area into a place as filthy as the same abandoned squat building after they saw us in the news in August, thinking I coached you to say nasty things about them. Sure, the 501c3 crowd may be forgiving to you, but those who have to live in those abandoned buildings were effected by what you did, and many of them knew me. After all, when is the last time you ever experienced hardship?
How could you not think I was being honest and nice in sending you news about what happened to those who made trouble for us? After all, lisa churchville, jim taricani, the phoenix and prov urinal and their cohorts made as much trouble for me as they did for you. Had people not noticed that wjar would have not had to cut their employees as the staff from Fox news told me Friday, or the urinal nearly not gone under, or people would have avoided the providence library after I confronted the staff about their using online spyware to spy on our conversations. Or did you think you are the only one who has problems and can be affected?
Then again judging by how you act I really wonder about you. I’ll bet the reason that people gave you attidudes recently was that you gave them trouble and grief without ever considering their own situations and feelings. You complain about the bad behavior of others yet you demonstrate the same behaviors you complain about. Instead of facing the real world you hang out with phonies like the fuckheads at the algonquin club or in hollyweird, people who bring their problems upon themselves like the fuckheads from the fitzgerald novels you like, people who by their behavior goad clark rockefeller into doing what they do. In short, you behave like the rest of the sheeple that are ruining things in america and the world. I bet you never once thought about other people or considered things from the perspective of others. Nor would you recognize honesty from people like myself.
GROW UP YOU OVERGROWN INFANT.
Peter Z
You whine to me about taking down that letter. Can you change the past? Fuck no. What has happened has happened and we must face the past, for it effects the present and future. Furthermore I see you have the video of that news story you did which caused street people, some of who I used to help get services for, turn my doorstep and area into a place as filthy as the same abandoned squat building after they saw us in the news in August, thinking I coached you to say nasty things about them. Sure, the 501c3 crowd may be forgiving to you, but those who have to live in those abandoned buildings were effected by what you did, and many of them knew me. After all, when is the last time you ever experienced hardship?
How could you not think I was being honest and nice in sending you news about what happened to those who made trouble for us? After all, lisa churchville, jim taricani, the phoenix and prov urinal and their cohorts made as much trouble for me as they did for you. Had people not noticed that wjar would have not had to cut their employees as the staff from Fox news told me Friday, or the urinal nearly not gone under, or people would have avoided the providence library after I confronted the staff about their using online spyware to spy on our conversations. Or did you think you are the only one who has problems and can be affected?
Then again judging by how you act I really wonder about you. I’ll bet the reason that people gave you attidudes recently was that you gave them trouble and grief without ever considering their own situations and feelings. You complain about the bad behavior of others yet you demonstrate the same behaviors you complain about. Instead of facing the real world you hang out with phonies like the fuckheads at the algonquin club or in hollyweird, people who bring their problems upon themselves like the fuckheads from the fitzgerald novels you like, people who by their behavior goad clark rockefeller into doing what they do. In short, you behave like the rest of the sheeple that are ruining things in america and the world. I bet you never once thought about other people or considered things from the perspective of others. Nor would you recognize honesty from people like myself.
GROW UP YOU OVERGROWN INFANT.
Peter Z
Sunday, May 24, 2009
More odd watson/shit u goings on
Interesting today how the commencement at brown was ruined by a thunderstorm. It seems the powers that be realize what shit they are and decided to crash the event.
Then again, watson is up to it's usual fucked up shit as well. They just made a cousin of chicken shit kennedy's as the new director at watson. Also nigress simmons, chicken shit kennedy, and some south korean fuckheads dedicated the library there just days ago. Good thing I got my works out of there when I did.
Peter Z
Then again, watson is up to it's usual fucked up shit as well. They just made a cousin of chicken shit kennedy's as the new director at watson. Also nigress simmons, chicken shit kennedy, and some south korean fuckheads dedicated the library there just days ago. Good thing I got my works out of there when I did.
Peter Z
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Zendran colleague on guantanamo/media matters killed, odd timing
I only recieved this news a few hours ago. Mike Bhatia and I were involved in the watson institute's participation at the Seton Hall guantanamo teach in on October 5, 2006. It was at this event where it was revealed that most of the guantanamo detainees were NOT terrorists and did not belong there, and strategies of releasing detainees was discussed, including repatriating detainees and shutting down guantanamo. What was discussed at this event where the basis for the executive order closing guantanamo originated. Also odd was the timing of his death, weeks after my confrontations with brown/watson, while he was working in Afghanistan. Mike Bhatia worked to call attention to american depredations on Afghans and other people, and was one of my few remaining supporters who had any affiliation with brown/watson. Notice how the details of his death are not publicized and how news of his death was kept low key, which is one reason I only learned about it recently. If anyone supports the release of guantanamo and other wrongfully detained people in american custody they owe Mike one. Below is info about that Seton Hall guantanamo event and news regarding Mike Bhatia's death.
Peter Khan Zendran
http://www.watsoninstitute.org/events_detail.cfm?id=785
Guantánamo: How Should We Respond? Symposium
Thursday, October 5, 2006
through
Related Person
Michael Vinay Bhatia '99
With more than 200 schools in at least 44 states already participating, "Guantánamo: How Should We Respond?” is an unprecedented collaborative effort among representatives from academia, journalism, religion, medicine and the military in exploring the government’s detention policy and practices in the “war on terror.”
Including:
• An open-door, day-long videoconference of a nationwide “teach-in” from 10:00 AM – 5:30 PM
• A live panel discussion at 5:45 PM featuring Sarah E. Havens ‘99, an attorney representing Guantánamo Bay detainees, introduced by Watson Visiting Fellow Michael Bhatia ‘99
• An online discussion already in progress here.
Videoconference
Seton Hall will host an all-day conference available at academic institutions across the United States to study the national and international implications of indefinitely detaining hundreds of individuals deemed "enemy combatants."
Guantánamo: How Should We Respond?” has taken on increased importance since President George W. Bush’s announcement on September 6 that fourteen suspected terrorist previously held in secret United States facilities abroad will be transferred for trial by military commission at Guantánamo. This decision casts into question both the meaning of a fair trial in that setting, as well as the failure of the government to bring charges against the vast majority of the present detainees.
At the Watson Institute, participants are invited to join the videoconference any point in the day. (See tentative schedule, below.)
Live Panel
At 5:45pm, participants are also invited to a live discussion about the prisoners and their legal issues at the Watson Institute, “Lawyering in Guantánamo: Representing ‘Enemy Combatants,’” featuring Sarah E. Havens ‘99, an attorney representing Guantánamo Bay detainees, introduced by Watson Visiting Fellow Michael Bhatia ‘99.
Sarah E. Havens currently represents 11 Guantánamo Bay detainees in their federal habeas corpus case, also serving as an associate in the litigation department of Allen & Overy LLP in New York. Proficient in Arabic, she has traveled repeatedly to the Guantánamo Bay detention facility and to Yemen to interview detainees and their families. Prior to joining Allen & Overy, she worked at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the American University in Cairo, both in Egypt. A 1999 honors graduate of Brown University, she received her JD cum laude from Georgetown in 2003.
Location: Joukowsky Forum, Watson Institute, 111 Thayer Street.
Tentative Schedule (as of 9/28/06)
Session One: Opening Remarks – 10:00-10:45
• Welcome: Mark P. Denbeaux - Professor, Seton Hall Law School
• Introduction: Baher Azmy - Professor, Seton Hall Law School
• Guantánamo: A Primer on the Administrations Detention Policy - Extraordinary Rendition, CIA & Military Detention, and Military Commissions: Joseph Margulies, Esq.- Clinical Professor, Northwestern University School of Law, and Author of Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power
Session Two: Journalists Look Behind the Wire – 10:45-2:00
• Moderator: Jack Hit, New York Times & Harper's Magazine
• Jane Mayer - Journalist, New Yorker
• Carol Rosenberg - Journalist, Miami Herald
• Adam Zagorin - Journalist, Time Magazine
Habeas Interlude: Force Feeding – 12:00-12:15
• Julia Tarver Mason, Esq. - Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, LLP
Session Three: First, Do No Harm: Medical Professionals and Guantánamo – 12:15-1:30
• Moderator: Brigadier General (Ret.) Dr. Stephen Xenakis, M.D.
