With the recent showing at the ANA in Boston and the behavior of coutries in Asia economically and politically one must take a serious look at the Bullion coinage those countries use, as it backs up their currency and is a keystone of their economies. Below is a review of the 5 Bullion issuing Asian countries in order of power and prominence.
CHINA Has been issuing Gold Pandas since 1982 in 1, ½, ¼, 1/10, and 1/20 oz sizes and Silver Pandas since 1983. The designs change every year, have a high purity and are in high demand around the World. Interestingly enough they are minted in Shanghai, where the Chinese government allows many private mints to operate and issue Panda coinage.
RUSSIA Has been issuing Gold ¼ oz. St George coins since 2006 and Silver St. George coins since 2009. Their using the ¼ size corresponds to the same size as the Soviet Chervonetz and Imperial Roubles in a size Russians understand. If Russia begins adding new Gold sizes this means they are getting serous, and Russia has vast untapped Gold mines to make those coins and is known not to waste resources.
KAZAKHSTAN Issued in 1996 Gold Silk Road coins and in 2009 Gold and Silver Irbis coins. Despite high purity of content Kazakhstan has trouble finding foreign distribution for those coins, one possible reason is fear of some foreign nation coming in to exploit kazakhstan’s economy and vast untapped resources.
IRAN Has been issuing Gold Azadi coins since 1979 when the replaced the Pahlavi. They are minted in 8, 4, and 2 gram sizes of the same Gold content as the Pahlavis. Though not popular abroad and struck infrequently since Ahmadinejad took office they provide backing for Iran’s currency. Interestingly enough the Azadi’s have made the Pahlavis and other Imperial Gold coinage more popular.
ISRAEL Issued a 1 oz. Gold Bullion coin in 2010 with an image of a holy site in Jerusalem and there are plans to start a series of Gold Bullion coins. The mintage is strictly limited and advertising, like the American premiere of this coin at the ANA in Boston, is targeted at jewish people and Zionists, which demonstrates the Israelis may be aware this Bullion coin may become a flop. Interestingly enough they are seeking buyers from people who lost money in the madoff ponzi scheme.
Oddly enough there has been no news of countries like India, Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, South Korea, Singapore, have not tried to issue Bullion coinage, if they did they could really have an impact on the World economy.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Der hundenkanzellor, the new world order, and shit u
Recently one of my few contacts at the watosn institute gave me some copies of their latest issue of briefings. On page 19 there is an article about watson's world leaders in residence. In that article hundenkanzellor gusenbauer is quoted as saying "The challenge ahead is to create a new world order without a world war." Even more telling is that the watson institute no longer puts copies of their briefings newsletters on their website. If this does not wake people up to the true evil nature of shit u then what will?
Peter Z
Peter Z
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Outcome of last night's governor's forum/debate
I was at last night's SOS governor's candidate forum on the Mental
Health system. It was good to see most of the candidates were allowed
to attend, and that people were able to find their way to the event.
I was suprised to notice the two leading candidates, Caprio and Chafee,
tended to be off focus during the event, while the other candidates
offered more creative answers. Despite the time constraints and some
well prepared questions no real curveball questions that would have put
the candidates on the spot were asked.
Recently when viewing the candidates websites which NAMI linked in their
notice I noticed something very attention getting. Today bill clinton
is in providence stumping for Caprio. While I have had issues with
Chafee over his connections to the clintons, including his brown
connections with the clintons and their associates, I certainly hope
Caprio is able to address issues concerning the clintons which other
candidates have not.
Also to my suprise I noticed the RISD security officer left seconds
after I made my early exit, the result of having left food in my freezer
for too long and not, unlike the snub I did wheholbrooke gave his speech
nearby in 2007, to disrespect anyone.
Peter Z
Health system. It was good to see most of the candidates were allowed
to attend, and that people were able to find their way to the event.
I was suprised to notice the two leading candidates, Caprio and Chafee,
tended to be off focus during the event, while the other candidates
offered more creative answers. Despite the time constraints and some
well prepared questions no real curveball questions that would have put
the candidates on the spot were asked.
Recently when viewing the candidates websites which NAMI linked in their
notice I noticed something very attention getting. Today bill clinton
is in providence stumping for Caprio. While I have had issues with
Chafee over his connections to the clintons, including his brown
connections with the clintons and their associates, I certainly hope
Caprio is able to address issues concerning the clintons which other
candidates have not.
Also to my suprise I noticed the RISD security officer left seconds
after I made my early exit, the result of having left food in my freezer
for too long and not, unlike the snub I did wheholbrooke gave his speech
nearby in 2007, to disrespect anyone.
Peter Z
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Iran more seriously imperiled than ever
Anyone who dismisses talk and news like this as sabre rattling is a fool. Right now the gangsters running america have redoubled their efforts to attack Iran. And notice the source of most of this, the zionist/jewish community spewing their lies and pissing cash to cover up their own criminal actions, be it in congress or in the military/industrial complex, or the media. Know that people like Castro who warn of acts like this do not make their words lightly, he understands that conflicts can be easily prevented, that countries like Iran have the right to use nuclear technology, be it for power or defense, and that the zionists and the goverments they hijacked, be it america or britain, are the real warmongers since the 19th century.
Peter Khan Zendran
Castro: War on Iran 'Imminent'
By Tom Melle
July 13, 2010 "Morning Star" -- Cuban revolutionary Fidel Castro warned on Monday that a US-Israeli attack on Iran is "imminent" and predicted that this could trigger a global nuclear war.
In a special appearance on state-run television for the first time in nearly a year, the Communist leader described US and Israeli sabre-rattling over Iran's civil nuclear energy programme as "the most serious crisis" on the international scene because "the Iranian government will not retreat."
"The Iranians have been preparing themselves for 30 years, and have acquired all the Russian and Chinese aeroplanes and weapons necessary for their defence," Mr Castro said.
"They are training all people between the ages of 12 and 60 - just the Guardians of the Revolution have a million members," he added.
And Mr Castro insisted that the US sank the South Korean Cheonan warship in order to justify an attack on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
He said that "in the face of a massive attack against Iran, North Korea will not wait to be attacked, and a nuclear war will also break out in that zone.
"When they decide to attack Iran, one war after the other will be unleashed," he declared.
The veteran Communist spoke out at a delicate time politically for Cuba, as it begins releasing 52 prisoners under a landmark deal brokered with Spanish officials and the Catholic church last week.
The men were all arrested in a crackdown on US-backed subversion in 2003.
The Origin of Wars
By Fidel Castro Ruz - granma.cu - July 11, 2010
I affirmed on July 4 that neither the United States nor Iran would give in; "one, due to the pride of the powerful, and the other, out of resistance to the yoke and the capacity to fight, as has occurred so many times in the history of humanity..."
In almost all wars, one of the parties wishes to avoid them, and sometimes, both. On this occasion, it would come about even though one of the parties does not wish it, as happened in the two World Wars in 1914 and 1939, with only 25 years of distance before the first outbreak and the second.
The slaughters were horrific, they would not have been unleashed without prior errors of calculation. The two parties were defending imperialist interests and they believed that they would obtain their objectives without the terrible cost that that implied.
In the case that concerns us: one of them is defending national, absolutely just interests. The other is pursuing illegitimate intentions and crude material interests.
If we analyze all the wars that have taken place, starting from the known history of our species, one of the parties has sought those objectives.
Any illusion that, on this occasion, such objectives will be reached without the most terrible of all wars is absolutely vain.
In one of the best articles published by the Global Research website on Thursday, July 1, signed by Rick Rozoff, he provides abundant indisputable arguments on the United States intentions, of which any well-informed person must be aware.
"... Victory can be attained when an adversary knows it is vulnerable to an instantaneous and undetectable, overwhelming and devastating attack without the ability to defend itself or retaliate," is what the United States thinks, according to the author.
"... A country which aspires to remain the only state in history to wield full spectrum military dominance on land, in the air, on the seas and in space."
"... To maintain and extend military bases and troops, aircraft carrier battle groups and strategic bombers on and to most every latitude and longitude. To do so with a post-World War II record war budget of $708 billion for next year."
It was "... the first country to develop and use nuclear weapons..."
"... the U.S. retains 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads and 2,200 (by some counts 3,500) more in storage and a triad of land, air and submarine delivery vehicles."
"The non-nuclear arsenal used for disabling and destroying the air defenses and strategic, potentially all major, military forces of other nations will consist of intercontinental ballistic missiles, adapted submarine-launched ballistic missiles, hypersonic cruise missiles and bombers, and super stealthy strategic bombers able to avoid detection by radar and thus evade ground- and air-based defenses."
Rozoff lists the many press conferences, meetings and statements of Joint Chiefs of Staff and high-ranking members of the government of the United States in the last few months.
He explains the commitments to NATO and the reinforced cooperation with Near East allies, primarily, read Israel. He says, "The U.S. is also intensifying space and cyber warfare programs with the potential to completely shut down other nations' military surveillance and command, control, communications, computer and intelligence systems, rendering them defenseless on any but the most basic tactical level."
He speaks of the signing in Prague, on April 8 of this year, of the new START Treaty between Russia and the United States, which "does not contain any constraints on current or planned U.S. conventional prompt global strike capability."
He refers to countless news items on the subject and illustrates the intentions of the United States with one overwhelming example.
He notes that "... 'The Department of Defense is currently exploring the full range of technologies and systems for a Conventional Prompt Global Strike (CPGS) capability that could provide the President more credible and technically suitable options for dealing with new and evolving threats."
I maintain the opinion that any president whosoever, not even the most expert military chief, would not have one minute to know what should be done if it was not already programmed on computers.
Imperturbably, Rozoff relates what the Global Security Network affirms in an analysis titled: "'Cost to test U.S. global-strike missile could reach $500 million,'" by Elaine Grossman.
"'The Obama administration has requested $239.9 million for prompt global strike research and development across the military services in fiscal 2011... If funding levels remain as anticipated into the coming years, the Pentagon will have spent some $2 billion on prompt global strike by the end of fiscal 2015, according to budget documents submitted last month to Capitol Hill.'"
"A terrifying scenario comparable to the effects of a PGS attack, in this case the sea-based version, appeared three years ago in Popular Mechanics:
"'In the Pacific, a nuclear-powered Ohio class submarine surfaces, ready for the president's command to launch. When the order comes, the sub shoots a 65-ton Trident II ballistic missile into the sky. Within 2 minutes, the missile is traveling at more than 20,000 ft. per second. Up and over the oceans and out of the atmosphere it soars for thousands of miles.
"'At the top of its parabola, hanging in space, the Trident's four warheads separate and begin their screaming descent down toward the planet.
"'Traveling as fast as 13,000 mph, the warheads are filled with scored tungsten rods with twice the strength of steel.
"'Just above the target, the warheads detonate, showering the area with thousands of rods-each one up to 12 times as destructive as a .50-caliber bullet. Anything within 3,000 sq. ft. of this whirling, metallic storm is obliterated.'"
Rozoff immediately explains the April 7 statement of General Leonid Ivashov, joint chief of staff of the Russian armed forces, made in a column entitled "Obama's nuclear surprise."
In that same column Ivashov, refers to the speech by the U.S. president in Prague last year: "The existence of thousands of nuclear weapons is the most dangerous legacy of the Cold War" and his signing of the START II agreement in that same city on April 8, Rozoff quotes the author, who stated:
"'No examples of sacrificial service of the U.S. elites to mankind or peoples of other countries can be discovered in the U.S. history over the past century. Would it be realistic to expect the advent of an African-American president to the White House to change the country's political philosophy traditionally aimed at achieving global dominance? Those believing that something like that is possible should try to realize why the U.S. the country with a military budget already greater than those of all other countries of the world combined continues spending enormous sums of money on preparations for war.'"
"... 'The Prompt Global Strike concept envisages a concentrated strike using several thousand precision conventional weapons in 2-4 hours that would completely destroy the critical infrastructures of the target country and thus force it to capitulate.'"
"'The Prompt Global Strike concept is meant to sustain the U.S. monopoly in the military sphere and to widen the gap between it and the rest of the world. Combined with the deployment of the missile defense supposed to keep the U.S. immune to retaliatory strikes from Russia and China, the Prompt Global Strike initiative is going to turn Washington into a modern era global dictator.'"
"'In essence, the new U.S. nuclear doctrine is an element of the novel U.S. security strategy that would be more adequately described as the strategy of total impunity. The U.S. is boosting its military budget, unleashing NATO as the global gendarme, and planning real-life exercise in Iran to test the efficiency of the Prompt Global Strike initiative in practice. At the same time, Washington is talking about the completely nuclear-free world.'"
In essence, Obama is trying to deceive the world by talking of a humanity free of nuclear weapons, which would be replaced by other extremely destructive ones, ideal for terrorizing state leaders and achieving the new strategy of total impunity.
The yankis believe that Iran's rendition is already close. The European Union is expected to announce a sanctions package of its own to be signed on July 26.
The last meeting of the 5+1 took place on July 2, after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad affirmed that "his country would return to talks at the end of August with the participation of Brazil and Turkey."
A high-ranking E.U. official "stated that neither Brazil nor Turkey will be invited to take part in talks, at least not at this level."
"Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki stated that he was in favor of defying international sanctions and continuing with the enriched uranium program."
From Tuesday, July 5, in the face of the European reiteration that they are to promote additional measures against Iran, this country has responded that it will not negotiate until September.
Every day the possibilities of overcoming the insurmountable obstacle are reducing further.
What is going to happen is so evident that it can be foreseen in an almost exact form.
For my part, I must make a self-criticism; I committed an error in affirming in the June 27 Reflection that the conflict would break out on the Thursday, Friday or at the latest Saturday. It was already known that Israeli warships were navigating toward that objective together with the yanki naval forces. The order to search Iranian merchant ships was already given.
However, I did not realize that there was a prior step: confirmation of the negation of permission for the inspection of its mercantile fleet on the part of Iran. In analyzing the torturous language of the Security Council imposing sanctions on that country, I did not notice that detail to give the inspection order full effect. It was the only thing missing.
The 60-day period given by the Security Council on June 9 to receive information on compliance with the Resolution expires on August 8.
