Recently some pieces of news regarding the status of washington trust and it’s behaviors have surfaced.
First, the location washington trust vacated at 180 washington st during December 5-8 2008 has now been purchased by Coastway. That is the same location which pressed charges against me in 2006, the proceedings of which I have detailed too well. Oddly enough, washington trust does not put the details of their dropping that location on their site.
Online discrepancies led me to investigate washington trust’s Wellesley MA asset. In 2005 washington trust acquired Weston financial, however their website does not specify what kind of services they offer so I went there in person to find out. Oddly enough they had no washington trust paraphernalia there, despite the fact that washingotn trust owns them outright, as they told me. When they asked me the purpose of my wanting Zendran inheritance dispute update
to know more and mentioned my inheritance/trust dispute and current judicial probe they first thought I was joking until I showed them the contact info of the Judge investigating my situation and the file numbers for the court cases from 2006-7, which they claimed they knew nothing about. Oddly when leaving I spotted a Wellesley pd car at the corner of Worcester and William Sts. which was not there when I first entered the business park where Weston financial is located.
Another reason for my visit, which I did not mention to them at the bank, was learning of an incident in December 2009 leslie yeransian, who I was close to, had $1000 stolen from her in a bank transfer in Wellesley Hills, details of which can be found here
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/transfer-stolen-c286193.html
What is most noticeable when one looks closely is that those two locations are close by, and the fact that Wellesley is where washinbgton trust decided to begin expanding into Mass. Everyone in the legal situation I have mentioned this to believes this was no coincidence, noting that not only did this coincide with washington trust’s move from the abovementioned location but with the open letter I put on my blog to leslie, namely whoever was responsible for messing with leslie’s finances there is also responsible for messing with me, and it points in the direction of washington trust. I even paid the people at bank of America Wellesley hills a visit, they were so nosy, knew their regulars well, and many people there didn’t know simple banking like how to make change.
Peter Z
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Sunday, May 30, 2010
The good, bad, and ugly of shit u’s commencement
Recently I attended events involving brown’s commencement and had interesting experiences.
The good; I managed to find decent food at most events. Plus Dr. Khrushchev was glad to see me on brown campus again, telling me I did the right thing in April 2008. Interestingly enough most people remembered me.
The bad; There was a thunderstorm, and though it was nice to see the shitings there get soaked I had to deal with it as well.
The ugly; The shit u pigs would stop what they were doing when they would see me and observe. They can’t stand the fact the law is now on my side and not theirs, not to mention their dirty deeds have come to light.
Peter Z
The good; I managed to find decent food at most events. Plus Dr. Khrushchev was glad to see me on brown campus again, telling me I did the right thing in April 2008. Interestingly enough most people remembered me.
The bad; There was a thunderstorm, and though it was nice to see the shitings there get soaked I had to deal with it as well.
The ugly; The shit u pigs would stop what they were doing when they would see me and observe. They can’t stand the fact the law is now on my side and not theirs, not to mention their dirty deeds have come to light.
Peter Z
Saturday, April 24, 2010
The Truth about the armenian genocide
Recently I attended some armenian genocide and cultural events I was invited to. I went in a neutral frame of mind, as my paternal grandmother’s father served in the Ottoman military who’s service included killing armenians. If there was one thing that stood out at those events, and whenever armenians commemorate their culture and the genocide they infuse it with myths of their own making, even worse than the jews, and behave so insufferably that whatever feelings of sympathy one expresses come from coercion and one feels that the “sufferings” of armenians are their own fault, which they in truth are. Here I will clarify the myths of the armenian genocide which the armenians make part of their own culture.