• Leonard Rubenstein - Physicians for Human Rights
• Gerald Koocher, Ph.D. - President, American Psychological Association
• Jonathan Marks - Professor Pennsylvania State University
Habeas Interlude: Insults to Religion – 1:30-1:45
• Thomas Wilner, Esq - Shearman & Sterling
Concurrent Sessions Four & Five
Session Four: Matters of Faith: Guantánamo and Religious Communities – 1:45-2:45
• Moderator: Ingrid Mattson, Ph.D., Professor of Islamic Studies & Director of Islamic Chaplaincy, Hartford Seminary
• Captain James Yee - Author: For God and Country
• Rev. George Hunsinger - Professor, Princeton Theological Seminary
• Rabbi Michael Feinberg - Executive Director, Greater New York Labor-Religion Coalition
Habeas Interlude: Suicide – 2:45-3:00
• Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, Esq.- Dorsey & Whitney
Session Five: American Detention Policy: The Next Frontier – 1:45-3:00
• Moderator: Jonathan Hafetz, Esq. - Brennan Center for Justice, NYU Law School
• Gitanjali Gutierrez, Esq. - Center for Constitutional Rights
• John Sifton - Human Rights Watch
• Margaret Satterthwaite - Professor, NYU School of Law
Session Six: History of Torture in the Modern World – 3:00-4:15
• Moderator: Joseph Margulies
• John Conroy - Journalist, Chicago Reader, & Author: Unspeakable Acts, Ordinary People: The Dynamics Of Torture
• Alfred McCoy - Professor, University of Wisconsin & Author: A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation from the Cold War to the War on Terror
• Walter Pincus - Journalist, Washington Post
• Craig Haney - Professor, University of California, Santa Cruz
Habeas Interlude: Innocents at Guántanamo – 4:15-4:30
• Baher Azmy, Professor, Seton Hall University School of Law
Session Seven: The Military and the Commander in Chief – 4:30-5:45
• Moderator, Ronald W. Meister, Esq. - partner at Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City
• Rear Adm. Donald Guter (Ret.) - Dean Duquesne Law School
• Commander Charles Swift - Counsel, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
• Colonel Dwight H. Sullivan - USMC, Chief Military Defense Counsel, Military Commissions
Live Session at Watson: Lawyering in Guántanamo: Representing ‘Enemy Combatants’ – 5:45-7:00
• Moderator, Watson Visiting Fellow Michael Bhatia ‘99
• Sarah E. Havens ‘99, an attorney representing Guantánamo Bay detainees
More information
Event Summary
Sarah E. Havens ’99 has spent eight weeks at the Guantánamo Bay detention center since January 2005 meeting with her clients, 11 Yemeni detainees. “The accommodations for legal teams there feel like a second home to me, unfortunately,” she said at the Institute last week. The Institute’s videoconference of a day-long nationwide teach-in about Guantánamo Bay culminated in a first-hand account of life there as a defense attorney.
The lawsuits she filed argue for habeas corpus (the right to hear the charges and evidence for which you have been arrested), but with the lack of legal recourse available to these men, Havens is as much someone to talk to or to show up with some Starbucks as she is a defense counsel. She has met with the families of all of her clients, and she often carries words of greeting and stories to various family members. In one case, she located the father of a client whom they had not been able to contact. He had assumed his son was dead until Havens and her partner brought news.
Havens took the case for her firm in January 2005, as she was the only one proficient in Arabic. Havens said that the work has taught her the value of due process and put a human face on men who have, without trial, already been labeled “the worst of the worst.” She brought pictures of her clients and their families to share, which were harshly juxtaposed with images of a large group of detainees bound and hooded “like a bunch of chickens.” In general, Havens’ clients won’t talk about the harsh treatment or torture they have undergone. “This is a private, shameful thing for them,” she said. They would prefer to talk about lighter things.
Take Fahmi Abdullah Al Tawlaqi, accused of being a supply truck driver in Yemen. Havens described him as a diminutive joker who dreams of returning to Yemen to become a rap star (having learned American rap from the guards) or Riyad Ataq Ali Abdoh Al Haj, who is accused of being a nurse at a Taliban hospital and was originally arrested because of a name mix-up. From her personal experience, Havens says that most of these men are victims of circumstance rather than vicious potential terrorists, and she is discouraged by the lack of due process offered them.
The push for a legal venue for these men has been difficult. Although detainees are now allowed to attend their hearings, says Havens, once they find out the charges against them, they are often told that the evidence is classified, and so there is no way to respond. Havens has been frustrated by the lack of effort on the part of the tribunals to call defense witnesses, some of whom are other detainees.
Havens says she has also had difficulty with a lack of cooperation from the US government. Correspondence of any kind with her clients is virtually impossible because it is regarded as classified. (She must go to Washington, D.C., to read their emails.) And so she must travel to Guantánamo in person. Once there, she must stay on the other side of the bay and does not have much time with her clients. “Even if I get up extremely early, I’ll probably have about five hours with one client,” she said.
Havens is skeptical that her clients will ever receive habeas corpus hearings because the evidence against the detainees would be either insufficient or inadmissible because it was obtained using torture. The best case scenario in her view would be repatriation. “My clients would like to be in a prison where the guards speak their language, and where no one will make fun of them for praying,” she explained. As Yemenis, however, her clients may not get this opportunity because the US does not trust the Yemeni government to securely hold transferred prisoners.
Submitted by Watson Institute Student Rapporteur Liana Paris ’07
http://www.watsoninstitute.org/news_detail.cfm?id=851
In Memory of Michael Vinay Bhatia '99Related Project
Cultural Awareness in the Military
Listen to a broadcast aired by NPR.
Read a eulogy from Michael's sister Tricia here.
A tribute from advisor, colleague, and friend Jarat Chopra is available here.
Oxford University's St. Antony's College has posted a tribute page here.
The family-placed obituary and guest book are available here.
Read Michael's personal photo essays here.
Read a statement from the US military here.
A news article about his death is here.
A co-authored 2004 article on peace efforts in Afghanistan is available here.
Read a UN statement given by Michael as an undergraduate here.
Michael Bhatia
May 26, 2008
Michael Vinay Bhatia ’99 died May 7 in Afghanistan, where he was working as a social scientist in consultation with the US military.
In addition to graduating magna cum laude in international relations from Brown University, Michael was a visiting fellow at the Watson Institute from July 2006 to June 2007. At the Institute, he was involved in a research project on Cultural Awareness in the Military, writing his PhD dissertation, and teaching a senior seminar on "The US Military: Global Supremacy, Democracy and Citizenship."
Over several years, Michael’s research and humanitarian work took him to such conflict zones as Sahrawi refugee camps, East Timor, and Kosovo, in addition to Afghanistan.
Of his work in Afghanistan, Michael wrote in November: “The program has a real chance of reducing both the Afghan and American lives lost, as well as ensuring that the US/NATO/ISAF strategy becomes better attuned to the population's concerns, views, criticisms and interests and better supports the Government of Afghanistan.”
Michael had recently published some of his research on Afghanistan.
His co-authored book on Afghanistan, Arms and Conflict: Armed Groups, Disarmament and Security in a Post-War Society was just released by Routledge in April. It assesses small arms and security-related issues in post-9/11 Afghanistan.