But something really most lamentable happened. I was working on the latest material on the delicate issue drafted by the Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the said document did not contain two key paragraphs the last two of the abovementioned resolution which textually state:
"Requests within 90 days a report from the Director General of the IAEA on whether Iran has established full and sustained suspension of all activities mentioned in resolution 1737 (2006), as well as on the process of Iranian compliance with all the steps required by the IAEA Board of Governors and with other provisions of resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and of this resolution, to the IAEA Board of Governors and in parallel to the Security Council for its consideration;
"Affirms that it shall review Irans actions in light of the report referred to in paragraph 36 above, to be submitted within 90 days, and:
(a) that it shall suspend the implementation of measures if and for so long as Iran suspends all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development, as verified by the IAEA, to allow for negotiations in good faith in order to reach an early and mutually acceptable outcome;
(b) that it shall terminate the measures specified in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12 of resolution 1737 (2006), as well as in paragraphs 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of resolution 1747 (2007), paragraphs 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of resolution 1803 (2008), and in paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 and 24 above, as soon as it determines, following receipt of the report referred to in the paragraph above, that Iran has fully complied with its obligations under the relevant resolutions of the Security Council and met the requirements of the IAEA Board of Governors, as confirmed by the IAEA Board of Governors;
(c) that it shall, in the event that the report shows that Iran has not complied with resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and this resolution, adopt further appropriate measures under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations to persuade Iran to comply with these resolutions and the requirements of the IAEA, and underlines that further decisions will be required should such additional measures be necessary..."
A compañero from the Ministry, after the exhausting work of many hours at the machine making photocopies of all the documents, fell asleep. My eagerness in seeking out information and exchanging points of view on these delicate issues, made it possible for me to discover this omission.
From my point of view, the United States and its NATO allies have said their last word. Two powerful states with authority and prestige did not exercise their right to veto the perfidious U.N. resolution.
It was the only possibility of gaining time to seek some formula for saving the peace, an objective that would have afforded them greater authority to continue fighting for it.
Today, everything is hanging from a tenuous thread.
My principal intention was to advise international public opinion of what was occurring.
I have in part achieved that by observing what was taking place, as a political leader who, for many years, has been confronting the empire, its blockades and its indescribable crimes. But I am not doing it out of revenge.
I am not hesitating to run the risks of compromising my modest moral authority.
I shall continue writing Reflections on the subject. There will be a number more after this one in order to continue going more profoundly into it in July and August, unless some incident occurs to trigger the deadly weapons currently pointed at each other.
I have very much enjoyed the final games of the World Cup and the volleyball games, in which our valiant team is marching at the head of its group in the World League of that sport.
Fidel Castro Ruz - July 11, 2010 - 8:14 p.m.
'US will attack Iran if it must'
By HERB KEINON
07/07/2010 12:11
Senators in Jerusalem to discuss Middle East tensions.
Talkbacks (44)
There is wide support in Congress for using all means to keep Iran from
becoming a nuclear power, “through diplomatic and economic sanctions
if we possibly can, through military actions if we must,” visiting US
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) said Wednesday in Jerusalem.
Lieberman, flanked at a Jerusalem press conference by his senate
colleagues John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), used very tough
language, saying the words “military action” in regards to stopping
Iran’s nuclear program. Most US officials opt to tiptoe around the
subject, saying “no options are off the table.”
Lieberman said that “a certain trumpet needs to sounded here for the
Iranian regime to hear.”
He said the sanctions Congress recently passed against Iran were meant
to signal to Teheran to “negotiate the end of their nuclear program
and re-entry into the civilized world, if that is possible. But if not,
they should know that when Congress says it is unacceptable to get
nuclear weapons, we mean it. We hope economic and diplomatic power will
work, but if we must use force, that must remain a very active
option.”
Regarding Tuesday’s friendly meeting in Washington between Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama, Lieberman –
based on reports he heard from people there – said “it was a
positive meeting, and we can say with some encouragement that the
relationship between the US and Israel is back on track.”
Lieberman, acknowledging that the past year was a “difficult one” in
the US-Israel relationship, said that even during this period “the
members of Congress across party lines continued to both feel and
express strong support for the security of the State of Israel, and for
the relationship.”
Graham was even blunter.
“The Congress has Israel’s back,” he said, “and never
misunderstand that. Whatever relationship problems we have had in the
past, it has never seeped over into Congress. The Congress has been
united in protection of one of our best allies in the world, the State
of Israel.”
Regarding another American ally, Turkey, McCain – referring to both
Ankara’s vote against Iran sanctions at the UN and its hostile
rhetoric toward Israel – said he has been “disappointed recently”
by Turkey’s “actions and words.”
At the same time, he said, Turkey is an old and close ally with whom the
US has common interests.
“I hope that at some point the Turkish leadership would lower the
rhetoric, reduce it to the point where we can try to solve differences
in a quiet and diplomatic way,” McCain said.
Asked what would happen to US-Turkish ties if Ankara severed, as it has
threatened to do, its ties with Israel, McCain replied, “obviously it
wouldn’t be helpful. I hope this won’t be the case. I hope that
there will be conversations.” Saying that the Israeli-Turkish
relationship has “contributed to stability in the Middle East,”
McCain said he found the situation “disturbing,” and said he hoped
the US could play an “interlocutor role to bridge some of these
differences.”
Fundamentally, McCain said, Turkey remains a secular nation that has
“contributed enormously to peace in the region and the world.”
All three senators, who met during their two-day stay with Defense
Minister Ehud Barak and Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi,
as well as with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad,
praised the US-trained PA security forces.
McCain, in an apparent reference to talk about putting PA security
forces at border crossings from Israel into Gaza, said the willingness
of Israel to discuss this issue showed the confidence Israel had in
these forces as well.
Peter Khan Zendran
Castro: War on Iran 'Imminent'
By Tom Melle
July 13, 2010 "Morning Star" -- Cuban revolutionary Fidel Castro warned on Monday that a US-Israeli attack on Iran is "imminent" and predicted that this could trigger a global nuclear war.
In a special appearance on state-run television for the first time in nearly a year, the Communist leader described US and Israeli sabre-rattling over Iran's civil nuclear energy programme as "the most serious crisis" on the international scene because "the Iranian government will not retreat."
"The Iranians have been preparing themselves for 30 years, and have acquired all the Russian and Chinese aeroplanes and weapons necessary for their defence," Mr Castro said.
"They are training all people between the ages of 12 and 60 - just the Guardians of the Revolution have a million members," he added.
And Mr Castro insisted that the US sank the South Korean Cheonan warship in order to justify an attack on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
He said that "in the face of a massive attack against Iran, North Korea will not wait to be attacked, and a nuclear war will also break out in that zone.
"When they decide to attack Iran, one war after the other will be unleashed," he declared.
The veteran Communist spoke out at a delicate time politically for Cuba, as it begins releasing 52 prisoners under a landmark deal brokered with Spanish officials and the Catholic church last week.
The men were all arrested in a crackdown on US-backed subversion in 2003.
The Origin of Wars
By Fidel Castro Ruz - granma.cu - July 11, 2010
I affirmed on July 4 that neither the United States nor Iran would give in; "one, due to the pride of the powerful, and the other, out of resistance to the yoke and the capacity to fight, as has occurred so many times in the history of humanity..."
In almost all wars, one of the parties wishes to avoid them, and sometimes, both. On this occasion, it would come about even though one of the parties does not wish it, as happened in the two World Wars in 1914 and 1939, with only 25 years of distance before the first outbreak and the second.
The slaughters were horrific, they would not have been unleashed without prior errors of calculation. The two parties were defending imperialist interests and they believed that they would obtain their objectives without the terrible cost that that implied.
In the case that concerns us: one of them is defending national, absolutely just interests. The other is pursuing illegitimate intentions and crude material interests.
If we analyze all the wars that have taken place, starting from the known history of our species, one of the parties has sought those objectives.
Any illusion that, on this occasion, such objectives will be reached without the most terrible of all wars is absolutely vain.
In one of the best articles published by the Global Research website on Thursday, July 1, signed by Rick Rozoff, he provides abundant indisputable arguments on the United States intentions, of which any well-informed person must be aware.
"... Victory can be attained when an adversary knows it is vulnerable to an instantaneous and undetectable, overwhelming and devastating attack without the ability to defend itself or retaliate," is what the United States thinks, according to the author.
"... A country which aspires to remain the only state in history to wield full spectrum military dominance on land, in the air, on the seas and in space."
"... To maintain and extend military bases and troops, aircraft carrier battle groups and strategic bombers on and to most every latitude and longitude. To do so with a post-World War II record war budget of $708 billion for next year."
It was "... the first country to develop and use nuclear weapons..."
"... the U.S. retains 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads and 2,200 (by some counts 3,500) more in storage and a triad of land, air and submarine delivery vehicles."
"The non-nuclear arsenal used for disabling and destroying the air defenses and strategic, potentially all major, military forces of other nations will consist of intercontinental ballistic missiles, adapted submarine-launched ballistic missiles, hypersonic cruise missiles and bombers, and super stealthy strategic bombers able to avoid detection by radar and thus evade ground- and air-based defenses."
Rozoff lists the many press conferences, meetings and statements of Joint Chiefs of Staff and high-ranking members of the government of the United States in the last few months.
He explains the commitments to NATO and the reinforced cooperation with Near East allies, primarily, read Israel. He says, "The U.S. is also intensifying space and cyber warfare programs with the potential to completely shut down other nations' military surveillance and command, control, communications, computer and intelligence systems, rendering them defenseless on any but the most basic tactical level."
He speaks of the signing in Prague, on April 8 of this year, of the new START Treaty between Russia and the United States, which "does not contain any constraints on current or planned U.S. conventional prompt global strike capability."
He refers to countless news items on the subject and illustrates the intentions of the United States with one overwhelming example.
He notes that "... 'The Department of Defense is currently exploring the full range of technologies and systems for a Conventional Prompt Global Strike (CPGS) capability that could provide the President more credible and technically suitable options for dealing with new and evolving threats."
I maintain the opinion that any president whosoever, not even the most expert military chief, would not have one minute to know what should be done if it was not already programmed on computers.
Imperturbably, Rozoff relates what the Global Security Network affirms in an analysis titled: "'Cost to test U.S. global-strike missile could reach $500 million,'" by Elaine Grossman.
"'The Obama administration has requested $239.9 million for prompt global strike research and development across the military services in fiscal 2011... If funding levels remain as anticipated into the coming years, the Pentagon will have spent some $2 billion on prompt global strike by the end of fiscal 2015, according to budget documents submitted last month to Capitol Hill.'"
"A terrifying scenario comparable to the effects of a PGS attack, in this case the sea-based version, appeared three years ago in Popular Mechanics:
"'In the Pacific, a nuclear-powered Ohio class submarine surfaces, ready for the president's command to launch. When the order comes, the sub shoots a 65-ton Trident II ballistic missile into the sky. Within 2 minutes, the missile is traveling at more than 20,000 ft. per second. Up and over the oceans and out of the atmosphere it soars for thousands of miles.
"'At the top of its parabola, hanging in space, the Trident's four warheads separate and begin their screaming descent down toward the planet.
"'Traveling as fast as 13,000 mph, the warheads are filled with scored tungsten rods with twice the strength of steel.
"'Just above the target, the warheads detonate, showering the area with thousands of rods-each one up to 12 times as destructive as a .50-caliber bullet. Anything within 3,000 sq. ft. of this whirling, metallic storm is obliterated.'"
Rozoff immediately explains the April 7 statement of General Leonid Ivashov, joint chief of staff of the Russian armed forces, made in a column entitled "Obama's nuclear surprise."
In that same column Ivashov, refers to the speech by the U.S. president in Prague last year: "The existence of thousands of nuclear weapons is the most dangerous legacy of the Cold War" and his signing of the START II agreement in that same city on April 8, Rozoff quotes the author, who stated:
"'No examples of sacrificial service of the U.S. elites to mankind or peoples of other countries can be discovered in the U.S. history over the past century. Would it be realistic to expect the advent of an African-American president to the White House to change the country's political philosophy traditionally aimed at achieving global dominance? Those believing that something like that is possible should try to realize why the U.S. the country with a military budget already greater than those of all other countries of the world combined continues spending enormous sums of money on preparations for war.'"
"... 'The Prompt Global Strike concept envisages a concentrated strike using several thousand precision conventional weapons in 2-4 hours that would completely destroy the critical infrastructures of the target country and thus force it to capitulate.'"
"'The Prompt Global Strike concept is meant to sustain the U.S. monopoly in the military sphere and to widen the gap between it and the rest of the world. Combined with the deployment of the missile defense supposed to keep the U.S. immune to retaliatory strikes from Russia and China, the Prompt Global Strike initiative is going to turn Washington into a modern era global dictator.'"
"'In essence, the new U.S. nuclear doctrine is an element of the novel U.S. security strategy that would be more adequately described as the strategy of total impunity. The U.S. is boosting its military budget, unleashing NATO as the global gendarme, and planning real-life exercise in Iran to test the efficiency of the Prompt Global Strike initiative in practice. At the same time, Washington is talking about the completely nuclear-free world.'"
In essence, Obama is trying to deceive the world by talking of a humanity free of nuclear weapons, which would be replaced by other extremely destructive ones, ideal for terrorizing state leaders and achieving the new strategy of total impunity.
The yankis believe that Iran's rendition is already close. The European Union is expected to announce a sanctions package of its own to be signed on July 26.
The last meeting of the 5+1 took place on July 2, after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad affirmed that "his country would return to talks at the end of August with the participation of Brazil and Turkey."
A high-ranking E.U. official "stated that neither Brazil nor Turkey will be invited to take part in talks, at least not at this level."
"Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki stated that he was in favor of defying international sanctions and continuing with the enriched uranium program."
From Tuesday, July 5, in the face of the European reiteration that they are to promote additional measures against Iran, this country has responded that it will not negotiate until September.
Every day the possibilities of overcoming the insurmountable obstacle are reducing further.
What is going to happen is so evident that it can be foreseen in an almost exact form.
For my part, I must make a self-criticism; I committed an error in affirming in the June 27 Reflection that the conflict would break out on the Thursday, Friday or at the latest Saturday. It was already known that Israeli warships were navigating toward that objective together with the yanki naval forces. The order to search Iranian merchant ships was already given.