One thing the armenians throw around is that they are persecuted because they are christian. Peope who know history know that the romans forced the armenians to convert to the evil that is christianity from Zoroastrianism when armenia was a roman vassal. When Shabour II reconquered armenian for Iran he encouraged the armenians to revert back to Zoroastrianism. Instead agitators like vartan mamikonian who had been brainwashed by roman christians agitated the armenians to revolt, and him and his followers were rightfully ahnilliated at the battle of Avariar. It wa sonly some 3 centuries later that christianity became widespread among the armenians after the Muslims conquered Iran. Had the armenians never adopted christianity their suffering never would have occurred, furthermore it set them up for their problems which began in the 19th century.
They began during the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and it was with him and his armenian mother that these problems began. Throughout history the Ottoman Sultans had fathered heirs with women from countries and peoples they were at war with, be it Serbians, Italians, French, Russians, etc. However all were raised as good Ottomans. Abdul Hamid II’s mother had him baptized as an armenian christian with the name bedros, making him a freak before the House of Osman and scarring him for life. Even worse Abdul Hamid II, aka bedros, grew up during a time when England, france, Austria, and Russia were using the pretence of protecting Christians to invade Ottoman territory, a practice which continued once he became Sultan in 1876. He had to make a decision, and his decision was based on the treatment he received once he became bedros. What else could he do? The armenians were collaborating with the Russians, as so many had entered Russian service, even obtaining prominent positions in the Russian government, and threatening Turkish society as well. They collaborated with the French and british as well, the very foreign powers who were seizing Ottoman lands and threatening the lives of Turks and all Ottoman subjects. There was only one solution, get rid of the armenians, kill them, seize their property, do everything to make them so miserable they would soon not be around. And what did the armenians do? Sure they attempted resistance at first, but then once they realized it was hopeless it ceased and they died, fled, and began spreading myths about why they were persecuted.
If they thought this would stop when Abdul Hamid II was deposed in 1909 they were wrong. Here the armenians blame everything on Talaat Pasha, Enver Pasha, and Jemal Pasha, not realizing those three were merely disciples of the deposed bedros. It was Talaat Pasha who would legislate against the armenians, hoping to outdo the Sultan, the other two, along with the rest of the Ottoman government, simply went along, as it was the law to go after those subversive enemies of the state the armenians. Then came the war. Once Germany entered on the side of Austria-Hungary to defend it against Russia the Ottomans were sought as allies by both Germany and the allies of Russia. It was the seizure of Turkish goods by the allies of Russia that brought the Ottomans on the side of Germany and against the very powers the armenians had been collaborating with. Then came 1915 and the attempt by the british and French to force open the straits by occupying them from the Ottomans. People forget that on April 24, 1915 the Ottomans had been informed that the british and French were invading, something had to be done, and that meant going after the enemies of the Ottomans at the straits and elsewhere, including the armenians. This meant only one thing, kill them wherever they were, after all because of their collaboration they were the enemy. Had they never collaborated with the british and French during the reign of bedros none of their sufferings would have occurred.
What of them afterwards. Those who survived, instead of facing the facts about what had happened, began to create myths, claiming they were the victims when in fact their sufferings were as much their own fault. After all, the Kurds and Greeks had the same problems from the Ottomans yet they did not make the same complaints. Despite the fact that Germany and it’s allies, including the nations created out of the Habsburg empire, had been allied with the Ottomans many armenians fled to those very countries. In fact, when nazi Germany invaded Russia many armenians fought on the side of the nazis, including some who had briefly established an armenian republic around Yerevan, as they saw the nazis as liberators. It was also the nazis who provided the armenians with fodder for their own myths in the form of the jewish holocaust. Like the armenians the jews were persecuted by their own kind inside Germany, and to shame others into giving them what they wanted by claiming they were the victims, and also becoming like social vermin wherever they went. Like the jews they also use coercive education about their genocide to create awareness, presenting the facts so that when one expresses any sympathy it is often made out of coercion, especially as they exhibit the history of their genocide in the same way Norman Finkelstein has complained about how his own people misrepresent their holocaust.