His edited book on Terrorism and the Politics of Naming was published by Routledge last September. Stating that names are not objective, the book seeks the truth behind those assigned in such cases as the US hunt for al-Qaeda, Russia’s demonization of the Chechens, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
In August, his personal three-part photo essay, “Shooting Afghanistan: Beyond the Conflict,” was published by theGlobalist. In it, he wrote:
“Afghanistan will soon reach a desperate milestone – the thirtieth anniversary of ongoing conflict. … Though I have spent the majority of my time there researching the wars and those involved in it, conflict is not my primary memory and way of knowing it. I am compelled to write about experiences and ideas that cannot be placed into analytical paradigms, which do not speak to theories of war or peace, to destruction or to reconstruction, but instead to daily interactions that occurred in the course of research.”
His love of photography is revealing. In theGlobalist piece, he also wrote:
“Building on Robert Capa’s statement that 'If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough,' James Nachtwey, the preeminent photo-realist and conflict photographer, once indicated that the primary characteristic of a good war photographer was proximity, closeness and involvement.”
Michael was a doctoral candidate in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford. He was awarded a George C. Marshall Scholarship in 2001 and a Scoville Peace Fellowship in 2000, supporting residence at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington, DC.
He was working on his dissertation, titled “The Mujahideen: A Study of Combatant Motives in Afghanistan, 1978-2005,” based on 350 interviews with combatants throughout Afghanistan, as well as archival and media research. He has also conducted research in Afghanistan for the Overseas Development Institute, the Small Arms Survey, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, the UK Department for International Development (via the International Policy Institute, King’s College, London), and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Before his fellowship at the Institute, he was a sessional lecturer on the causes of war in the Department of Political Science at Carleton University in Ottawa.
He is the author of War and Intervention: Issues for Contemporary Peace Operations (Kumarian Press, 2003); and of articles in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Global Governance, Review of African Political Economy, The International Journal of Refugee Law, International Peacekeeping, and Middle East Policy. He was the guest editor of The Third World Quarterly Special Issue: “The Politics of Naming: Rebels, Terrorists, Criminals, Bandits and Subversives,” which was then released as a book by Routledge. He received his MSc in international relations research from the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford.
“It's a terrible loss of someone so young, who had already accomplished a great deal, but had so much more to contribute,” said Institute Professor Thomas J. Biersteker, who advised Michael in his studies over the years.
Michael's funeral Mass was held on Friday, May 16, at 10am at St. Joseph’s Church, 151 Village St. in Medway, Massachusetts. Donations in Michael’s memory may be made to the Michael V. Bhatia Memorial Fund c/o Rockland Trust Company, 288 Union St., Rockland, MA 02370.
Colleagues gathered at the Watson Institute for a quiet reflection on Michael’s life on Monday, May 19. The University, together with the Class of ’98, also held a vigil and tree planting in the Institute's garden on Saturday, May 24. A small exhibition of Michael’s photography from Afghanistan will be open from 5pm, on the Institute's second floor.
Peter Khan Zendran
http://www.watsoninstitute.org/events_detail.cfm?id=785
Guantánamo: How Should We Respond? Symposium
Thursday, October 5, 2006
through
Related Person
Michael Vinay Bhatia '99
With more than 200 schools in at least 44 states already participating, "Guantánamo: How Should We Respond?” is an unprecedented collaborative effort among representatives from academia, journalism, religion, medicine and the military in exploring the government’s detention policy and practices in the “war on terror.”
Including:
• An open-door, day-long videoconference of a nationwide “teach-in” from 10:00 AM – 5:30 PM
• A live panel discussion at 5:45 PM featuring Sarah E. Havens ‘99, an attorney representing Guantánamo Bay detainees, introduced by Watson Visiting Fellow Michael Bhatia ‘99
• An online discussion already in progress here.
Videoconference
Seton Hall will host an all-day conference available at academic institutions across the United States to study the national and international implications of indefinitely detaining hundreds of individuals deemed "enemy combatants."
Guantánamo: How Should We Respond?” has taken on increased importance since President George W. Bush’s announcement on September 6 that fourteen suspected terrorist previously held in secret United States facilities abroad will be transferred for trial by military commission at Guantánamo. This decision casts into question both the meaning of a fair trial in that setting, as well as the failure of the government to bring charges against the vast majority of the present detainees.
At the Watson Institute, participants are invited to join the videoconference any point in the day. (See tentative schedule, below.)
Live Panel
At 5:45pm, participants are also invited to a live discussion about the prisoners and their legal issues at the Watson Institute, “Lawyering in Guantánamo: Representing ‘Enemy Combatants,’” featuring Sarah E. Havens ‘99, an attorney representing Guantánamo Bay detainees, introduced by Watson Visiting Fellow Michael Bhatia ‘99.
Sarah E. Havens currently represents 11 Guantánamo Bay detainees in their federal habeas corpus case, also serving as an associate in the litigation department of Allen & Overy LLP in New York. Proficient in Arabic, she has traveled repeatedly to the Guantánamo Bay detention facility and to Yemen to interview detainees and their families. Prior to joining Allen & Overy, she worked at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the American University in Cairo, both in Egypt. A 1999 honors graduate of Brown University, she received her JD cum laude from Georgetown in 2003.
Location: Joukowsky Forum, Watson Institute, 111 Thayer Street.
Tentative Schedule (as of 9/28/06)
Session One: Opening Remarks – 10:00-10:45
• Welcome: Mark P. Denbeaux - Professor, Seton Hall Law School
• Introduction: Baher Azmy - Professor, Seton Hall Law School
• Guantánamo: A Primer on the Administrations Detention Policy - Extraordinary Rendition, CIA & Military Detention, and Military Commissions: Joseph Margulies, Esq.- Clinical Professor, Northwestern University School of Law, and Author of Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power
Session Two: Journalists Look Behind the Wire – 10:45-2:00
• Moderator: Jack Hit, New York Times & Harper's Magazine
• Jane Mayer - Journalist, New Yorker
• Carol Rosenberg - Journalist, Miami Herald
• Adam Zagorin - Journalist, Time Magazine
Habeas Interlude: Force Feeding – 12:00-12:15
• Julia Tarver Mason, Esq. - Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, LLP
Session Three: First, Do No Harm: Medical Professionals and Guantánamo – 12:15-1:30
• Moderator: Brigadier General (Ret.) Dr. Stephen Xenakis, M.D.
• Leonard Rubenstein - Physicians for Human Rights
• Gerald Koocher, Ph.D. - President, American Psychological Association
• Jonathan Marks - Professor Pennsylvania State University
Habeas Interlude: Insults to Religion – 1:30-1:45
• Thomas Wilner, Esq - Shearman & Sterling
Concurrent Sessions Four & Five
Session Four: Matters of Faith: Guantánamo and Religious Communities – 1:45-2:45
• Moderator: Ingrid Mattson, Ph.D., Professor of Islamic Studies & Director of Islamic Chaplaincy, Hartford Seminary
• Captain James Yee - Author: For God and Country
• Rev. George Hunsinger - Professor, Princeton Theological Seminary
• Rabbi Michael Feinberg - Executive Director, Greater New York Labor-Religion Coalition
Habeas Interlude: Suicide – 2:45-3:00
• Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, Esq.- Dorsey & Whitney
Session Five: American Detention Policy: The Next Frontier – 1:45-3:00
• Moderator: Jonathan Hafetz, Esq. - Brennan Center for Justice, NYU Law School
• Gitanjali Gutierrez, Esq. - Center for Constitutional Rights
• John Sifton - Human Rights Watch
• Margaret Satterthwaite - Professor, NYU School of Law
Session Six: History of Torture in the Modern World – 3:00-4:15
• Moderator: Joseph Margulies
• John Conroy - Journalist, Chicago Reader, & Author: Unspeakable Acts, Ordinary People: The Dynamics Of Torture
• Alfred McCoy - Professor, University of Wisconsin & Author: A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation from the Cold War to the War on Terror
• Walter Pincus - Journalist, Washington Post
• Craig Haney - Professor, University of California, Santa Cruz
Habeas Interlude: Innocents at Guántanamo – 4:15-4:30
• Baher Azmy, Professor, Seton Hall University School of Law
Session Seven: The Military and the Commander in Chief – 4:30-5:45
• Moderator, Ronald W. Meister, Esq. - partner at Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City
• Rear Adm. Donald Guter (Ret.) - Dean Duquesne Law School
• Commander Charles Swift - Counsel, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
• Colonel Dwight H. Sullivan - USMC, Chief Military Defense Counsel, Military Commissions
Live Session at Watson: Lawyering in Guántanamo: Representing ‘Enemy Combatants’ – 5:45-7:00
• Moderator, Watson Visiting Fellow Michael Bhatia ‘99
• Sarah E. Havens ‘99, an attorney representing Guantánamo Bay detainees
More information
Event Summary
Sarah E. Havens ’99 has spent eight weeks at the Guantánamo Bay detention center since January 2005 meeting with her clients, 11 Yemeni detainees. “The accommodations for legal teams there feel like a second home to me, unfortunately,” she said at the Institute last week. The Institute’s videoconference of a day-long nationwide teach-in about Guantánamo Bay culminated in a first-hand account of life there as a defense attorney.