However, I did not realize that there was a prior step: confirmation of the negation of permission for the inspection of its mercantile fleet on the part of Iran. In analyzing the torturous language of the Security Council imposing sanctions on that country, I did not notice that detail to give the inspection order full effect. It was the only thing missing.
The 60-day period given by the Security Council on June 9 to receive information on compliance with the Resolution expires on August 8.
But something really most lamentable happened. I was working on the latest material on the delicate issue drafted by the Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the said document did not contain two key paragraphs the last two of the abovementioned resolution which textually state:
"Requests within 90 days a report from the Director General of the IAEA on whether Iran has established full and sustained suspension of all activities mentioned in resolution 1737 (2006), as well as on the process of Iranian compliance with all the steps required by the IAEA Board of Governors and with other provisions of resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and of this resolution, to the IAEA Board of Governors and in parallel to the Security Council for its consideration;
"Affirms that it shall review Irans actions in light of the report referred to in paragraph 36 above, to be submitted within 90 days, and:
(a) that it shall suspend the implementation of measures if and for so long as Iran suspends all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development, as verified by the IAEA, to allow for negotiations in good faith in order to reach an early and mutually acceptable outcome;
(b) that it shall terminate the measures specified in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12 of resolution 1737 (2006), as well as in paragraphs 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of resolution 1747 (2007), paragraphs 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of resolution 1803 (2008), and in paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 and 24 above, as soon as it determines, following receipt of the report referred to in the paragraph above, that Iran has fully complied with its obligations under the relevant resolutions of the Security Council and met the requirements of the IAEA Board of Governors, as confirmed by the IAEA Board of Governors;
(c) that it shall, in the event that the report shows that Iran has not complied with resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and this resolution, adopt further appropriate measures under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations to persuade Iran to comply with these resolutions and the requirements of the IAEA, and underlines that further decisions will be required should such additional measures be necessary..."
A compañero from the Ministry, after the exhausting work of many hours at the machine making photocopies of all the documents, fell asleep. My eagerness in seeking out information and exchanging points of view on these delicate issues, made it possible for me to discover this omission.
From my point of view, the United States and its NATO allies have said their last word. Two powerful states with authority and prestige did not exercise their right to veto the perfidious U.N. resolution.
It was the only possibility of gaining time to seek some formula for saving the peace, an objective that would have afforded them greater authority to continue fighting for it.
Today, everything is hanging from a tenuous thread.
My principal intention was to advise international public opinion of what was occurring.
I have in part achieved that by observing what was taking place, as a political leader who, for many years, has been confronting the empire, its blockades and its indescribable crimes. But I am not doing it out of revenge.
I am not hesitating to run the risks of compromising my modest moral authority.
I shall continue writing Reflections on the subject. There will be a number more after this one in order to continue going more profoundly into it in July and August, unless some incident occurs to trigger the deadly weapons currently pointed at each other.
I have very much enjoyed the final games of the World Cup and the volleyball games, in which our valiant team is marching at the head of its group in the World League of that sport.
Fidel Castro Ruz - July 11, 2010 - 8:14 p.m.
'US will attack Iran if it must'
By HERB KEINON
07/07/2010 12:11
Senators in Jerusalem to discuss Middle East tensions.
Talkbacks (44)
There is wide support in Congress for using all means to keep Iran from
becoming a nuclear power, “through diplomatic and economic sanctions
if we possibly can, through military actions if we must,” visiting US
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) said Wednesday in Jerusalem.
Lieberman, flanked at a Jerusalem press conference by his senate
colleagues John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), used very tough
language, saying the words “military action” in regards to stopping
Iran’s nuclear program. Most US officials opt to tiptoe around the
subject, saying “no options are off the table.”
Lieberman said that “a certain trumpet needs to sounded here for the
Iranian regime to hear.”
He said the sanctions Congress recently passed against Iran were meant
to signal to Teheran to “negotiate the end of their nuclear program
and re-entry into the civilized world, if that is possible. But if not,
they should know that when Congress says it is unacceptable to get
nuclear weapons, we mean it. We hope economic and diplomatic power will
work, but if we must use force, that must remain a very active
option.”
Regarding Tuesday’s friendly meeting in Washington between Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama, Lieberman –
based on reports he heard from people there – said “it was a
positive meeting, and we can say with some encouragement that the
relationship between the US and Israel is back on track.”
Lieberman, acknowledging that the past year was a “difficult one” in
the US-Israel relationship, said that even during this period “the
members of Congress across party lines continued to both feel and
express strong support for the security of the State of Israel, and for
the relationship.”
Graham was even blunter.
“The Congress has Israel’s back,” he said, “and never
misunderstand that. Whatever relationship problems we have had in the
past, it has never seeped over into Congress. The Congress has been
united in protection of one of our best allies in the world, the State
of Israel.”
Regarding another American ally, Turkey, McCain – referring to both
Ankara’s vote against Iran sanctions at the UN and its hostile
rhetoric toward Israel – said he has been “disappointed recently”
by Turkey’s “actions and words.”
At the same time, he said, Turkey is an old and close ally with whom the
US has common interests.
“I hope that at some point the Turkish leadership would lower the
rhetoric, reduce it to the point where we can try to solve differences
in a quiet and diplomatic way,” McCain said.
Asked what would happen to US-Turkish ties if Ankara severed, as it has
threatened to do, its ties with Israel, McCain replied, “obviously it
wouldn’t be helpful. I hope this won’t be the case. I hope that
there will be conversations.” Saying that the Israeli-Turkish
relationship has “contributed to stability in the Middle East,”
McCain said he found the situation “disturbing,” and said he hoped
the US could play an “interlocutor role to bridge some of these
differences.”
Fundamentally, McCain said, Turkey remains a secular nation that has
“contributed enormously to peace in the region and the world.”
All three senators, who met during their two-day stay with Defense
Minister Ehud Barak and Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi,
as well as with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad,
praised the US-trained PA security forces.
McCain, in an apparent reference to talk about putting PA security
forces at border crossings from Israel into Gaza, said the willingness
of Israel to discuss this issue showed the confidence Israel had in
these forces as well.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Concerns about censorship during gubenatorial campaign
On April 29, 2010 while at the RI state house I received an invitation
to a RI Gubernatorial debate about the mental health system which was to
take place on June 24 at 6PM at Butler Hospital’s ray conference
center and was sponsored by NAMI. When I went there on June 24 I found
the event had been cancelled at the last minute, which I found
suspicious as there was no public notice of this. A few days later I
received an invitation via e-mail to another such debate which is to
take place on July 28 at the RISD Museum’s Metcalf auditorium at
5:30PM. Upon receiving this invitation I looked it over and found some
things of concern.
1. This is being held at a place with no connection to the mental
health system, is difficult to find, has poor parking, and is awkwardly
cramped, thus restricting the number of people who could attend such an
event.
2. Only 4 of the candidates are invited, with Moffit and Block not
attending, why this omission is anyone’s guess.
3. The invitation asks that people reserve in advance and that
questions they plan to ask to the candidates be submitted beforehand.
My concerns are that this is being done is to prevent the public from
presenting their issues freely and to censor the facts from the
candidates, some of whom have created problems for people who have dealt
with the mental health system. If anything this does not appear to be a
fair forum.
to a RI Gubernatorial debate about the mental health system which was to
take place on June 24 at 6PM at Butler Hospital’s ray conference
center and was sponsored by NAMI. When I went there on June 24 I found
the event had been cancelled at the last minute, which I found
suspicious as there was no public notice of this. A few days later I
received an invitation via e-mail to another such debate which is to
take place on July 28 at the RISD Museum’s Metcalf auditorium at
5:30PM. Upon receiving this invitation I looked it over and found some
things of concern.
1. This is being held at a place with no connection to the mental
health system, is difficult to find, has poor parking, and is awkwardly
cramped, thus restricting the number of people who could attend such an
event.
2. Only 4 of the candidates are invited, with Moffit and Block not
attending, why this omission is anyone’s guess.
3. The invitation asks that people reserve in advance and that
questions they plan to ask to the candidates be submitted beforehand.
My concerns are that this is being done is to prevent the public from
presenting their issues freely and to censor the facts from the
candidates, some of whom have created problems for people who have dealt
with the mental health system. If anything this does not appear to be a
fair forum.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Iran seriously imperiled over nuclear program by it's "allies"
This came out in the Russian press around the same time it was announced
on the news last night that medvedev supposedly said Russia has concerns
over Iran's nuclear program. This sudden about face by Arab nations
long friendly with Iran and by Russia must be taken as a serious
sanctioning of invasion. Consider at this point Iran is most
vulnerable, as amrikan/zionist forces may decide to go for broke in an
all out invasion and would use the slightest pretext to do so.
Peter Khan Zendran
Arab World Supports War Against Iran?
09.07.2010 Source: Pravda.Ru URL:
http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/114175-arab_world_iran-0
Israeli hawks that urge to strike preventive blows on Iranian nuclear
objects have found a radical ally in the Arab world. Yousef al-Otaiba,
the United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the USA, stated that positive
sides of the military solution to the Iranian nuclear problem outweighed
possible negative results of the use of force in the struggle against
the nuclear program of Iran, The Washington Times wrote.
The UAE Ambassador straightforwardly supported the use of military force
in case economic sanctions against Iran are proved inefficient. The
official acknowledged that the use for force against the Islamic state,
a direct neighbor and a trade partner of the UAE, would lead to severe
economic consequences. The UAE’s trade turnover with Iran makes up $12
billion a year. Such a measure will also trigger massive protest actions
in the Muslim world, the official said.
"We cannot live with a nuclear Iran," the envoy said at a conference in
Aspen, Colorado. "I am willing to absorb what takes place at the expense
of the security of the UAE,” he added.
Russia Today: “We cannot live with a nuclear Iran” – Arab diplomat
The diplomat said in an interview with the Atlantic Magazine that many
Arab states in the region would turn their backs on Washington and move
towards Teheran in the event the US administration failed to stop Iran.
Otaiba was quoted as saying that he "absolutely" wanted the US to use
force to halt Iran's nuclear program.
"Countries in the region view the Iran threat very differently," he
said. "I can only speak for the UAE, but talk of containment and
deterrence really concerns me and makes me very nervous. Iran doesn't
have nuclear power now but … what makes me think that once they have a
nuclear program, we are going to be able to be more successful in
containing them?"
He also said that Iran’s nuclear program posed a much bigger threat to
the UAE than to the USA. “You’re seven thousand miles away. It
threatens your assets and the peaceful process in the region, it may
disrupt the balance of forces, but it does not threat your existence,”
he added.
The remarks from the UAE’s high-ranking official sparked harsh
criticism in Teheran.
"I hope the government of the UAE will correct this viewpoint," said
Kazem Jalali, spokesman for the Iranian parliament's National Security
and Foreign Policy Committee.
Jalali also said that the Iranians may no longer travel to the United
Arab Emirates to avoid possible ill attitude on the part of the UEA
authorities. The money, which the Iranians spend during their visits to
the Emirates, helps the UAE endure the economic crisis, the official
added.
Iran now intends to cut economic ties with the UAE. The head of the
Iranian Board of Trade stated Wednesday that the level of commercial
ties with the Emirates would be cut. The ties will be cut in response to
the UAE’s decision to execute the UN Security Council resolution about
the new sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
Last week, the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates ordered to
freeze 41 bank accounts of Iranian companies and natural persons in
order to implement the new sanctions against Iran. In June, the
financial authorities of Dubai informed the companies located in free
economic zones of the emirate about the need of taking precautionary
measures during operations with Iranian banks.
Economic sanctions do not scare Iran. The living standard in this
country has never been high. The Iranians can endure a lot, even if the
sanctions make their lives even worse.
Some “hotheads” in this nation may take UAE official’s remarks in
Washington as a reason for taking actions with unpredictable
consequences. US Senator Josef Lieberman also stated during his recent
visit to Israel that the US Congress was discussing an opportunity for
using military power against Iran to make the nation shut down the
nuclear program.
It is worthy of note that Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Foreign Secretary
of Saudi Arabia, shares the above-mentioned opinions expressed by Yousef
al-Otaiba. The sanctions were a long-term solution to the Iranian
nuclear dispute and Saudi Arabia country wanted an “immediate”
resolution, Faisal said during Hillary Clinton’s visit to Saudi
Arabia.
John Bolton, the former US Ambassador to the UN believes that Al-Otaiba
reflected the opinion of all leaders of Arab states in the Persian Gulf.
The United States has been increasing its military presence in the
Persian Gulf. Israeli submarines and missiles appeared in its waters as
well. The current state of affairs in the region reminds the possible
scenario of preparations to the so-called non-contact war, which NATO
conducted in Yugoslavia in 1999.
It is quite possible that the unprecedented remarks from the UAE
ambassador will start verbal artillery preparations to the real war in
the Gulf.
Ivan Tulyakov
Pravda.Ru
Read the original in Russian
© 1999-2009. «PRAVDA.Ru». When reproducing our materials in whole or
in part, hyperlink to PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views
of the authors do not always coincide with the point of view of
PRAVDA.Ru's editors.
on the news last night that medvedev supposedly said Russia has concerns
over Iran's nuclear program. This sudden about face by Arab nations
long friendly with Iran and by Russia must be taken as a serious
sanctioning of invasion. Consider at this point Iran is most
vulnerable, as amrikan/zionist forces may decide to go for broke in an
all out invasion and would use the slightest pretext to do so.
Peter Khan Zendran
Arab World Supports War Against Iran?
09.07.2010 Source: Pravda.Ru URL:
http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/114175-arab_world_iran-0
Israeli hawks that urge to strike preventive blows on Iranian nuclear
objects have found a radical ally in the Arab world. Yousef al-Otaiba,
the United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the USA, stated that positive
sides of the military solution to the Iranian nuclear problem outweighed
possible negative results of the use of force in the struggle against
the nuclear program of Iran, The Washington Times wrote.
The UAE Ambassador straightforwardly supported the use of military force
in case economic sanctions against Iran are proved inefficient. The
official acknowledged that the use for force against the Islamic state,
a direct neighbor and a trade partner of the UAE, would lead to severe
economic consequences. The UAE’s trade turnover with Iran makes up $12
billion a year. Such a measure will also trigger massive protest actions
in the Muslim world, the official said.
"We cannot live with a nuclear Iran," the envoy said at a conference in
Aspen, Colorado. "I am willing to absorb what takes place at the expense
of the security of the UAE,” he added.
Russia Today: “We cannot live with a nuclear Iran” – Arab diplomat
The diplomat said in an interview with the Atlantic Magazine that many
Arab states in the region would turn their backs on Washington and move
towards Teheran in the event the US administration failed to stop Iran.
Otaiba was quoted as saying that he "absolutely" wanted the US to use
force to halt Iran's nuclear program.
"Countries in the region view the Iran threat very differently," he
said. "I can only speak for the UAE, but talk of containment and
deterrence really concerns me and makes me very nervous. Iran doesn't
have nuclear power now but … what makes me think that once they have a
nuclear program, we are going to be able to be more successful in
containing them?"
He also said that Iran’s nuclear program posed a much bigger threat to
the UAE than to the USA. “You’re seven thousand miles away. It
threatens your assets and the peaceful process in the region, it may
disrupt the balance of forces, but it does not threat your existence,”
he added.
The remarks from the UAE’s high-ranking official sparked harsh
criticism in Teheran.
"I hope the government of the UAE will correct this viewpoint," said
Kazem Jalali, spokesman for the Iranian parliament's National Security
and Foreign Policy Committee.
Jalali also said that the Iranians may no longer travel to the United
Arab Emirates to avoid possible ill attitude on the part of the UEA
authorities. The money, which the Iranians spend during their visits to
the Emirates, helps the UAE endure the economic crisis, the official
added.
Iran now intends to cut economic ties with the UAE. The head of the
Iranian Board of Trade stated Wednesday that the level of commercial
ties with the Emirates would be cut. The ties will be cut in response to
the UAE’s decision to execute the UN Security Council resolution about
the new sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
Last week, the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates ordered to
freeze 41 bank accounts of Iranian companies and natural persons in
order to implement the new sanctions against Iran. In June, the
financial authorities of Dubai informed the companies located in free
economic zones of the emirate about the need of taking precautionary
measures during operations with Iranian banks.
Economic sanctions do not scare Iran. The living standard in this
country has never been high. The Iranians can endure a lot, even if the
sanctions make their lives even worse.
Some “hotheads” in this nation may take UAE official’s remarks in
Washington as a reason for taking actions with unpredictable
consequences. US Senator Josef Lieberman also stated during his recent
visit to Israel that the US Congress was discussing an opportunity for
using military power against Iran to make the nation shut down the
nuclear program.
It is worthy of note that Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Foreign Secretary
of Saudi Arabia, shares the above-mentioned opinions expressed by Yousef
al-Otaiba. The sanctions were a long-term solution to the Iranian
nuclear dispute and Saudi Arabia country wanted an “immediate”
resolution, Faisal said during Hillary Clinton’s visit to Saudi
Arabia.
John Bolton, the former US Ambassador to the UN believes that Al-Otaiba
reflected the opinion of all leaders of Arab states in the Persian Gulf.
The United States has been increasing its military presence in the
Persian Gulf. Israeli submarines and missiles appeared in its waters as
well. The current state of affairs in the region reminds the possible
scenario of preparations to the so-called non-contact war, which NATO
conducted in Yugoslavia in 1999.
It is quite possible that the unprecedented remarks from the UAE
ambassador will start verbal artillery preparations to the real war in
the Gulf.
Ivan Tulyakov
Pravda.Ru
Read the original in Russian
© 1999-2009. «PRAVDA.Ru». When reproducing our materials in whole or
in part, hyperlink to PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views
of the authors do not always coincide with the point of view of
PRAVDA.Ru's editors.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Zendran inheritance dispute update
Recently some pieces of news regarding the status of washington trust and it’s behaviors have surfaced.
First, the location washington trust vacated at 180 washington st during December 5-8 2008 has now been purchased by Coastway. That is the same location which pressed charges against me in 2006, the proceedings of which I have detailed too well. Oddly enough, washington trust does not put the details of their dropping that location on their site.
Online discrepancies led me to investigate washington trust’s Wellesley MA asset. In 2005 washington trust acquired Weston financial, however their website does not specify what kind of services they offer so I went there in person to find out. Oddly enough they had no washington trust paraphernalia there, despite the fact that washingotn trust owns them outright, as they told me. When they asked me the purpose of my wanting Zendran inheritance dispute update
to know more and mentioned my inheritance/trust dispute and current judicial probe they first thought I was joking until I showed them the contact info of the Judge investigating my situation and the file numbers for the court cases from 2006-7, which they claimed they knew nothing about. Oddly when leaving I spotted a Wellesley pd car at the corner of Worcester and William Sts. which was not there when I first entered the business park where Weston financial is located.
Another reason for my visit, which I did not mention to them at the bank, was learning of an incident in December 2009 leslie yeransian, who I was close to, had $1000 stolen from her in a bank transfer in Wellesley Hills, details of which can be found here
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/transfer-stolen-c286193.html
What is most noticeable when one looks closely is that those two locations are close by, and the fact that Wellesley is where washinbgton trust decided to begin expanding into Mass. Everyone in the legal situation I have mentioned this to believes this was no coincidence, noting that not only did this coincide with washington trust’s move from the abovementioned location but with the open letter I put on my blog to leslie, namely whoever was responsible for messing with leslie’s finances there is also responsible for messing with me, and it points in the direction of washington trust. I even paid the people at bank of America Wellesley hills a visit, they were so nosy, knew their regulars well, and many people there didn’t know simple banking like how to make change.
Peter Z
First, the location washington trust vacated at 180 washington st during December 5-8 2008 has now been purchased by Coastway. That is the same location which pressed charges against me in 2006, the proceedings of which I have detailed too well. Oddly enough, washington trust does not put the details of their dropping that location on their site.
Online discrepancies led me to investigate washington trust’s Wellesley MA asset. In 2005 washington trust acquired Weston financial, however their website does not specify what kind of services they offer so I went there in person to find out. Oddly enough they had no washington trust paraphernalia there, despite the fact that washingotn trust owns them outright, as they told me. When they asked me the purpose of my wanting Zendran inheritance dispute update
to know more and mentioned my inheritance/trust dispute and current judicial probe they first thought I was joking until I showed them the contact info of the Judge investigating my situation and the file numbers for the court cases from 2006-7, which they claimed they knew nothing about. Oddly when leaving I spotted a Wellesley pd car at the corner of Worcester and William Sts. which was not there when I first entered the business park where Weston financial is located.
Another reason for my visit, which I did not mention to them at the bank, was learning of an incident in December 2009 leslie yeransian, who I was close to, had $1000 stolen from her in a bank transfer in Wellesley Hills, details of which can be found here
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/transfer-stolen-c286193.html
What is most noticeable when one looks closely is that those two locations are close by, and the fact that Wellesley is where washinbgton trust decided to begin expanding into Mass. Everyone in the legal situation I have mentioned this to believes this was no coincidence, noting that not only did this coincide with washington trust’s move from the abovementioned location but with the open letter I put on my blog to leslie, namely whoever was responsible for messing with leslie’s finances there is also responsible for messing with me, and it points in the direction of washington trust. I even paid the people at bank of America Wellesley hills a visit, they were so nosy, knew their regulars well, and many people there didn’t know simple banking like how to make change.
Peter Z
Sunday, May 30, 2010
The good, bad, and ugly of shit u’s commencement
Recently I attended events involving brown’s commencement and had interesting experiences.
The good; I managed to find decent food at most events. Plus Dr. Khrushchev was glad to see me on brown campus again, telling me I did the right thing in April 2008. Interestingly enough most people remembered me.
The bad; There was a thunderstorm, and though it was nice to see the shitings there get soaked I had to deal with it as well.
The ugly; The shit u pigs would stop what they were doing when they would see me and observe. They can’t stand the fact the law is now on my side and not theirs, not to mention their dirty deeds have come to light.
Peter Z
The good; I managed to find decent food at most events. Plus Dr. Khrushchev was glad to see me on brown campus again, telling me I did the right thing in April 2008. Interestingly enough most people remembered me.
The bad; There was a thunderstorm, and though it was nice to see the shitings there get soaked I had to deal with it as well.
The ugly; The shit u pigs would stop what they were doing when they would see me and observe. They can’t stand the fact the law is now on my side and not theirs, not to mention their dirty deeds have come to light.
Peter Z
Saturday, April 24, 2010
The Truth about the armenian genocide
Recently I attended some armenian genocide and cultural events I was invited to. I went in a neutral frame of mind, as my paternal grandmother’s father served in the Ottoman military who’s service included killing armenians. If there was one thing that stood out at those events, and whenever armenians commemorate their culture and the genocide they infuse it with myths of their own making, even worse than the jews, and behave so insufferably that whatever feelings of sympathy one expresses come from coercion and one feels that the “sufferings” of armenians are their own fault, which they in truth are. Here I will clarify the myths of the armenian genocide which the armenians make part of their own culture.
One thing the armenians throw around is that they are persecuted because they are christian. Peope who know history know that the romans forced the armenians to convert to the evil that is christianity from Zoroastrianism when armenia was a roman vassal. When Shabour II reconquered armenian for Iran he encouraged the armenians to revert back to Zoroastrianism. Instead agitators like vartan mamikonian who had been brainwashed by roman christians agitated the armenians to revolt, and him and his followers were rightfully ahnilliated at the battle of Avariar. It wa sonly some 3 centuries later that christianity became widespread among the armenians after the Muslims conquered Iran. Had the armenians never adopted christianity their suffering never would have occurred, furthermore it set them up for their problems which began in the 19th century.
They began during the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and it was with him and his armenian mother that these problems began. Throughout history the Ottoman Sultans had fathered heirs with women from countries and peoples they were at war with, be it Serbians, Italians, French, Russians, etc. However all were raised as good Ottomans. Abdul Hamid II’s mother had him baptized as an armenian christian with the name bedros, making him a freak before the House of Osman and scarring him for life. Even worse Abdul Hamid II, aka bedros, grew up during a time when England, france, Austria, and Russia were using the pretence of protecting Christians to invade Ottoman territory, a practice which continued once he became Sultan in 1876. He had to make a decision, and his decision was based on the treatment he received once he became bedros. What else could he do? The armenians were collaborating with the Russians, as so many had entered Russian service, even obtaining prominent positions in the Russian government, and threatening Turkish society as well. They collaborated with the French and british as well, the very foreign powers who were seizing Ottoman lands and threatening the lives of Turks and all Ottoman subjects. There was only one solution, get rid of the armenians, kill them, seize their property, do everything to make them so miserable they would soon not be around. And what did the armenians do? Sure they attempted resistance at first, but then once they realized it was hopeless it ceased and they died, fled, and began spreading myths about why they were persecuted.
If they thought this would stop when Abdul Hamid II was deposed in 1909 they were wrong. Here the armenians blame everything on Talaat Pasha, Enver Pasha, and Jemal Pasha, not realizing those three were merely disciples of the deposed bedros. It was Talaat Pasha who would legislate against the armenians, hoping to outdo the Sultan, the other two, along with the rest of the Ottoman government, simply went along, as it was the law to go after those subversive enemies of the state the armenians. Then came the war. Once Germany entered on the side of Austria-Hungary to defend it against Russia the Ottomans were sought as allies by both Germany and the allies of Russia. It was the seizure of Turkish goods by the allies of Russia that brought the Ottomans on the side of Germany and against the very powers the armenians had been collaborating with. Then came 1915 and the attempt by the british and French to force open the straits by occupying them from the Ottomans. People forget that on April 24, 1915 the Ottomans had been informed that the british and French were invading, something had to be done, and that meant going after the enemies of the Ottomans at the straits and elsewhere, including the armenians. This meant only one thing, kill them wherever they were, after all because of their collaboration they were the enemy. Had they never collaborated with the british and French during the reign of bedros none of their sufferings would have occurred.
What of them afterwards. Those who survived, instead of facing the facts about what had happened, began to create myths, claiming they were the victims when in fact their sufferings were as much their own fault. After all, the Kurds and Greeks had the same problems from the Ottomans yet they did not make the same complaints. Despite the fact that Germany and it’s allies, including the nations created out of the Habsburg empire, had been allied with the Ottomans many armenians fled to those very countries. In fact, when nazi Germany invaded Russia many armenians fought on the side of the nazis, including some who had briefly established an armenian republic around Yerevan, as they saw the nazis as liberators. It was also the nazis who provided the armenians with fodder for their own myths in the form of the jewish holocaust. Like the armenians the jews were persecuted by their own kind inside Germany, and to shame others into giving them what they wanted by claiming they were the victims, and also becoming like social vermin wherever they went. Like the jews they also use coercive education about their genocide to create awareness, presenting the facts so that when one expresses any sympathy it is often made out of coercion, especially as they exhibit the history of their genocide in the same way Norman Finkelstein has complained about how his own people misrepresent their holocaust.
Today it is what the armenians have done differently from the jews and other groups like the jews that stands out. While the jews have welcomed Germans who speak of reconciliation because of the holocaust, the armenians have used the events of 1915 to demonize people of Turkish ancestry in their past, the only ethnic group in history which makes hating another group of people part of their culture, even Turks like Orhan Pamuk have not been welcome by the armenians the way Benedict XVI and Gerhard Schroder has been by the jews. Not to mention those armenians presented as prominent only pollute their professions and societies, like dr kevorkian who kills patients, vartan gregorian who pisses cash into do nothing artistic and educational institutions, the kardashian jendeh who encourage dissolute lifestyles, kirk kerkorian who makes shark business deals, etc.
When one is looking at a person or group of people who claim to be the victims of a catastrophic occurrence one must consider if anything was done to precipitate that occurrence. In the case of the armenians the more one looks at their history the more one sees they have done everything to bring their problems on themselves, and one begins to feel like I have recently, the only bad thing about the armenian genocide was that people like that great-grandfather of mine who participated in it did not finish the job.