The lawsuits she filed argue for habeas corpus (the right to hear the charges and evidence for which you have been arrested), but with the lack of legal recourse available to these men, Havens is as much someone to talk to or to show up with some Starbucks as she is a defense counsel. She has met with the families of all of her clients, and she often carries words of greeting and stories to various family members. In one case, she located the father of a client whom they had not been able to contact. He had assumed his son was dead until Havens and her partner brought news.
Havens took the case for her firm in January 2005, as she was the only one proficient in Arabic. Havens said that the work has taught her the value of due process and put a human face on men who have, without trial, already been labeled “the worst of the worst.” She brought pictures of her clients and their families to share, which were harshly juxtaposed with images of a large group of detainees bound and hooded “like a bunch of chickens.” In general, Havens’ clients won’t talk about the harsh treatment or torture they have undergone. “This is a private, shameful thing for them,” she said. They would prefer to talk about lighter things.
Take Fahmi Abdullah Al Tawlaqi, accused of being a supply truck driver in Yemen. Havens described him as a diminutive joker who dreams of returning to Yemen to become a rap star (having learned American rap from the guards) or Riyad Ataq Ali Abdoh Al Haj, who is accused of being a nurse at a Taliban hospital and was originally arrested because of a name mix-up. From her personal experience, Havens says that most of these men are victims of circumstance rather than vicious potential terrorists, and she is discouraged by the lack of due process offered them.
The push for a legal venue for these men has been difficult. Although detainees are now allowed to attend their hearings, says Havens, once they find out the charges against them, they are often told that the evidence is classified, and so there is no way to respond. Havens has been frustrated by the lack of effort on the part of the tribunals to call defense witnesses, some of whom are other detainees.
Havens says she has also had difficulty with a lack of cooperation from the US government. Correspondence of any kind with her clients is virtually impossible because it is regarded as classified. (She must go to Washington, D.C., to read their emails.) And so she must travel to Guantánamo in person. Once there, she must stay on the other side of the bay and does not have much time with her clients. “Even if I get up extremely early, I’ll probably have about five hours with one client,” she said.
Havens is skeptical that her clients will ever receive habeas corpus hearings because the evidence against the detainees would be either insufficient or inadmissible because it was obtained using torture. The best case scenario in her view would be repatriation. “My clients would like to be in a prison where the guards speak their language, and where no one will make fun of them for praying,” she explained. As Yemenis, however, her clients may not get this opportunity because the US does not trust the Yemeni government to securely hold transferred prisoners.
Submitted by Watson Institute Student Rapporteur Liana Paris ’07
http://www.watsoninstitute.org/news_detail.cfm?id=851
In Memory of Michael Vinay Bhatia '99Related Project
Cultural Awareness in the Military
Listen to a broadcast aired by NPR.
Read a eulogy from Michael's sister Tricia here.
A tribute from advisor, colleague, and friend Jarat Chopra is available here.
Oxford University's St. Antony's College has posted a tribute page here.
The family-placed obituary and guest book are available here.
Read Michael's personal photo essays here.
Read a statement from the US military here.
A news article about his death is here.
A co-authored 2004 article on peace efforts in Afghanistan is available here.
Read a UN statement given by Michael as an undergraduate here.
Michael Bhatia
May 26, 2008
Michael Vinay Bhatia ’99 died May 7 in Afghanistan, where he was working as a social scientist in consultation with the US military.
In addition to graduating magna cum laude in international relations from Brown University, Michael was a visiting fellow at the Watson Institute from July 2006 to June 2007. At the Institute, he was involved in a research project on Cultural Awareness in the Military, writing his PhD dissertation, and teaching a senior seminar on "The US Military: Global Supremacy, Democracy and Citizenship."
Over several years, Michael’s research and humanitarian work took him to such conflict zones as Sahrawi refugee camps, East Timor, and Kosovo, in addition to Afghanistan.
Of his work in Afghanistan, Michael wrote in November: “The program has a real chance of reducing both the Afghan and American lives lost, as well as ensuring that the US/NATO/ISAF strategy becomes better attuned to the population's concerns, views, criticisms and interests and better supports the Government of Afghanistan.”
Michael had recently published some of his research on Afghanistan.
His co-authored book on Afghanistan, Arms and Conflict: Armed Groups, Disarmament and Security in a Post-War Society was just released by Routledge in April. It assesses small arms and security-related issues in post-9/11 Afghanistan.
His edited book on Terrorism and the Politics of Naming was published by Routledge last September. Stating that names are not objective, the book seeks the truth behind those assigned in such cases as the US hunt for al-Qaeda, Russia’s demonization of the Chechens, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
In August, his personal three-part photo essay, “Shooting Afghanistan: Beyond the Conflict,” was published by theGlobalist. In it, he wrote:
“Afghanistan will soon reach a desperate milestone – the thirtieth anniversary of ongoing conflict. … Though I have spent the majority of my time there researching the wars and those involved in it, conflict is not my primary memory and way of knowing it. I am compelled to write about experiences and ideas that cannot be placed into analytical paradigms, which do not speak to theories of war or peace, to destruction or to reconstruction, but instead to daily interactions that occurred in the course of research.”
His love of photography is revealing. In theGlobalist piece, he also wrote:
“Building on Robert Capa’s statement that 'If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough,' James Nachtwey, the preeminent photo-realist and conflict photographer, once indicated that the primary characteristic of a good war photographer was proximity, closeness and involvement.”
Michael was a doctoral candidate in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford. He was awarded a George C. Marshall Scholarship in 2001 and a Scoville Peace Fellowship in 2000, supporting residence at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington, DC.
He was working on his dissertation, titled “The Mujahideen: A Study of Combatant Motives in Afghanistan, 1978-2005,” based on 350 interviews with combatants throughout Afghanistan, as well as archival and media research. He has also conducted research in Afghanistan for the Overseas Development Institute, the Small Arms Survey, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, the UK Department for International Development (via the International Policy Institute, King’s College, London), and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Before his fellowship at the Institute, he was a sessional lecturer on the causes of war in the Department of Political Science at Carleton University in Ottawa.
He is the author of War and Intervention: Issues for Contemporary Peace Operations (Kumarian Press, 2003); and of articles in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Global Governance, Review of African Political Economy, The International Journal of Refugee Law, International Peacekeeping, and Middle East Policy. He was the guest editor of The Third World Quarterly Special Issue: “The Politics of Naming: Rebels, Terrorists, Criminals, Bandits and Subversives,” which was then released as a book by Routledge. He received his MSc in international relations research from the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford.
“It's a terrible loss of someone so young, who had already accomplished a great deal, but had so much more to contribute,” said Institute Professor Thomas J. Biersteker, who advised Michael in his studies over the years.
Michael's funeral Mass was held on Friday, May 16, at 10am at St. Joseph’s Church, 151 Village St. in Medway, Massachusetts. Donations in Michael’s memory may be made to the Michael V. Bhatia Memorial Fund c/o Rockland Trust Company, 288 Union St., Rockland, MA 02370.
Colleagues gathered at the Watson Institute for a quiet reflection on Michael’s life on Monday, May 19. The University, together with the Class of ’98, also held a vigil and tree planting in the Institute's garden on Saturday, May 24. A small exhibition of Michael’s photography from Afghanistan will be open from 5pm, on the Institute's second floor.
Friday, May 22, 2009
Zendran call censored on coasttocoastam
Last night I called in to straighten hoagland's ass out about his being wrong about Khrushchev and the joint space program with kennedy. A few weeks ago I goth through during open lines and explained to tom danheiser that I had talked with Sergei Khrushchev personally about this in November 2007 and Sergei told me that his father did recieve kennedy's offer for a joint Russian-us space program but did not make any final agreement, contrary to what hoagland keeps repeating on coasttocoastam. I got through at 1:53 AM EST and after 8 seconds my call was cut off. How's that for censorship?
Peter Z
Peter Z
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Iran facing zionist/amrikan threat of attack
Notice how once again the people of Filastin and Iran are linked in
their struggle. Notice the juncture this comes at when the following is
occuring.
1. Iran is in the midst of presidential elections, and once again
facing foreign manipulation of facts.
2. Pope Benedict XVI calls for a Palestinian state during a trip to
Filastin.
3. Iran has become more involved in Afghan and Pakistani affairs, which
could distract Iran from focusing on it's western and more explosive
front, ie Iraq, Filastin, and israel.
4. An increase of military aid from amrika is going to israel, bear in
mind that assisting another nation by proxy is assisting in aggression.
5. Egypt and other Arab nations are to meet with american officals
about Palestinian afairs.
6. The nuclear programs of Iran and israel are being brought into
discussion and the zionists and the nigger in the white house have
reiterated their opposition to Iran's nuclear program, which is an
attack on Iranian sovereignity.
7. The bilderberg meeting is getting underway in athens, with more
security than normal.
8. More teaparty demos are being planned for June in america, with many
government officals planning to come out against american government
criminal acts.
On more personal notes I noticed two other odd events. One, there was a
shooting at harvard yesterday, after there were major Iranian events at
MIT over the weekend. I attended the sunday MIT event, not feeling well
while experiencing visual trouble and knocking people around the street
all over boston and cambridge. Also I recieved a follower request on my
new twitter account from someone calling themselves presidentbarryo
recently, if this is the nigger in the white house playing his tricks it
is NOT funny.
Peter Khan Zendran
Netanyahu stands firm against demands from Obama
Israel stood firm against demands from Barack Obama on Monday to cease
the construction of Jewish settlements and embrace the "two-state
solution" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
By Alex Spillius in Washington
Published: 9:48PM BST 18 May 2009
Barack Obama warned Iran after meeting the Israeli prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office Photo: Getty
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, in his first meeting
with the US president, made it clear that while he welcomed Mr Obama's
commitment to the region, he was more concerned about dealing with the
threat of Iran than peace talks.
Mr Obama was unable to secure any commitments on ceasing the
construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank or embracing the
"two-state solution" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
Related Articles
Obama: Iran has nuclear deadline
Jews want Obama to show Israel 'tough love'
Barack Obama invites Middle East leaders to Washington
Israeli leader's party rejects Palestinian state before talks with
Barack Obama
Barack Obama faces tense meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu
Israel: a mission for peace that must not failSitting side by side in
the White House, the two leaders hailed the friendship between their two
countries but remained far apart on how to proceed towards a resolution
of the 60-year conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
Mr Obama said the Palestinians had to take steps to guarantee Israel's
security – but took a tough line on the construction of settlements on
Arab land.
"Israel is going to have to take difficult steps as well," he said.
"There is a clear understanding we have to make progress on settlements.
Settlements have to stop."
He called on Mr Netanyahu, who leads a hawkish, Right-wing coalition, to
seize a "historic opportunity" to work earnestly for peace.
"It is in the interests of Israel, the US and the international
community to achieve a two-state solution. We have seen progress stalled
on this front. I suggested to the prime minister he has a historic
opportunity to get serious movement on this issue during his tenure," he
said.
There was a conspicuous lack of praise for his 59-year-old Israeli
visitor, whom he said had the "benefit of having served" previously as
prime minister and for having "both youth and wisdom".
The meeting overran to two hours, suggesting that the two sides had
struggled to find a way of presenting a unified face to the watching
world.
Though Mr Netanyahu made clear he wanted to hold peace talks with the
Palestinians, he refused to utter the words "two-state solution", the
consensus approach towards peace agreed by previous Israeli governments
and US administrations.
Mr Obama is expected to announce his own revamped version of the "road
map" next month, after he has met Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian
president, and Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian president.
"The terminology will take care of itself," said Mr Netanyahu. "The
important thing is to resume negotiations with the Palestinians as soon
as possible. The issue is less one of terminology than of substance."
He said that if a peace deal delivered a "terror base next door" to
Israel than it would be worthless, and insisted that Hamas, the militant
group that controlled Gaza, had to recognise Israel before he was ready
to make concessions.
The prime minister dwelt at length on the threat posed to Israel by
Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons.
His goal is to persuade the Americans that Tehran must be reined in
before peacemaking with the Palestinians can progress.
their struggle. Notice the juncture this comes at when the following is
occuring.
1. Iran is in the midst of presidential elections, and once again
facing foreign manipulation of facts.
2. Pope Benedict XVI calls for a Palestinian state during a trip to
Filastin.
3. Iran has become more involved in Afghan and Pakistani affairs, which
could distract Iran from focusing on it's western and more explosive
front, ie Iraq, Filastin, and israel.
4. An increase of military aid from amrika is going to israel, bear in
mind that assisting another nation by proxy is assisting in aggression.
5. Egypt and other Arab nations are to meet with american officals
about Palestinian afairs.
6. The nuclear programs of Iran and israel are being brought into
discussion and the zionists and the nigger in the white house have
reiterated their opposition to Iran's nuclear program, which is an
attack on Iranian sovereignity.
7. The bilderberg meeting is getting underway in athens, with more
security than normal.
8. More teaparty demos are being planned for June in america, with many
government officals planning to come out against american government
criminal acts.
On more personal notes I noticed two other odd events. One, there was a
shooting at harvard yesterday, after there were major Iranian events at
MIT over the weekend. I attended the sunday MIT event, not feeling well
while experiencing visual trouble and knocking people around the street
all over boston and cambridge. Also I recieved a follower request on my
new twitter account from someone calling themselves presidentbarryo
recently, if this is the nigger in the white house playing his tricks it
is NOT funny.
Peter Khan Zendran
Netanyahu stands firm against demands from Obama
Israel stood firm against demands from Barack Obama on Monday to cease
the construction of Jewish settlements and embrace the "two-state
solution" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
By Alex Spillius in Washington
Published: 9:48PM BST 18 May 2009
Barack Obama warned Iran after meeting the Israeli prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office Photo: Getty
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, in his first meeting
with the US president, made it clear that while he welcomed Mr Obama's
commitment to the region, he was more concerned about dealing with the
threat of Iran than peace talks.
Mr Obama was unable to secure any commitments on ceasing the
construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank or embracing the
"two-state solution" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
Related Articles
Obama: Iran has nuclear deadline
Jews want Obama to show Israel 'tough love'
Barack Obama invites Middle East leaders to Washington
Israeli leader's party rejects Palestinian state before talks with
Barack Obama
Barack Obama faces tense meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu
Israel: a mission for peace that must not failSitting side by side in
the White House, the two leaders hailed the friendship between their two
countries but remained far apart on how to proceed towards a resolution
of the 60-year conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
Mr Obama said the Palestinians had to take steps to guarantee Israel's
security – but took a tough line on the construction of settlements on
Arab land.