One thing the armenians throw around is that they are persecuted because they are christian. Peope who know history know that the romans forced the armenians to convert to the evil that is christianity from Zoroastrianism when armenia was a roman vassal. When Shabour II reconquered armenian for Iran he encouraged the armenians to revert back to Zoroastrianism. Instead agitators like vartan mamikonian who had been brainwashed by roman christians agitated the armenians to revolt, and him and his followers were rightfully ahnilliated at the battle of Avariar. It wa sonly some 3 centuries later that christianity became widespread among the armenians after the Muslims conquered Iran. Had the armenians never adopted christianity their suffering never would have occurred, furthermore it set them up for their problems which began in the 19th century.
They began during the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and it was with him and his armenian mother that these problems began. Throughout history the Ottoman Sultans had fathered heirs with women from countries and peoples they were at war with, be it Serbians, Italians, French, Russians, etc. However all were raised as good Ottomans. Abdul Hamid II’s mother had him baptized as an armenian christian with the name bedros, making him a freak before the House of Osman and scarring him for life. Even worse Abdul Hamid II, aka bedros, grew up during a time when England, france, Austria, and Russia were using the pretence of protecting Christians to invade Ottoman territory, a practice which continued once he became Sultan in 1876. He had to make a decision, and his decision was based on the treatment he received once he became bedros. What else could he do? The armenians were collaborating with the Russians, as so many had entered Russian service, even obtaining prominent positions in the Russian government, and threatening Turkish society as well. They collaborated with the French and british as well, the very foreign powers who were seizing Ottoman lands and threatening the lives of Turks and all Ottoman subjects. There was only one solution, get rid of the armenians, kill them, seize their property, do everything to make them so miserable they would soon not be around. And what did the armenians do? Sure they attempted resistance at first, but then once they realized it was hopeless it ceased and they died, fled, and began spreading myths about why they were persecuted.
If they thought this would stop when Abdul Hamid II was deposed in 1909 they were wrong. Here the armenians blame everything on Talaat Pasha, Enver Pasha, and Jemal Pasha, not realizing those three were merely disciples of the deposed bedros. It was Talaat Pasha who would legislate against the armenians, hoping to outdo the Sultan, the other two, along with the rest of the Ottoman government, simply went along, as it was the law to go after those subversive enemies of the state the armenians. Then came the war. Once Germany entered on the side of Austria-Hungary to defend it against Russia the Ottomans were sought as allies by both Germany and the allies of Russia. It was the seizure of Turkish goods by the allies of Russia that brought the Ottomans on the side of Germany and against the very powers the armenians had been collaborating with. Then came 1915 and the attempt by the british and French to force open the straits by occupying them from the Ottomans. People forget that on April 24, 1915 the Ottomans had been informed that the british and French were invading, something had to be done, and that meant going after the enemies of the Ottomans at the straits and elsewhere, including the armenians. This meant only one thing, kill them wherever they were, after all because of their collaboration they were the enemy. Had they never collaborated with the british and French during the reign of bedros none of their sufferings would have occurred.
What of them afterwards. Those who survived, instead of facing the facts about what had happened, began to create myths, claiming they were the victims when in fact their sufferings were as much their own fault. After all, the Kurds and Greeks had the same problems from the Ottomans yet they did not make the same complaints. Despite the fact that Germany and it’s allies, including the nations created out of the Habsburg empire, had been allied with the Ottomans many armenians fled to those very countries. In fact, when nazi Germany invaded Russia many armenians fought on the side of the nazis, including some who had briefly established an armenian republic around Yerevan, as they saw the nazis as liberators. It was also the nazis who provided the armenians with fodder for their own myths in the form of the jewish holocaust. Like the armenians the jews were persecuted by their own kind inside Germany, and to shame others into giving them what they wanted by claiming they were the victims, and also becoming like social vermin wherever they went. Like the jews they also use coercive education about their genocide to create awareness, presenting the facts so that when one expresses any sympathy it is often made out of coercion, especially as they exhibit the history of their genocide in the same way Norman Finkelstein has complained about how his own people misrepresent their holocaust.
Today it is what the armenians have done differently from the jews and other groups like the jews that stands out. While the jews have welcomed Germans who speak of reconciliation because of the holocaust, the armenians have used the events of 1915 to demonize people of Turkish ancestry in their past, the only ethnic group in history which makes hating another group of people part of their culture, even Turks like Orhan Pamuk have not been welcome by the armenians the way Benedict XVI and Gerhard Schroder has been by the jews. Not to mention those armenians presented as prominent only pollute their professions and societies, like dr kevorkian who kills patients, vartan gregorian who pisses cash into do nothing artistic and educational institutions, the kardashian jendeh who encourage dissolute lifestyles, kirk kerkorian who makes shark business deals, etc.
When one is looking at a person or group of people who claim to be the victims of a catastrophic occurrence one must consider if anything was done to precipitate that occurrence. In the case of the armenians the more one looks at their history the more one sees they have done everything to bring their problems on themselves, and one begins to feel like I have recently, the only bad thing about the armenian genocide was that people like that great-grandfather of mine who participated in it did not finish the job.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Princess Leila, facts about her being maligned by wikipedia
Recently wikipedia, like the rest of wikimedia, has chosen to defame the memory of Princess Leila by rigging it’s website to put up false information about her life and to harass those who mention the truth. Here I am clarifying the points where wikipedia is wrong and putting the facts.
False wiki fact 1; Princess Leila graduated from brown university in 1992.
TRUTH; Princess Leila never graduated from brown, dropping out in 1991, according to many people who knew her as a student she was hazed out by harassment from other faculty and students. All students at brown are listed by their graduation year regardless of whether or not they graduated from brown.
False wiki fact 2; Princess Leila suffered from depression.
TRUTH; No credible clinical diagnosis was ever made of Princess Leila as to whether or not she suffered from depression or any other mental illness.
False wiki fact 3; Princess Leila was found with a lethal dose of quinalbarbitone and a non lethal dose of cocaine in her body on June 10, 2001 according to the coroner’s report on her death.
TRUTH; There is no one credible version of the coroner’s report on her. The report is self-contradictory in stating the quinalbarbitone was lethal but not the cocaine. Furthermore, it is stated she had taken the drugs in Paris before flying to London, however if she had taken that dosage which was reported she never would have survived the flight. The version in the bbc was released on the bbc’s website years after death due to public pressure but no credible print version was found about Princess Leila’s death. Media reports conflict as to how she was found dead, some saying she was found with a phone cord wrapped around her neck. In her mother’s memoirs released in 2004 Farah clearly mentions she ordered the doctor to go into Leila’s hotel room despite Leila telling her mother she did not want to have any contact with her when she was in London.
False wiki fact 4; Princess Leila stole drugs to fuel a drug habit according to the telegraph.
TRUTH; No law enforcement complaint was ever filed against Princess Leila during her lifetime.
It should be further noted that when viewing the history of those who made the changes putting the false information many of those who put that false info are listed as being jewish. I should not have to go into detail how since the creation of the zionist state of israel how the jewish community has maligned facts about Iranian history and people.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
False wiki fact 1; Princess Leila graduated from brown university in 1992.
TRUTH; Princess Leila never graduated from brown, dropping out in 1991, according to many people who knew her as a student she was hazed out by harassment from other faculty and students. All students at brown are listed by their graduation year regardless of whether or not they graduated from brown.
False wiki fact 2; Princess Leila suffered from depression.
TRUTH; No credible clinical diagnosis was ever made of Princess Leila as to whether or not she suffered from depression or any other mental illness.
False wiki fact 3; Princess Leila was found with a lethal dose of quinalbarbitone and a non lethal dose of cocaine in her body on June 10, 2001 according to the coroner’s report on her death.
TRUTH; There is no one credible version of the coroner’s report on her. The report is self-contradictory in stating the quinalbarbitone was lethal but not the cocaine. Furthermore, it is stated she had taken the drugs in Paris before flying to London, however if she had taken that dosage which was reported she never would have survived the flight. The version in the bbc was released on the bbc’s website years after death due to public pressure but no credible print version was found about Princess Leila’s death. Media reports conflict as to how she was found dead, some saying she was found with a phone cord wrapped around her neck. In her mother’s memoirs released in 2004 Farah clearly mentions she ordered the doctor to go into Leila’s hotel room despite Leila telling her mother she did not want to have any contact with her when she was in London.
False wiki fact 4; Princess Leila stole drugs to fuel a drug habit according to the telegraph.
TRUTH; No law enforcement complaint was ever filed against Princess Leila during her lifetime.
It should be further noted that when viewing the history of those who made the changes putting the false information many of those who put that false info are listed as being jewish. I should not have to go into detail how since the creation of the zionist state of israel how the jewish community has maligned facts about Iranian history and people.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
Monday, March 22, 2010
Zendran case, Major life altering update
Recently I have learned that the lawyer who helped embezzle my fortune in the 1990's, f thomas lenihan has died, and the news was broken to me in a very unusual way.
On March 17, 2010 I was walking past his law office on my way to the train station around 5:40 PM when I noticed on his nameboard the dates 1939-2003 underneath his name, which had not been there when I walked by 3 1/2 hours earlier nor had they been up there at any point between that point in time and 2003. Thinking it was a St. Patricks day joke I checked with the RI Bar Association to find out if this was true. Upon checking I found he was not listed among RI lawyers and that he was dead, and this was confirmed by an article in the Westerly Sun here
http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/article_875d29f2-e8c2-11de-becf-001cc4c002e0.html
Apparently his family and law firm had been keeping his name on the law firm and kept the impression he was alive. This false belief was perpetuated by the fact he is listed in West Legal directory
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/2628420_1?channel=LP
and on Attorneys listed
http://www.attorneyslisted.com/update/Westerly/Rhode%20Island/F%20Thomas%20Lenihan.aspx
This comes at a time when the Courts have been contacting his firm on my behalf telling him to make all records on me available or they will subopena him and the records, after evidence of foul play has been revealed.
This is a major win for me, for even though I have not gained any money tommy lenihan is no longer in a position to do to me and others harm through the legal system. This man was and is one of the most hated men and lawyers in Westerly, RI, and the country who had done hundreds of people wrong. Now he and his firm are beginning to get theirs.
Peter Z
On March 17, 2010 I was walking past his law office on my way to the train station around 5:40 PM when I noticed on his nameboard the dates 1939-2003 underneath his name, which had not been there when I walked by 3 1/2 hours earlier nor had they been up there at any point between that point in time and 2003. Thinking it was a St. Patricks day joke I checked with the RI Bar Association to find out if this was true. Upon checking I found he was not listed among RI lawyers and that he was dead, and this was confirmed by an article in the Westerly Sun here
http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/article_875d29f2-e8c2-11de-becf-001cc4c002e0.html
Apparently his family and law firm had been keeping his name on the law firm and kept the impression he was alive. This false belief was perpetuated by the fact he is listed in West Legal directory
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/2628420_1?channel=LP
and on Attorneys listed
http://www.attorneyslisted.com/update/Westerly/Rhode%20Island/F%20Thomas%20Lenihan.aspx
This comes at a time when the Courts have been contacting his firm on my behalf telling him to make all records on me available or they will subopena him and the records, after evidence of foul play has been revealed.
This is a major win for me, for even though I have not gained any money tommy lenihan is no longer in a position to do to me and others harm through the legal system. This man was and is one of the most hated men and lawyers in Westerly, RI, and the country who had done hundreds of people wrong. Now he and his firm are beginning to get theirs.
Peter Z
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
No Ruz oddness at brown
Last night I attended a naqqal performance of Bijan e Manizeh at brown, put on by professor iraj anvar, being invited there by the Iranian association of boston. Only a few people from boston were there, just a few people there I recognized out of a crowd of 30 odd people. The inglissi translation was not very precise and the Farsi performance was a newer edition. , and when I asked iraj about that he just got an attitude.
Worst of all was when leaving I noticed one of the brown pigs had parked his car at the watson istitute, which is next door. A few minutes later once I was on the trolley that same pig was driving around the block. And this after the providence police assured me that the brown pigs would leave me alone as I was invited legitimately.
As it turns out I am not the only one openly complaining about the brown pigs. Recently Episcopal Charities has been complaining about how the brown pigs have been harassing poor people going to the meal site at st. stephens, which is on george st but has brown buildings around it. When confronted by EC brown has suggested that they bus people to and from the meal site. Needless to say EC and many people are now NOT happy with brown.
Peter Z
Worst of all was when leaving I noticed one of the brown pigs had parked his car at the watson istitute, which is next door. A few minutes later once I was on the trolley that same pig was driving around the block. And this after the providence police assured me that the brown pigs would leave me alone as I was invited legitimately.
As it turns out I am not the only one openly complaining about the brown pigs. Recently Episcopal Charities has been complaining about how the brown pigs have been harassing poor people going to the meal site at st. stephens, which is on george st but has brown buildings around it. When confronted by EC brown has suggested that they bus people to and from the meal site. Needless to say EC and many people are now NOT happy with brown.
Peter Z
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
More watson/shit u oddness going around.
Recently more oddness has been going on around watson/shit u, and not just their pigs staring at me giving everyone there the finger whenever I go by.
1. Recently greg chafee, linc chafee's brother and wacri president, has begun listing wacri events on the watson institute's website. Only thing is those events are NOT open to the public, rather they are restricted to elitsists. My membership with wacri was terminated after I flashbacked when put in the room with brown administration who caused the legal problems I had and the hope club complained, however those of my contacts there who knew my situation refunded my memberhsip. This also creates a conflict as linc chafee went out of his brown contract early, so something is up. Contact greg at gregchafeewacri@gmail.com or call (401) 228-8657 to find out more about these elitists.
2. Recently salman rushdie returned to brown, this time they dropped the pig squad, why is anyone's guess as they've been all over campus at places where there are no problems.
3. Reently the Midle East studies dpt has been packed with zionists including omer bartov, martha joukowsky, nina tannenwald by that tramp cammett a far cry when I was there, and are focusing on irrelevant topics. Mosst concerning is bartov, whose "research" nas taken him into areas where my family has been and thus put him in a position to snoop on myself.
4. Recently lucnida waston has become involved with sarah lawrence college. The family that created sarah lawrence college are part owners with me at kensico cemetary, I wonder if lucinda or the fucks at watson/brown are aware of it?