"Israel is going to have to take difficult steps as well," he said.
"There is a clear understanding we have to make progress on settlements.
Settlements have to stop."
He called on Mr Netanyahu, who leads a hawkish, Right-wing coalition, to
seize a "historic opportunity" to work earnestly for peace.
"It is in the interests of Israel, the US and the international
community to achieve a two-state solution. We have seen progress stalled
on this front. I suggested to the prime minister he has a historic
opportunity to get serious movement on this issue during his tenure," he
said.
There was a conspicuous lack of praise for his 59-year-old Israeli
visitor, whom he said had the "benefit of having served" previously as
prime minister and for having "both youth and wisdom".
The meeting overran to two hours, suggesting that the two sides had
struggled to find a way of presenting a unified face to the watching
world.
Though Mr Netanyahu made clear he wanted to hold peace talks with the
Palestinians, he refused to utter the words "two-state solution", the
consensus approach towards peace agreed by previous Israeli governments
and US administrations.
Mr Obama is expected to announce his own revamped version of the "road
map" next month, after he has met Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian
president, and Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian president.
"The terminology will take care of itself," said Mr Netanyahu. "The
important thing is to resume negotiations with the Palestinians as soon
as possible. The issue is less one of terminology than of substance."
He said that if a peace deal delivered a "terror base next door" to
Israel than it would be worthless, and insisted that Hamas, the militant
group that controlled Gaza, had to recognise Israel before he was ready
to make concessions.
The prime minister dwelt at length on the threat posed to Israel by
Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons.
His goal is to persuade the Americans that Tehran must be reined in
before peacemaking with the Palestinians can progress.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Stingback shit u stalkers
As usual the fuckwads at shit u are up to their old tricks again. Yes, I beat the system again, yes, I still know their dirty deds. I have already informed contacts of mine in Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan of dick holbrooke's dirty dealings with hard evidence. And most recently I caught their nigger pig gonzalez following me around and photographed it. Remember you nigger brianed donut fuckers, when you are off duty you are no different than anyone else, give me shit I will give you shit back.
Peter Z
Peter Z
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Harvard, other bookstores which now carry "Iran; The Lion of War"
Recently several bookstores, including Harvard bookstore, now carry "Iran; The Lion of War." Below is a list of those bookstores, you can order from them in person or contact them to order "Iran; The Lion of War"
Harvard Bookstore
1256 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02138
1-800-542-READ
1-617-661-1515
http://www.harvard.com/
Books on the Square
471 Angell St.
Providence, RI 02906
1-401-331-9097
http://www.booksq.com/
Super Heroes
509 Mount Auburn St.
Watertown, MA 02472
1-617-924-9507
Curiosities
460 Wickenden St.
Providence, RI, 02906
1-401-421-0023
I am also negotiating with other bookstores to carry "Iran; The Lion of War." Also is a link to copies of "Iran; The Lion of War" on the shelves at Harvard bookstore in case you still doubt me
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.editAlbumPhoto&albumID=385629&imageID=28490425
Peter Khan Zendran
Harvard Bookstore
1256 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02138
1-800-542-READ
1-617-661-1515
http://www.harvard.com/
Books on the Square
471 Angell St.
Providence, RI 02906
1-401-331-9097
http://www.booksq.com/
Super Heroes
509 Mount Auburn St.
Watertown, MA 02472
1-617-924-9507
Curiosities
460 Wickenden St.
Providence, RI, 02906
1-401-421-0023
I am also negotiating with other bookstores to carry "Iran; The Lion of War." Also is a link to copies of "Iran; The Lion of War" on the shelves at Harvard bookstore in case you still doubt me
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.editAlbumPhoto&albumID=385629&imageID=28490425
Peter Khan Zendran
Iranian community in Boston area snubbed by MIT starr forum
Recently MIT held a conference on Iran's presidential election, moderated by barry posen. Oddly enough no Iranian organization in the Boston area was notofied about the event, and I only learned about the event when I arrived at MIT a half hour after the event ended. I guess posen and his cfr controllers are afraid of being shown up at their own events by Iranians interested in taking control of their future, not leaving it to some faceless bureaucrats.
Peter Khan Zendran
Peter Khan Zendran
Sunday, May 03, 2009
Si jendeh, saberi, ebadi, e bakhtiar
Recently the World has seen 3 examples of jendeh who demonstrate what is wrong with Iranian society. First, that jendeh saberi gets 8 years in prison for spying. As expected the pinkos and whinebabys in Iranian and Global society condem her sentence. What they do not realize is that she was and is creating propaganda for voa persian, which is a propaganda agency with zionist backing. Right now the zionist government has stated it plans to attack Iran. Therefore, Iran's government simply removed an info source from the zionists from the population, so if you support jendeh saberi's freedom you support attacking Iran.
Then of all things that jendeh ebadi offers to give legal defense to jendeh saberi. As usual the global pinkos and whinebabys all back jendeh ebadi. As usual they ignore the fact that this disgrace to the nobel prize has been among those who fabricate stories of human rights abuses in Iran. I mean, anyone who has ever recieved a call from a telemarketer or written letters at an amnesty international event could tell women's abuse stories jendeh ebadi promotes are scripted and without factual basis, designed to inflame people against Iran.
Thirdly, that jendeh bakhtiar who couldn't cut it at cnn is busy promoting those other 2 jendeh, and as usual for someone who is one of the media's talking whores puts a fluffy spin on those matters and ignores the hard facts. I mean if you believe everything jendeh bakhtiar reports on then you believe in the easter bunny and tooth fairy and belong in a dumpster like them.
Peter Khan Zendran
Then of all things that jendeh ebadi offers to give legal defense to jendeh saberi. As usual the global pinkos and whinebabys all back jendeh ebadi. As usual they ignore the fact that this disgrace to the nobel prize has been among those who fabricate stories of human rights abuses in Iran. I mean, anyone who has ever recieved a call from a telemarketer or written letters at an amnesty international event could tell women's abuse stories jendeh ebadi promotes are scripted and without factual basis, designed to inflame people against Iran.
Thirdly, that jendeh bakhtiar who couldn't cut it at cnn is busy promoting those other 2 jendeh, and as usual for someone who is one of the media's talking whores puts a fluffy spin on those matters and ignores the hard facts. I mean if you believe everything jendeh bakhtiar reports on then you believe in the easter bunny and tooth fairy and belong in a dumpster like them.
Peter Khan Zendran
Friday, April 24, 2009
Odd occurences around me
Recently two odd things have happened regarding my sentence. First, someone involved with my probation had items stolen from their car in east providence recently. Second, the Pawtucket public library is implementing a card log-in system, one week after I ran into brown/watson's jim blight using the computers there. hardly a coincidence.
Peter Z
Peter Z
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Finishing sentence/message to phonies
As of today I have finished probation. It has been a trying year but it is through. Oddly enough lately some folks from shit u are trying to act nice to me, be it when they see it on the street or by event invites. Those assholes I say "Fuck you you spawn of nigger bitches". You pretended to be my friends when you wanted something from me, then turned on me at the first sign of trouble. Now that you realize that I can make you're lives miserable as your enemy you think you can kiss and make up as if nothing ever happened. Well, you are living in a dreamworld. Your problems are of you're own making and if you have the intelligence you claim to have you will realize that this mess is your fault. Fuck off.
Peter Z
Peter Z
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Iran targeted for israeli attack.
This may sem like old news but for the following current events. First, it is not clear whether Iran's new weapons contracts with Russia have been cancelled, and so far Iran's military has shown no signs of being on alert or an increase in material production. Nor has anyone been able to confirm Iran's navy acquiring ports for Naval use on the Red Sea, where it can seriously impede israel's capabilities. This must be called into question as Iran has made offers of concessions on it's Nuclear program and it's military, the same mistake Saddam Hussein made in 2002 before he was invaded. Second, notice the current zionist leadership, graying old farts who would be willing to run the risk of a last desperate gamble. Third, notice how Iran's Latin American allies are trying to warm up to america now, VERY bad timing and showing a lack of solidarity and giving rise to the belief that Chavez, morales, and their pals are pawns of international bankers like soros like hitler, churchill, and stalin were. Overall, Iran must plan against this attack.
Peter Khan Zendran
Israel stands ready to bomb Iran's nuclear sites
Sheera Frenkel in Jerusalem
The Israeli military is preparing itself to launch a massive aerial assault on Iran's nuclear facilities within days of being given the go-ahead by its new government.
Among the steps taken to ready Israeli forces for what would be a risky raid requiring pinpoint aerial strikes are the acquisition of three Airborne Warning and Control (AWAC) aircraft and regional missions to simulate the attack.
Two nationwide civil defence drills will help to prepare the public for the retaliation that Israel could face.
“Israel wants to know that if its forces were given the green light they could strike at Iran in a matter of days, even hours. They are making preparations on every level for this eventuality. The message to Iran is that the threat is not just words,” one senior defence official told The Times.
Officials believe that Israel could be required to hit more than a dozen targets, including moving convoys. The sites include Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges produce enriched uranium; Esfahan, where 250 tonnes of gas is stored in tunnels; and Arak, where a heavy water reactor produces plutonium.
The distance from Israel to at least one of the sites is more than 870 miles, a distance that the Israeli force practised covering in a training exercise last year that involved F15 and F16 jets, helicopters and refuelling tankers.
The possible Israeli strike on Iran has drawn comparisons to its attack on the Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad in 1981. That strike, which destroyed the facility in under 100 seconds, was completed without Israeli losses and checked Iraqi ambitions for a nuclear weapons programme.
“We would not make the threat [against Iran] without the force to back it. There has been a recent move, a number of on-the-ground preparations, that indicate Israel's willingness to act,” said another official from Israel's intelligence community.
He added that it was unlikely that Israel would carry out the attack without receiving at least tacit approval from America, which has struck a more reconciliatory tone in dealing with Iran under its new administration.
An Israeli attack on Iran would entail flying over Jordanian and Iraqi airspace, where US forces have a strong presence.
Ephraim Kam, the deputy director of the Institute for National Security Studies, said it was unlikely that the Americans would approve an attack.
“The American defence establishment is unsure that the operation will be successful. And the results of the operation would only delay Iran's programme by two to four years,” he said.
A visit by President Obama to Israel in June is expected to coincide with the national elections in Iran — timing that would allow the US Administration to re-evaluate diplomatic resolutions with Iran before hearing the Israeli position.
“Many of the leaks or statements made by Israeli leaders and military commanders are meant for deterrence. The message is that if [the international community] is unable to solve the problem they need to take into account that we will solve it our way,” Mr Kam said.
Among recent preparations by the airforce was the Israeli attack of a weapons convoy in Sudan bound for militants in the Gaza Strip.
“Sudan was practice for the Israeli forces on a long-range attack,” Ronen Bergman, the author of The Secret War with Iran, said. “They wanted to see how they handled the transfer of information, hitting a moving target ... In that sense it was a rehearsal.”
Israel has made public its intention to hold the largest-ever nationwide drill next month.
Colonel Hilik Sofer told Haaretz, a daily Israeli newspaper, that the drill would “train for a reality in which during war missiles can fall on any part of the country without warning ... We want the citizens to understand that war can happen tomorrow morning”.
Israel will conduct an exercise with US forces to test the ability of Arrow, its US-funded missile defence system. The exercise would test whether the system could intercept missiles launched at Israel.
“Israel has made it clear that it will not tolerate the threat of a nuclear Iran. According to Israeli Intelligence they will have the bomb within two years ... Once they have a bomb it will be too late, and Israel will have no choice to strike — with or without America,” an official from the Israeli Defence Ministry said.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Peter Khan Zendran
Israel stands ready to bomb Iran's nuclear sites
Sheera Frenkel in Jerusalem
The Israeli military is preparing itself to launch a massive aerial assault on Iran's nuclear facilities within days of being given the go-ahead by its new government.
Among the steps taken to ready Israeli forces for what would be a risky raid requiring pinpoint aerial strikes are the acquisition of three Airborne Warning and Control (AWAC) aircraft and regional missions to simulate the attack.
Two nationwide civil defence drills will help to prepare the public for the retaliation that Israel could face.
“Israel wants to know that if its forces were given the green light they could strike at Iran in a matter of days, even hours. They are making preparations on every level for this eventuality. The message to Iran is that the threat is not just words,” one senior defence official told The Times.
Officials believe that Israel could be required to hit more than a dozen targets, including moving convoys. The sites include Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges produce enriched uranium; Esfahan, where 250 tonnes of gas is stored in tunnels; and Arak, where a heavy water reactor produces plutonium.
The distance from Israel to at least one of the sites is more than 870 miles, a distance that the Israeli force practised covering in a training exercise last year that involved F15 and F16 jets, helicopters and refuelling tankers.
The possible Israeli strike on Iran has drawn comparisons to its attack on the Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad in 1981. That strike, which destroyed the facility in under 100 seconds, was completed without Israeli losses and checked Iraqi ambitions for a nuclear weapons programme.
“We would not make the threat [against Iran] without the force to back it. There has been a recent move, a number of on-the-ground preparations, that indicate Israel's willingness to act,” said another official from Israel's intelligence community.
He added that it was unlikely that Israel would carry out the attack without receiving at least tacit approval from America, which has struck a more reconciliatory tone in dealing with Iran under its new administration.
An Israeli attack on Iran would entail flying over Jordanian and Iraqi airspace, where US forces have a strong presence.
Ephraim Kam, the deputy director of the Institute for National Security Studies, said it was unlikely that the Americans would approve an attack.
“The American defence establishment is unsure that the operation will be successful. And the results of the operation would only delay Iran's programme by two to four years,” he said.
A visit by President Obama to Israel in June is expected to coincide with the national elections in Iran — timing that would allow the US Administration to re-evaluate diplomatic resolutions with Iran before hearing the Israeli position.
“Many of the leaks or statements made by Israeli leaders and military commanders are meant for deterrence. The message is that if [the international community] is unable to solve the problem they need to take into account that we will solve it our way,” Mr Kam said.
Among recent preparations by the airforce was the Israeli attack of a weapons convoy in Sudan bound for militants in the Gaza Strip.
“Sudan was practice for the Israeli forces on a long-range attack,” Ronen Bergman, the author of The Secret War with Iran, said. “They wanted to see how they handled the transfer of information, hitting a moving target ... In that sense it was a rehearsal.”
Israel has made public its intention to hold the largest-ever nationwide drill next month.
Colonel Hilik Sofer told Haaretz, a daily Israeli newspaper, that the drill would “train for a reality in which during war missiles can fall on any part of the country without warning ... We want the citizens to understand that war can happen tomorrow morning”.
Israel will conduct an exercise with US forces to test the ability of Arrow, its US-funded missile defence system. The exercise would test whether the system could intercept missiles launched at Israel.
“Israel has made it clear that it will not tolerate the threat of a nuclear Iran. According to Israeli Intelligence they will have the bomb within two years ... Once they have a bomb it will be too late, and Israel will have no choice to strike — with or without America,” an official from the Israeli Defence Ministry said.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
The polish jew genealogical scam
There is nothing worse than to be called a liar when you are correct, especially when it comes to your family. In this day and age it happens to people more than ever. Lately people have been targeted by people who will state their family’s heritage is false, when in fact they are on the receiving of a scheme to defame them. Interestingly enough many people who pull this scam are polish, jewish, or a combination of the two. Often it happens to people in positions of influence, and the people who perpetrate those actions claim to be geneaologists. Yet often they do not show their work, delay in showing their work, or demand ridiculously high fees for their time and in doing so demonstrate a malicious.