Peter Z
1. Recently greg chafee, linc chafee's brother and wacri president, has begun listing wacri events on the watson institute's website. Only thing is those events are NOT open to the public, rather they are restricted to elitsists. My membership with wacri was terminated after I flashbacked when put in the room with brown administration who caused the legal problems I had and the hope club complained, however those of my contacts there who knew my situation refunded my memberhsip. This also creates a conflict as linc chafee went out of his brown contract early, so something is up. Contact greg at gregchafeewacri@gmail.com or call (401) 228-8657 to find out more about these elitists.
2. Recently salman rushdie returned to brown, this time they dropped the pig squad, why is anyone's guess as they've been all over campus at places where there are no problems.
3. Reently the Midle East studies dpt has been packed with zionists including omer bartov, martha joukowsky, nina tannenwald by that tramp cammett a far cry when I was there, and are focusing on irrelevant topics. Mosst concerning is bartov, whose "research" nas taken him into areas where my family has been and thus put him in a position to snoop on myself.
4. Recently lucnida waston has become involved with sarah lawrence college. The family that created sarah lawrence college are part owners with me at kensico cemetary, I wonder if lucinda or the fucks at watson/brown are aware of it?
Peter Z
Monday, February 15, 2010
These mousavi's are more dangerous
With all the attention being focused on mir hussein mousavi's cia ties
most people are ignoring 2 of his cousins who serve in Iran's militaty.
One is Commander of Army's 4th naval zone Seyed Mahmoud Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8805101306
The other is Iranian Army Lieutenant Commander, General Abdolrahim
Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8809081568
Notice both these individuals occupy key positions in Iran's military
and are related to mir hussein mousavi. Should an invasion occur these
individuals probably might switch sides and frag Iranian forces.
Remember, the defection of baath members at the start of the Iraqi
invasin did more damage to Saddam Hussein than any amrikan attacks.
Peter Khan Zendran
most people are ignoring 2 of his cousins who serve in Iran's militaty.
One is Commander of Army's 4th naval zone Seyed Mahmoud Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8805101306
The other is Iranian Army Lieutenant Commander, General Abdolrahim
Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8809081568
Notice both these individuals occupy key positions in Iran's military
and are related to mir hussein mousavi. Should an invasion occur these
individuals probably might switch sides and frag Iranian forces.
Remember, the defection of baath members at the start of the Iraqi
invasin did more damage to Saddam Hussein than any amrikan attacks.
Peter Khan Zendran
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
Iran targeted for american missle attack
Notice this comes at a time when the amrikan backed "green movement" has
been cracked down on and at a time when amrikan and zionist plans to
attack Iran over it's military buildup and nuclear program are being
kicked around. People forget Iran's nuclear program is to benefit Iran
and iran's military buildup is defensive, unlike amrika which has no
business in the gulf.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8811131832
2010-02-02 - 18:13
MP Decries Reinforcement of US Military Buildup in Region
TEHRAN (FNA)- A senior Iranian lawmaker on Tuesday strongly criticized
the United States' new military move in the Persian Gulf, warning that
the measure would endanger peace and security in the region.
"The US move to set up a new military base in the region runs counter to
the path of regional and international stability, peace and security,"
Rapporteur of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy
Commission Kazzem Jalali told FNA, cautioning that the measure is not
mere manifestation of a political stance.
He pointed out that Washington is seeking a strong and direct military
presence in the region after its different scenarios for the Middle-East
failed.
Reminding that the US move would serve the interests of those countries
producing new and modern weapons, Jalali said, "The US measure will
cause discord and differences in the region, which would serve their
interests."
Jalali further underlined that the US move is also aimed at inspiring
the regional states with a feeling of Iranophobia to divert attentions
from the threat of the foreign forces' military presence in the region.
"The regional states should realize that peace and stability in the
region can be materialized through establishment of a new and modern
collective security system in the region," Jalali concluded.
Jalai's remarks came two days after US officials said on Sunday that the
United States has expanded land- and sea-based missile defense systems
in and around the Persian Gulf to counter what it sees as Iran's growing
missile threat.
Four Mideast countries to have the US system are Kuwait, the United Arab
Emirates, Bahrain - which also hosts the US Navy's 5th Fleet
headquarters - and Qatar, which has a modernized US air operations
center that played a key role in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
General David Petraeus, the US Central Command chief responsible for US
military operations across the Middle East, said the US now has eight
Patriot missile batteries stationed in the Persian Gulf region - two
each in four countries.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
been cracked down on and at a time when amrikan and zionist plans to
attack Iran over it's military buildup and nuclear program are being
kicked around. People forget Iran's nuclear program is to benefit Iran
and iran's military buildup is defensive, unlike amrika which has no
business in the gulf.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8811131832
2010-02-02 - 18:13
MP Decries Reinforcement of US Military Buildup in Region
TEHRAN (FNA)- A senior Iranian lawmaker on Tuesday strongly criticized
the United States' new military move in the Persian Gulf, warning that
the measure would endanger peace and security in the region.
"The US move to set up a new military base in the region runs counter to
the path of regional and international stability, peace and security,"
Rapporteur of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy
Commission Kazzem Jalali told FNA, cautioning that the measure is not
mere manifestation of a political stance.
He pointed out that Washington is seeking a strong and direct military
presence in the region after its different scenarios for the Middle-East
failed.
Reminding that the US move would serve the interests of those countries
producing new and modern weapons, Jalali said, "The US measure will
cause discord and differences in the region, which would serve their
interests."
Jalali further underlined that the US move is also aimed at inspiring
the regional states with a feeling of Iranophobia to divert attentions
from the threat of the foreign forces' military presence in the region.
"The regional states should realize that peace and stability in the
region can be materialized through establishment of a new and modern
collective security system in the region," Jalali concluded.
Jalai's remarks came two days after US officials said on Sunday that the
United States has expanded land- and sea-based missile defense systems
in and around the Persian Gulf to counter what it sees as Iran's growing
missile threat.
Four Mideast countries to have the US system are Kuwait, the United Arab
Emirates, Bahrain - which also hosts the US Navy's 5th Fleet
headquarters - and Qatar, which has a modernized US air operations
center that played a key role in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
General David Petraeus, the US Central Command chief responsible for US
military operations across the Middle East, said the US now has eight
Patriot missile batteries stationed in the Persian Gulf region - two
each in four countries.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Iran menaced by zionist attack as amrika openly backs rioters in Iran
If anyone needs more proof that the "green movement" is really to
destabilize Iran in preperation for an invasion read this. People
forget that the zionists running isreal are diehard warhawks who would
jump at any chance to attack Iran, and Mottaki and many inside Iran
realize this. Notice this is coming out as proof is coming out of
american backing of the green movement. The more this proof comes out
the more people see that clinton, holbrooke, gates, emmanuel, and others
are bigger niggers than the president.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8810231478
2010-01-13 - 17:56
Mottaki Downplays Israeli Attack on Iran
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Wednesday
rejected the speculations that the US and Israel might launch an attack
against the country, stressing that the Zionist regime does not dare to
attack Iran.
We believe that the Zionist regime is not experiencing proper conditions
to dare to attack Iran, Mottaki told reporters in a joint press
conference with his Omani counterpart Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdallah here
in Tehran today.
The Iranian top diplomat also described the possibility of a military
attack against Iran's nuclear installations as media propaganda by the
Zionists and Americans which was heated during the presidency of George
W. Bush.
"Since its illegal establishment in the region, Israel has brought the
Muslim people of the region nothing but problem, annoyance, aggression,
terror and massacre," he added.
"Israel is a useless member which has been imposed on the region,"
Mottaki said, reminding that due to the aggressive nature of the Israeli
regime, it should always be watched and monitored.
Speculations that Israel could bomb Iran mounted after a big Israeli air
drill in 2008. In the first week of June 2008, 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15
fighters reportedly took part in an exercise over the eastern
Mediterranean and Greece, which was interpreted as a dress rehearsal for
a possible attack on Iran's nuclear installations.
Israel and its close ally the United States accuse Iran of seeking a
nuclear weapon, while they have never presented any corroborative
document to substantiate their allegations. Both Washington and Tel Aviv
possess advanced weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear
warheads.
Iran vehemently denies the charges, insisting that its nuclear program
is for peaceful purposes only. Tehran stresses that the country has
always pursued a civilian path to provide power to the growing number of
Iranian population, whose fossil fuel would eventually run dry.
Iran has warned that it would target Israel and its worldwide interests
in case it comes under attack by the Tel Aviv.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
MIDDLE EAST NEWS
JANUARY 9, 2010.U.S. Shifts Iran Focus to Support Opposition
.ArticleComments (145)more in World ».
EmailPrintSave This ↓ More.
.facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
+ More close Yahoo! BuzzMySpacedel.icio.usRedditLinkedInFarkViadeoOrkut
Text .
By JAY SOLOMON
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is increasingly questioning the
long-term stability of Tehran's government and moving to find ways to
support Iran's opposition "Green Movement," said senior U.S. officials.
The White House is crafting new financial sanctions specifically
designed to punish the Iranian entities and individuals most directly
involved in the crackdown on Iran's dissident forces, said the U.S.
officials, rather than just those involved in Iran's nuclear program.
View Full Image
Sipa Press The U.S. is seeking ways to help Iran's opposition, led by
figures such as Mahdi Karroubi (pictured).
.
U.S. Treasury Department strategists already have been focusing on
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has emerged as the economic and
military power behind Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
In recent weeks, senior Green Movement figures -- who have been speaking
at major Washington think tanks -- have made up a list of IRGC-related
companies they suggest targeting, which has been forwarded to the Obama
administration by third parties.
Names on the list include Iran's largest telecommunications provider,
Telecommunication Company of Iran, which is majority-owned by the IRGC,
and the Iranian Aluminum Co. A U.S. official involved in Iran said the
administration wouldn't comment on whether it was acting on the
information.
American diplomats, meanwhile, have begun drawing comparisons in public
between Iran's current political turmoil and the events that led up to
the 1979 overthrow of Shah Reza Pahlavi.
"In my opinion there are many similarities," the State Department's
chief Iran specialist, John Limbert, told Iran-based listeners this week
over U.S. government-run Radio Farda. "I think it's very hard for the
government to decide how to react to the legitimate and lawful demands
of the people."
Since the opposition movement's demonstrations recently peaked after the
death of reformist Islamic cleric Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, a
number of Iran scholars in the U.S. said they have been contacted by
senior administration officials eager to understand if the Iranian
unrest suggested a greater threat to Tehran's government than originally
understood.
View Full Image
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images President Ahmadinejad
.
"The tone has changed in the conversation," said one scholar who
discussed Iran with senior U.S. officials. "There's realization now that
this unrest really matters."
In a signal of the White House's increased attention to Iran's political
upheaval, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered over coffee at the
State Department this week with four leading Iran scholars and mapped
out the current dynamics, said U.S. officials. One issue explored was
how the U.S. should respond if Tehran suddenly expressed a desire to
reach a compromise on the nuclear issue. Mrs. Clinton asked whether the
U.S. could reach a pact without crippling the prospects for the Green
Movement.
U.S. allies are mixed in their response to the new focus. One senior
Arab official said he told State Department officials this week they
were deluded if they though Iran was close to experiencing a revolution
reminiscent of the Shah's overthrow. "The IRGC has its hands on the
Iranian people," the official said.
Israel, which faces the greatest security threat from Iran, says only
widespread sanctions will effectively upend Tehran's current political
leadership. "Many Israeli experts have concluded that expansive
sanctions will widen the schisms between the Iranian government and its
people," said Israel's ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren.
Senior U.S. officials stressed in interviews this week that President
Barack Obama isn't moving toward seeking a regime change as its policy
for Iran. Rather, these officials said, Washington remains committed to
a dual-track approach of pursuing dialogue aimed at ending Iran's
nuclear program while applying increasing financial pressure if the
talks fail.
Both the Obama administration and the Iranian dissidents have been wary
of any direct contacts, due to fears such meetings could provide
ammunition for Tehran. The regime and its supporters continue to put
harsh pressure on the Green Movement; on Friday, progovernment
demonstrators shot at a car carrying a leading opposition figure, Mahdi
Karroubi. He escaped without harm, his Web site reported later.
Still, the White House's re-evaluation of the Green Movement marks a
significant evolution of Mr. Obama's Iran policy since demonstrators
began openly challenging President Ahmadinejad's re-election in June,
said diplomats and analysts.
"The Green Movement has demonstrated more staying power than perhaps
some have anticipated," said a senior U.S. official. "The regime is
internally losing its legitimacy, which is of its own doing."
The White House initially displayed caution in lending any vocal support
to Iranian protesters, as many U.S. and European officials believed
Tehran's security forces would quickly suppress any wide-scale dissent.
U.S. officials repeatedly stressed over the summer that the U.S. was
prioritizing efforts to negotiate with Iran on its nuclear program over
any rapid push for democratic change.
The U.S. response was so timid that some Iranian protesters openly
challenged Mr. Obama. "Obama, Obama -- either with us, or with them!"
Tehran demonstrators were recorded chanting in November.
U.S. officials say that the White House's policy has shifted, in part,
due to the surprising resilience of the Green Movement in the face of
the pervasive crackdown.
The Obama administration has increasingly voiced support for human
rights in Iran as the demonstrations have continued. Mr. Obama used his
Nobel Prize acceptance speech last month to forcefully call for the
respect of human rights and civil liberties.
U.S. officials cite the White House's public mourning of Mr. Montazeri's
death as perhaps the pivotal step in trying to forge common cause with
the opposition.
"Do we expect the current government to be overthrown? I wouldn't say
that at the current time," said a senior State Department official. "But
a crack can certainly grow over time."
Write to Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A7
Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution
and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by
copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please
contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com
More In World
EmailPrinter FriendlyOrder ReprintsShare: facebook
destabilize Iran in preperation for an invasion read this. People
forget that the zionists running isreal are diehard warhawks who would
jump at any chance to attack Iran, and Mottaki and many inside Iran
realize this. Notice this is coming out as proof is coming out of
american backing of the green movement. The more this proof comes out
the more people see that clinton, holbrooke, gates, emmanuel, and others
are bigger niggers than the president.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8810231478
2010-01-13 - 17:56
Mottaki Downplays Israeli Attack on Iran
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Wednesday
rejected the speculations that the US and Israel might launch an attack
against the country, stressing that the Zionist regime does not dare to
attack Iran.