This is something that I can speak of since I have had to deal with this problem and successfully silence those who made those claims. What essentially started out as ad hominem rumors began to circulate more frequently. To defend myself I thouroughly researched and obtained documents on my family to back myself up and quiten those spreading the slander. As it turned out the rumors and attacks were baseless, the truth being that the rumors were based on the facts that certain vital stastics and information on my father’s family were missing from immigration and that none of the facts were consistent on any government documents, which was common before WWII regarding immigrant families in america. When those doing the slander could not do as I had done they showed themselves as the liars they were. And as it turned out most of the slander came from people who were polish jews. As in investigating any case, it is the fine detais that are important.
Unfortunately, others have not been as smart and tenacious, and many of those targeted have been those in politics and positions of influence. Take john kerry for example. During his presidential campaign geneaologists claimed that kerry’s father’s ancestors were polish jews and he was distantly related to george bush. However, the only proof the researchers did was th hawk a genealogical software, not to show hard documents. The old story of jews adopting Irish names and behaviors is an old story which has circulated among many people, which though true for some people was never positively proven for kerry. Consider also this was brought up in an election, and had the effect of calling kerry’s character into question. Had this been brought up before the election it would have been believable, however since it occurred during an election year the credibelity and motivation of this geneaological scheme must be questioned. If one doubts this look at how similar accusations effected george allen in 2006, damaging his credibility and costing him his senate seat.
The case of madeline albright is another example. Though not seeking office she was appointed secretary of state under bill clinton to succeed warren christopher while she was serving as ambassador to the un. Right before her appointment rumors circulated that most of her family were in fact jews, most of who were killed during the holocaust, and this had been unknown until just before her confirmation. Though this did not effect her being appointed it called her credibility into question at a time when america was entangled in sensitive foreign issues. This was particularly noticed by those in the Balkans and Middle East, and also caused problems for bill clinton’s reputation.
If one thinks that this polish jew genealogical scam is confined to america one needs to look around the World more thouroughly. Take the example of israel’s current eternal enigma, the definite biography of ariel sharon. Of all of israel’s political leaders he is the only one without a definitive biography of his early years, as various sources place his year of birth from 1915 to 1928 and the location of his birth in poland, Russia, and israel. Or look at Iceland’s Dorrit Moussaieff. The fact that she is of Bukharan jewish ancestry is not in question, the claims made by some of her being related to Genghis Khan are. As it is her ancestors were among the artisans Genghis Khan kept alive to work for him, however with that other genealogical scam, the one where sloppy DNA work is used to claim that one-tenth of Asians are descended from Genghis Khan without properly testing it against known descendants of Genghis Khan, kicking around those rumors circulate, and without proof.
Lest you think this is confined to the realm of politics look at other prominent individuals. In April 2007 shortly after his death someone put up on wikipedia that Mstislav Rostropovich was really a polish jew, when in fact his heritage was Belarussian, Russian, and Azeri. Or how Shura Cherkassky has sometimes been labelled as jewish, when in fact his family were Iranian royals who settled in Russia and the Crimean Khanate during the 17th century, and the sole criteria used to label him as jewish was the fact he was born in Odessa. Or how Johann Stauss and other prominent people from Vienna and Austria are sometimes labeled as jewish, partly due to sloppy genealogical research.
I could go on forever listing individual cases, but my point is clear. Even today people are still falsely labeled as jewish in attempts to slur their character, including as polish jews. Do your own research and use reputable info instead of believing everything you hear. If you believe everything you hear you are as stupid as those who believe what the bank of poland said in 2007 that the polish settled jamestown instead of the english, or trust a military like israels that uses the motto strength through deception.
Peter Khan Zendran
This is something that I can speak of since I have had to deal with this problem and successfully silence those who made those claims. What essentially started out as ad hominem rumors began to circulate more frequently. To defend myself I thouroughly researched and obtained documents on my family to back myself up and quiten those spreading the slander. As it turned out the rumors and attacks were baseless, the truth being that the rumors were based on the facts that certain vital stastics and information on my father’s family were missing from immigration and that none of the facts were consistent on any government documents, which was common before WWII regarding immigrant families in america. When those doing the slander could not do as I had done they showed themselves as the liars they were. And as it turned out most of the slander came from people who were polish jews. As in investigating any case, it is the fine detais that are important.
Unfortunately, others have not been as smart and tenacious, and many of those targeted have been those in politics and positions of influence. Take john kerry for example. During his presidential campaign geneaologists claimed that kerry’s father’s ancestors were polish jews and he was distantly related to george bush. However, the only proof the researchers did was th hawk a genealogical software, not to show hard documents. The old story of jews adopting Irish names and behaviors is an old story which has circulated among many people, which though true for some people was never positively proven for kerry. Consider also this was brought up in an election, and had the effect of calling kerry’s character into question. Had this been brought up before the election it would have been believable, however since it occurred during an election year the credibelity and motivation of this geneaological scheme must be questioned. If one doubts this look at how similar accusations effected george allen in 2006, damaging his credibility and costing him his senate seat.
The case of madeline albright is another example. Though not seeking office she was appointed secretary of state under bill clinton to succeed warren christopher while she was serving as ambassador to the un. Right before her appointment rumors circulated that most of her family were in fact jews, most of who were killed during the holocaust, and this had been unknown until just before her confirmation. Though this did not effect her being appointed it called her credibility into question at a time when america was entangled in sensitive foreign issues. This was particularly noticed by those in the Balkans and Middle East, and also caused problems for bill clinton’s reputation.
If one thinks that this polish jew genealogical scam is confined to america one needs to look around the World more thouroughly. Take the example of israel’s current eternal enigma, the definite biography of ariel sharon. Of all of israel’s political leaders he is the only one without a definitive biography of his early years, as various sources place his year of birth from 1915 to 1928 and the location of his birth in poland, Russia, and israel. Or look at Iceland’s Dorrit Moussaieff. The fact that she is of Bukharan jewish ancestry is not in question, the claims made by some of her being related to Genghis Khan are. As it is her ancestors were among the artisans Genghis Khan kept alive to work for him, however with that other genealogical scam, the one where sloppy DNA work is used to claim that one-tenth of Asians are descended from Genghis Khan without properly testing it against known descendants of Genghis Khan, kicking around those rumors circulate, and without proof.
Lest you think this is confined to the realm of politics look at other prominent individuals. In April 2007 shortly after his death someone put up on wikipedia that Mstislav Rostropovich was really a polish jew, when in fact his heritage was Belarussian, Russian, and Azeri. Or how Shura Cherkassky has sometimes been labelled as jewish, when in fact his family were Iranian royals who settled in Russia and the Crimean Khanate during the 17th century, and the sole criteria used to label him as jewish was the fact he was born in Odessa. Or how Johann Stauss and other prominent people from Vienna and Austria are sometimes labeled as jewish, partly due to sloppy genealogical research.
I could go on forever listing individual cases, but my point is clear. Even today people are still falsely labeled as jewish in attempts to slur their character, including as polish jews. Do your own research and use reputable info instead of believing everything you hear. If you believe everything you hear you are as stupid as those who believe what the bank of poland said in 2007 that the polish settled jamestown instead of the english, or trust a military like israels that uses the motto strength through deception.
Peter Khan Zendran
Monday, April 13, 2009
Tracking shit u viewers
Recently I noticed people at shit u have been checking me out online as usual, and yes I have noticed them and yes I have watched back. It doesn't matter whether it is nigger brain hunter at 32 beaumont st in east providence, or chicken shit kennedy at 326 lloyd ave in providence, or fat fuckface enos at 11 milburn rd in east providence, or heebtards colla at 50 boylston in providence and tannenwald at 167 medway in providence, or lying cunt hanni at 47 nelson st in providence, you watch here, you are being watched. I mean, your life must suck to check out my blog and my sites outside of work. And don't think I know you are among those leaving anonymous harassing messages here and elsewhere for me. You watch me, I watch you, don't fuck with me.
Peter Z
Peter Z
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)