We believe that the Zionist regime is not experiencing proper conditions
to dare to attack Iran, Mottaki told reporters in a joint press
conference with his Omani counterpart Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdallah here
in Tehran today.
The Iranian top diplomat also described the possibility of a military
attack against Iran's nuclear installations as media propaganda by the
Zionists and Americans which was heated during the presidency of George
W. Bush.
"Since its illegal establishment in the region, Israel has brought the
Muslim people of the region nothing but problem, annoyance, aggression,
terror and massacre," he added.
"Israel is a useless member which has been imposed on the region,"
Mottaki said, reminding that due to the aggressive nature of the Israeli
regime, it should always be watched and monitored.
Speculations that Israel could bomb Iran mounted after a big Israeli air
drill in 2008. In the first week of June 2008, 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15
fighters reportedly took part in an exercise over the eastern
Mediterranean and Greece, which was interpreted as a dress rehearsal for
a possible attack on Iran's nuclear installations.
Israel and its close ally the United States accuse Iran of seeking a
nuclear weapon, while they have never presented any corroborative
document to substantiate their allegations. Both Washington and Tel Aviv
possess advanced weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear
warheads.
Iran vehemently denies the charges, insisting that its nuclear program
is for peaceful purposes only. Tehran stresses that the country has
always pursued a civilian path to provide power to the growing number of
Iranian population, whose fossil fuel would eventually run dry.
Iran has warned that it would target Israel and its worldwide interests
in case it comes under attack by the Tel Aviv.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
MIDDLE EAST NEWS
JANUARY 9, 2010.U.S. Shifts Iran Focus to Support Opposition
.ArticleComments (145)more in World ».
EmailPrintSave This ↓ More.
Digg
StumbleUpon
+ More close Yahoo! BuzzMySpacedel.icio.usRedditLinkedInFarkViadeoOrkut
Text .
By JAY SOLOMON
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is increasingly questioning the
long-term stability of Tehran's government and moving to find ways to
support Iran's opposition "Green Movement," said senior U.S. officials.
The White House is crafting new financial sanctions specifically
designed to punish the Iranian entities and individuals most directly
involved in the crackdown on Iran's dissident forces, said the U.S.
officials, rather than just those involved in Iran's nuclear program.
View Full Image
Sipa Press The U.S. is seeking ways to help Iran's opposition, led by
figures such as Mahdi Karroubi (pictured).
.
U.S. Treasury Department strategists already have been focusing on
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has emerged as the economic and
military power behind Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
In recent weeks, senior Green Movement figures -- who have been speaking
at major Washington think tanks -- have made up a list of IRGC-related
companies they suggest targeting, which has been forwarded to the Obama
administration by third parties.
Names on the list include Iran's largest telecommunications provider,
Telecommunication Company of Iran, which is majority-owned by the IRGC,
and the Iranian Aluminum Co. A U.S. official involved in Iran said the
administration wouldn't comment on whether it was acting on the
information.
American diplomats, meanwhile, have begun drawing comparisons in public
between Iran's current political turmoil and the events that led up to
the 1979 overthrow of Shah Reza Pahlavi.
"In my opinion there are many similarities," the State Department's
chief Iran specialist, John Limbert, told Iran-based listeners this week
over U.S. government-run Radio Farda. "I think it's very hard for the
government to decide how to react to the legitimate and lawful demands
of the people."
Since the opposition movement's demonstrations recently peaked after the
death of reformist Islamic cleric Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, a
number of Iran scholars in the U.S. said they have been contacted by
senior administration officials eager to understand if the Iranian
unrest suggested a greater threat to Tehran's government than originally
understood.
View Full Image
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images President Ahmadinejad
.
"The tone has changed in the conversation," said one scholar who
discussed Iran with senior U.S. officials. "There's realization now that
this unrest really matters."
In a signal of the White House's increased attention to Iran's political
upheaval, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered over coffee at the
State Department this week with four leading Iran scholars and mapped
out the current dynamics, said U.S. officials. One issue explored was
how the U.S. should respond if Tehran suddenly expressed a desire to
reach a compromise on the nuclear issue. Mrs. Clinton asked whether the
U.S. could reach a pact without crippling the prospects for the Green
Movement.
U.S. allies are mixed in their response to the new focus. One senior
Arab official said he told State Department officials this week they
were deluded if they though Iran was close to experiencing a revolution
reminiscent of the Shah's overthrow. "The IRGC has its hands on the
Iranian people," the official said.
Israel, which faces the greatest security threat from Iran, says only
widespread sanctions will effectively upend Tehran's current political
leadership. "Many Israeli experts have concluded that expansive
sanctions will widen the schisms between the Iranian government and its
people," said Israel's ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren.
Senior U.S. officials stressed in interviews this week that President
Barack Obama isn't moving toward seeking a regime change as its policy
for Iran. Rather, these officials said, Washington remains committed to
a dual-track approach of pursuing dialogue aimed at ending Iran's
nuclear program while applying increasing financial pressure if the
talks fail.
Both the Obama administration and the Iranian dissidents have been wary
of any direct contacts, due to fears such meetings could provide
ammunition for Tehran. The regime and its supporters continue to put
harsh pressure on the Green Movement; on Friday, progovernment
demonstrators shot at a car carrying a leading opposition figure, Mahdi
Karroubi. He escaped without harm, his Web site reported later.
Still, the White House's re-evaluation of the Green Movement marks a
significant evolution of Mr. Obama's Iran policy since demonstrators
began openly challenging President Ahmadinejad's re-election in June,
said diplomats and analysts.
"The Green Movement has demonstrated more staying power than perhaps
some have anticipated," said a senior U.S. official. "The regime is
internally losing its legitimacy, which is of its own doing."
The White House initially displayed caution in lending any vocal support
to Iranian protesters, as many U.S. and European officials believed
Tehran's security forces would quickly suppress any wide-scale dissent.
U.S. officials repeatedly stressed over the summer that the U.S. was
prioritizing efforts to negotiate with Iran on its nuclear program over
any rapid push for democratic change.
The U.S. response was so timid that some Iranian protesters openly
challenged Mr. Obama. "Obama, Obama -- either with us, or with them!"
Tehran demonstrators were recorded chanting in November.
U.S. officials say that the White House's policy has shifted, in part,
due to the surprising resilience of the Green Movement in the face of
the pervasive crackdown.
The Obama administration has increasingly voiced support for human
rights in Iran as the demonstrations have continued. Mr. Obama used his
Nobel Prize acceptance speech last month to forcefully call for the
respect of human rights and civil liberties.
U.S. officials cite the White House's public mourning of Mr. Montazeri's
death as perhaps the pivotal step in trying to forge common cause with
the opposition.
"Do we expect the current government to be overthrown? I wouldn't say
that at the current time," said a senior State Department official. "But
a crack can certainly grow over time."
Write to Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A7
Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution
and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by
copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please
contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com
More In World
EmailPrinter FriendlyOrder ReprintsShare: facebook
Monday, January 04, 2010
News they're not reporting about Iran
Some of you have heard 2 stories about Iran reported in the news, what you are NOT hearing is the full truth behind them.
In the story about Iran trying to acquire yellowcake from Kazakhstan people forget the following. Not only is that story not true, Kazakhstan is in a position to sell whole nuclear weapons to Iran, so why would Iran seek yellowcake when it could buy whole nuclear weapons from Kazakhstan? One reason for this would be to give a provocation to send an international presence to Iran in the Caspian region, where Iran has Oil interests and where amrika and the cfr are trying to balkanize Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran which has been going on since the bush administration considered it. This leads into the second misreported story.
Some heard how rumors how mousavi and other so called oppostion leaders fled to those 2 caspian provinces when they did not. This has to do with the fact mentioned above that amrika/cfr are considering balkanizing Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran, along with other parts of Iran. Iran has also increased it's military presence in that region and has a cheyene mountain style facility in Mount Damavand, which was put thyere with assistance from mousavi's fellow cia/american backed collaboprator/provacetur mohammed forouzandeh. One reason to kick this around is to increase Iran's presence in that region to either draw vital forces away from more strategic locations or to provoke further conflict.
Speaking of mousavi notice how fars news is hiding stories about mousavi's cousin who is in Iranian Air Force.
Peter Khan Zendran
In the story about Iran trying to acquire yellowcake from Kazakhstan people forget the following. Not only is that story not true, Kazakhstan is in a position to sell whole nuclear weapons to Iran, so why would Iran seek yellowcake when it could buy whole nuclear weapons from Kazakhstan? One reason for this would be to give a provocation to send an international presence to Iran in the Caspian region, where Iran has Oil interests and where amrika and the cfr are trying to balkanize Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran which has been going on since the bush administration considered it. This leads into the second misreported story.
Some heard how rumors how mousavi and other so called oppostion leaders fled to those 2 caspian provinces when they did not. This has to do with the fact mentioned above that amrika/cfr are considering balkanizing Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran, along with other parts of Iran. Iran has also increased it's military presence in that region and has a cheyene mountain style facility in Mount Damavand, which was put thyere with assistance from mousavi's fellow cia/american backed collaboprator/provacetur mohammed forouzandeh. One reason to kick this around is to increase Iran's presence in that region to either draw vital forces away from more strategic locations or to provoke further conflict.
Speaking of mousavi notice how fars news is hiding stories about mousavi's cousin who is in Iranian Air Force.
Peter Khan Zendran
Bandar Abbas images maligned on google/wiki
As some of you may know google/wiki updated the images for Bandar Abbas
on December 17, showing images that were taken on June 29, 2009. Within
days the wikifreaks did their damage, which can be seen on the link
below.
http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=27.145961&lon=56.2132967&z=17&l=0&m=b
Among their mistakes they identify the Jamaran FFG which is in drydock
incorrectly as "Alvand class Frigate" and the 2 Ghadir class SSK's and 2
Yugo class SSK's are listed as "Unidentifiable Midget Subs" among the
more glaring mistakes. Most notable is the fact that they have deleted
the tags showing the 2 Ghadir class SSK's which are about be launched,
which care visible next to the drydock, as those tags are originals of
mine which I put up there.
Once again, wikimedia is showing usual bias and information
manipulation.
Peter Khan Zendran
on December 17, showing images that were taken on June 29, 2009. Within
days the wikifreaks did their damage, which can be seen on the link
below.
http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=27.145961&lon=56.2132967&z=17&l=0&m=b
Among their mistakes they identify the Jamaran FFG which is in drydock
incorrectly as "Alvand class Frigate" and the 2 Ghadir class SSK's and 2
Yugo class SSK's are listed as "Unidentifiable Midget Subs" among the
more glaring mistakes. Most notable is the fact that they have deleted
the tags showing the 2 Ghadir class SSK's which are about be launched,
which care visible next to the drydock, as those tags are originals of
mine which I put up there.
Once again, wikimedia is showing usual bias and information
manipulation.
Peter Khan Zendran
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Reviving the Pure Faith of Zarathustra
For too long those who follow the faith of Zarathustra have been maligned and misunderstood, to the point where both people who claim to practice the faith of Zarathustra and outsiders get confused as to what it means to be Zoroastrian and follow the teachings of Zarathustra. Yet despite the fact that many who claim to believe in Zarathustra have been polluted they forget that the faiths/religions of the World all have been influenced by Zarathustra. With two heretical spoofs of Zoroastrianism, Christianity and Islam, fighting it out and Iranians around the world suffering now is a perfect time to revive the pure faith of Zarathustra.
There are two ways to define what a Zoroastrian/Zarathustri is. The first is to define it by what is is, i.e. the faith of Zarathustra comprised of those who follow and believe in the teachings of Zarathustra. The second is to define it by what it is not. It is not a faith of Aryan/white supremacists which Nietzsche promogulated. It is not a magical cult as some fiction writers would have people believe.. It is not some namby-pamby hippie faith as many who have met with the parsis have assumed, or those who are obsessed with fagass freddie mercury, who had done much during his lifetime to malign his heritage, assume.
The parsis and freddie mercury are excellent places to start with when defining what Zorostrianism is not. In fagass freddie’s case if he were really a Zoroastrian he never would have engaged in homosexual intercourse, as it is strictly forbidden for all Zoroastrians. The parsis, the descendants of Zoroastrians who fled the Muslim invasion of Iran in the 7th century and who mostly settled in what is now India, have allowed the practices of Zarathustra to be corrupted. For instance, most of them practice veganism, which is alien to the teachings of Zarathustra and was adopted by contact with Hindus. The same is similarly true for the navjote ceremony, which was influenced by contact with Judaism and Hinduism. Though Zoroastrian teachings have influenced Judaism, such as kashrut dietary law which is based on Zoroastrian nasau dietary laws and the refusal to encourage converts, the jewish bar/bat mitzvah helped to form the navjote, whereas contact with hindus and their upanayana ceremony helped to cement the practice among parsis. As stated above a Zoroastrian is one who follows and believes in the teachings of Zarathustra. Throughout history as Iran expanded along with Iranian civilization and culture spread the teachings of Zarathustra travelled with it as well. Along with successes many failures and catastrophes occurred, diluting the Iranian community abroad and causing many to abandon the faith. As many have chose to return to the pure faith of Zarathustra such ceremonies are superfluous.
The texts of Zoroastrian faith, the Avesta, Yasna, Gathas, etc, while they are true documents, only now exist in written form because of the threat Christianity posed because of their use of the bible. Up to that point the teachings of Zaratustra were transmitted orally, with those lying killed. As Christians used this against Zoroastrians, claiming their faith was false because it was orally transmitted, the teachings of Zarathustra were written down in the third century by a Zoroastrian ratu named Tansar. Here I use the title ratu instead of mobed, for the title mobed came about in the third century when Tansar helped establish Zoroastrianism’s power base as the state religion of Iran when Ardashir came to power as Shahanshah in 224. Up until that point Zoroastrianism never had any hierarchy, simply was a community of believers of the faith with no hierarchical structure, and the title mobed was based on the priests of Judaism. Therefore anyone who claims to be a mobed is not a proper Zoroastrian. Just as controversial is the method of prayer.. While Zoroastrians must pray five times a day in front of fire many can’t decide whether to do the Kusti prayers or to recite Ahunavar, the greatest prayer and act of devotion. As the Ahunavar is the greatest prayer reciting it five times daily before fire is proper. The kusti, while taught by Zarathustra, is superfluous, as there are times when one does not have access to a kusti.
Many ask can Zoroastrianism be revived today, and I say yes. The biggest impediment is the laziness of people to take a hard look at the teachings of Zarathustra and to apply them to their lives, thus becoming a proper Zoroastrian. Consider how both Christianity and islam copy off of Zoroastrianism. In the case of Christianity they mention in the Gospel how the three “wise men”, who were Zoroastrian ratu visited jesus at his birth, as they predicted he would be born, calling him Ushedar, the first world savior who would be born 1,000 years after the birth of Zarathustra and who would fail in his work. The teaching of the unforgivable sin of denying one the right to pray mentioned in the Gospel is Zoroastrian in origin, the Christian wedding vows are of Zoroastrian in origin, the catholic concept of purgatory comes from the Zoroastrian Hammigistan, the protestant belief in a community of believers is also Zoroastrian in practice. Yet mainstream Christianity continues to ignore and marginalize Zoroastrians. Islam copies off of Zoroastrianism most of all. The five daily prayers are Zoroastrian, the Halal dietary laws are Zoroastrian in origin, and the concept of Jihad is Zoroastrian in origin, just to name the most obvious. Even many Muslims have considered Zoroastrianism a sect of Islam, which though false has allowed Muslims to minister to Zoroastrians in prisons where often Zoroastrian worship is forbidden. Therefore Zoroastrian concepts are familiar, the only thing left is to apply them more vigorously to allow people to revert or convert.
Consider the benefits of the Zoroastrian way. For one if a mass reversion occurred in Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries once under Iranian rule the horrors of sharia law would disappear, such as cutting off hands for stealing a loaf of bread, or honor killings of unmarried couples having sexual relations or killings of people who use alcohol, as Zoroastrian teachings do not condone this, yet those who complain about sharia law do not even examine Zoroastrianism as an alternative or encourage reversion. The horrors of pedophile priests in Christianity, notable demonstrated in the catholic church but which have also occurred in Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist, and other sects, and other Christian and muslim abuses of clerical authority would never have occurred had there been mass reversion and had Zoroastrianism remained a force.
It would be very easy to put the teachings of Zarathustra into practice today and revive the Pure faith he taught. The real question is what are we willing to do to put it into use?
There are two ways to define what a Zoroastrian/Zarathustri is. The first is to define it by what is is, i.e. the faith of Zarathustra comprised of those who follow and believe in the teachings of Zarathustra. The second is to define it by what it is not. It is not a faith of Aryan/white supremacists which Nietzsche promogulated. It is not a magical cult as some fiction writers would have people believe.. It is not some namby-pamby hippie faith as many who have met with the parsis have assumed, or those who are obsessed with fagass freddie mercury, who had done much during his lifetime to malign his heritage, assume.
The parsis and freddie mercury are excellent places to start with when defining what Zorostrianism is not. In fagass freddie’s case if he were really a Zoroastrian he never would have engaged in homosexual intercourse, as it is strictly forbidden for all Zoroastrians. The parsis, the descendants of Zoroastrians who fled the Muslim invasion of Iran in the 7th century and who mostly settled in what is now India, have allowed the practices of Zarathustra to be corrupted. For instance, most of them practice veganism, which is alien to the teachings of Zarathustra and was adopted by contact with Hindus. The same is similarly true for the navjote ceremony, which was influenced by contact with Judaism and Hinduism. Though Zoroastrian teachings have influenced Judaism, such as kashrut dietary law which is based on Zoroastrian nasau dietary laws and the refusal to encourage converts, the jewish bar/bat mitzvah helped to form the navjote, whereas contact with hindus and their upanayana ceremony helped to cement the practice among parsis. As stated above a Zoroastrian is one who follows and believes in the teachings of Zarathustra. Throughout history as Iran expanded along with Iranian civilization and culture spread the teachings of Zarathustra travelled with it as well. Along with successes many failures and catastrophes occurred, diluting the Iranian community abroad and causing many to abandon the faith. As many have chose to return to the pure faith of Zarathustra such ceremonies are superfluous.
The texts of Zoroastrian faith, the Avesta, Yasna, Gathas, etc, while they are true documents, only now exist in written form because of the threat Christianity posed because of their use of the bible. Up to that point the teachings of Zaratustra were transmitted orally, with those lying killed. As Christians used this against Zoroastrians, claiming their faith was false because it was orally transmitted, the teachings of Zarathustra were written down in the third century by a Zoroastrian ratu named Tansar. Here I use the title ratu instead of mobed, for the title mobed came about in the third century when Tansar helped establish Zoroastrianism’s power base as the state religion of Iran when Ardashir came to power as Shahanshah in 224. Up until that point Zoroastrianism never had any hierarchy, simply was a community of believers of the faith with no hierarchical structure, and the title mobed was based on the priests of Judaism. Therefore anyone who claims to be a mobed is not a proper Zoroastrian. Just as controversial is the method of prayer.. While Zoroastrians must pray five times a day in front of fire many can’t decide whether to do the Kusti prayers or to recite Ahunavar, the greatest prayer and act of devotion. As the Ahunavar is the greatest prayer reciting it five times daily before fire is proper. The kusti, while taught by Zarathustra, is superfluous, as there are times when one does not have access to a kusti.
Many ask can Zoroastrianism be revived today, and I say yes. The biggest impediment is the laziness of people to take a hard look at the teachings of Zarathustra and to apply them to their lives, thus becoming a proper Zoroastrian. Consider how both Christianity and islam copy off of Zoroastrianism. In the case of Christianity they mention in the Gospel how the three “wise men”, who were Zoroastrian ratu visited jesus at his birth, as they predicted he would be born, calling him Ushedar, the first world savior who would be born 1,000 years after the birth of Zarathustra and who would fail in his work. The teaching of the unforgivable sin of denying one the right to pray mentioned in the Gospel is Zoroastrian in origin, the Christian wedding vows are of Zoroastrian in origin, the catholic concept of purgatory comes from the Zoroastrian Hammigistan, the protestant belief in a community of believers is also Zoroastrian in practice. Yet mainstream Christianity continues to ignore and marginalize Zoroastrians. Islam copies off of Zoroastrianism most of all. The five daily prayers are Zoroastrian, the Halal dietary laws are Zoroastrian in origin, and the concept of Jihad is Zoroastrian in origin, just to name the most obvious. Even many Muslims have considered Zoroastrianism a sect of Islam, which though false has allowed Muslims to minister to Zoroastrians in prisons where often Zoroastrian worship is forbidden. Therefore Zoroastrian concepts are familiar, the only thing left is to apply them more vigorously to allow people to revert or convert.
Consider the benefits of the Zoroastrian way. For one if a mass reversion occurred in Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries once under Iranian rule the horrors of sharia law would disappear, such as cutting off hands for stealing a loaf of bread, or honor killings of unmarried couples having sexual relations or killings of people who use alcohol, as Zoroastrian teachings do not condone this, yet those who complain about sharia law do not even examine Zoroastrianism as an alternative or encourage reversion. The horrors of pedophile priests in Christianity, notable demonstrated in the catholic church but which have also occurred in Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist, and other sects, and other Christian and muslim abuses of clerical authority would never have occurred had there been mass reversion and had Zoroastrianism remained a force.
It would be very easy to put the teachings of Zarathustra into practice today and revive the Pure faith he taught. The real question is what are we willing to do to put it into use?
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Seeing the facts about Iran’s recent problems
Those who are able to see straight are able to see that the recent troubles Iran has experienced since June 2009 are not those of a freedom or human rights movement, rather one that’s aim is to destabilize Iran in preparation for an invasion, and failing that weaken Iran where it can not play a major role in World affairs. There are some that think that when people say this they are crazy, however those people are stupid and uninformed, and need to look at the facts harder. Here I will present the basics behind the facts.
Those that say that this is a human rights movement need to ask themselves some important questions. First, if human rights has been a long standing issue then why have there not been riots for years in Iran? If conditions are as bad as are claimed then Iran’s population would never have tolerated it for any length of time. Plus amnesty international and other groups which report on human rights have not always reported the truth about Iranian “atrocity” stories or Iranian affairs. They do not mention facts like how honor killings and other female abuse stories are confined only to Iran’s practicing muslim population, or how branches of groups like the Persian cultural foundation are nonexistent. Then again seeing how that amnesty international has recently been packed by Iranians who spew such lies it is not surprising, yet all the same it is disgusting and disgraceful. If you question my reasoning consider this. Many of these same Iranians have been long opponents of war with America and Israel, though many of them have avoided taking any direct action and instead relied on the actions of others. Second, most Iranian groups were shut down and harassed as political groups because they did not spew the negative image that many in gpvernment and positions of power in the west have of Iran and Iranians. Along comes these uprisings in Iran under the guise of the green movement and all of a sudden those who support the green movement do not face negative stigma, as if to personify hajji baba for the 21st century.
The argument that it is a freedom movement fails when one asks, like above, why there were no mass uprisings before the June 2009 elections? Furthermore consider the uprisings were backed and instigated by politicians inside and outside of Iran who have had connections with the cia and the council on foreign relations. People forget that mousavi was a long time crony of khomeini, and we need not go into detail about the backing the cia gave khomeini during the revolution. The same is true for rafsanjani and mohammed forouzandeh, two people who have helped shape the image of Iran as a nightmare state the way Milosevic did for Yugoslavia, cronies all yet falsely portrayed as freedom fighters. It should be no coincidence that mousavi’s cousin is CinC of Iran’s Air Force, in other words in a position where he could effect Iran’s safety in the event of an invasion the same way members of Iraq’s military betrayed Saddam Hussein in 2003. Nor should we forget how reza pahlavi and farah diba pahlavi have come out in support of the green movement, tarnishing any legitimacy they have to their claim as iran’s deposed ruling house and tarnishing Royalists and Monarchists, not to mention iran’s aristocratic families who can trace their ancestry to Iran’s previous ruling houses.
Even were the masses of Iranians not direct collaborators of the cia and cfr they certainly have been influenced by their works. Since the 1990’s the majority of Iranians who have travelled to America and the west have done so as students. Those students who prosper do so not so much by good grades but by debasing their heritage and going along with every negative stereotype of Iranians the west creates. This group is isolated from Iranians who travelled to the west before the revolution socially, except for immediate family, and tends to take high paying jobs and to piss cash on useless luxuries, exemplifying the worst stereotypes of westerners. Furthermore, they have not taken a serious interest in other groups who have been disenfranchised and victimized by American and western actions. Rather once they achieve wealth and material possessions they fell they are successful and care about nobody else. This attitude has cost the green movement the support of the very activist groups who assisted the Iranian community in preventing an invasion.
Those who can’t look at the facts are doomed to fail. One of the greatest problems with Iranian civilization is that when things get tough most Iranians choose to escape into the world of excuses rather than face harsh reality. This is what is happening again and we need to wake up, face harsh reality, and get ourselves together or face extinction.
Those that say that this is a human rights movement need to ask themselves some important questions. First, if human rights has been a long standing issue then why have there not been riots for years in Iran? If conditions are as bad as are claimed then Iran’s population would never have tolerated it for any length of time. Plus amnesty international and other groups which report on human rights have not always reported the truth about Iranian “atrocity” stories or Iranian affairs. They do not mention facts like how honor killings and other female abuse stories are confined only to Iran’s practicing muslim population, or how branches of groups like the Persian cultural foundation are nonexistent. Then again seeing how that amnesty international has recently been packed by Iranians who spew such lies it is not surprising, yet all the same it is disgusting and disgraceful. If you question my reasoning consider this. Many of these same Iranians have been long opponents of war with America and Israel, though many of them have avoided taking any direct action and instead relied on the actions of others. Second, most Iranian groups were shut down and harassed as political groups because they did not spew the negative image that many in gpvernment and positions of power in the west have of Iran and Iranians. Along comes these uprisings in Iran under the guise of the green movement and all of a sudden those who support the green movement do not face negative stigma, as if to personify hajji baba for the 21st century.
The argument that it is a freedom movement fails when one asks, like above, why there were no mass uprisings before the June 2009 elections? Furthermore consider the uprisings were backed and instigated by politicians inside and outside of Iran who have had connections with the cia and the council on foreign relations. People forget that mousavi was a long time crony of khomeini, and we need not go into detail about the backing the cia gave khomeini during the revolution. The same is true for rafsanjani and mohammed forouzandeh, two people who have helped shape the image of Iran as a nightmare state the way Milosevic did for Yugoslavia, cronies all yet falsely portrayed as freedom fighters. It should be no coincidence that mousavi’s cousin is CinC of Iran’s Air Force, in other words in a position where he could effect Iran’s safety in the event of an invasion the same way members of Iraq’s military betrayed Saddam Hussein in 2003. Nor should we forget how reza pahlavi and farah diba pahlavi have come out in support of the green movement, tarnishing any legitimacy they have to their claim as iran’s deposed ruling house and tarnishing Royalists and Monarchists, not to mention iran’s aristocratic families who can trace their ancestry to Iran’s previous ruling houses.
Even were the masses of Iranians not direct collaborators of the cia and cfr they certainly have been influenced by their works. Since the 1990’s the majority of Iranians who have travelled to America and the west have done so as students. Those students who prosper do so not so much by good grades but by debasing their heritage and going along with every negative stereotype of Iranians the west creates. This group is isolated from Iranians who travelled to the west before the revolution socially, except for immediate family, and tends to take high paying jobs and to piss cash on useless luxuries, exemplifying the worst stereotypes of westerners. Furthermore, they have not taken a serious interest in other groups who have been disenfranchised and victimized by American and western actions. Rather once they achieve wealth and material possessions they fell they are successful and care about nobody else. This attitude has cost the green movement the support of the very activist groups who assisted the Iranian community in preventing an invasion.
Those who can’t look at the facts are doomed to fail. One of the greatest problems with Iranian civilization is that when things get tough most Iranians choose to escape into the world of excuses rather than face harsh reality. This is what is happening again and we need to wake up, face harsh reality, and get ourselves together or face extinction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)