Today it is what the armenians have done differently from the jews and other groups like the jews that stands out. While the jews have welcomed Germans who speak of reconciliation because of the holocaust, the armenians have used the events of 1915 to demonize people of Turkish ancestry in their past, the only ethnic group in history which makes hating another group of people part of their culture, even Turks like Orhan Pamuk have not been welcome by the armenians the way Benedict XVI and Gerhard Schroder has been by the jews. Not to mention those armenians presented as prominent only pollute their professions and societies, like dr kevorkian who kills patients, vartan gregorian who pisses cash into do nothing artistic and educational institutions, the kardashian jendeh who encourage dissolute lifestyles, kirk kerkorian who makes shark business deals, etc.
When one is looking at a person or group of people who claim to be the victims of a catastrophic occurrence one must consider if anything was done to precipitate that occurrence. In the case of the armenians the more one looks at their history the more one sees they have done everything to bring their problems on themselves, and one begins to feel like I have recently, the only bad thing about the armenian genocide was that people like that great-grandfather of mine who participated in it did not finish the job.
One thing the armenians throw around is that they are persecuted because they are christian. Peope who know history know that the romans forced the armenians to convert to the evil that is christianity from Zoroastrianism when armenia was a roman vassal. When Shabour II reconquered armenian for Iran he encouraged the armenians to revert back to Zoroastrianism. Instead agitators like vartan mamikonian who had been brainwashed by roman christians agitated the armenians to revolt, and him and his followers were rightfully ahnilliated at the battle of Avariar. It wa sonly some 3 centuries later that christianity became widespread among the armenians after the Muslims conquered Iran. Had the armenians never adopted christianity their suffering never would have occurred, furthermore it set them up for their problems which began in the 19th century.
They began during the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and it was with him and his armenian mother that these problems began. Throughout history the Ottoman Sultans had fathered heirs with women from countries and peoples they were at war with, be it Serbians, Italians, French, Russians, etc. However all were raised as good Ottomans. Abdul Hamid II’s mother had him baptized as an armenian christian with the name bedros, making him a freak before the House of Osman and scarring him for life. Even worse Abdul Hamid II, aka bedros, grew up during a time when England, france, Austria, and Russia were using the pretence of protecting Christians to invade Ottoman territory, a practice which continued once he became Sultan in 1876. He had to make a decision, and his decision was based on the treatment he received once he became bedros. What else could he do? The armenians were collaborating with the Russians, as so many had entered Russian service, even obtaining prominent positions in the Russian government, and threatening Turkish society as well. They collaborated with the French and british as well, the very foreign powers who were seizing Ottoman lands and threatening the lives of Turks and all Ottoman subjects. There was only one solution, get rid of the armenians, kill them, seize their property, do everything to make them so miserable they would soon not be around. And what did the armenians do? Sure they attempted resistance at first, but then once they realized it was hopeless it ceased and they died, fled, and began spreading myths about why they were persecuted.
If they thought this would stop when Abdul Hamid II was deposed in 1909 they were wrong. Here the armenians blame everything on Talaat Pasha, Enver Pasha, and Jemal Pasha, not realizing those three were merely disciples of the deposed bedros. It was Talaat Pasha who would legislate against the armenians, hoping to outdo the Sultan, the other two, along with the rest of the Ottoman government, simply went along, as it was the law to go after those subversive enemies of the state the armenians. Then came the war. Once Germany entered on the side of Austria-Hungary to defend it against Russia the Ottomans were sought as allies by both Germany and the allies of Russia. It was the seizure of Turkish goods by the allies of Russia that brought the Ottomans on the side of Germany and against the very powers the armenians had been collaborating with. Then came 1915 and the attempt by the british and French to force open the straits by occupying them from the Ottomans. People forget that on April 24, 1915 the Ottomans had been informed that the british and French were invading, something had to be done, and that meant going after the enemies of the Ottomans at the straits and elsewhere, including the armenians. This meant only one thing, kill them wherever they were, after all because of their collaboration they were the enemy. Had they never collaborated with the british and French during the reign of bedros none of their sufferings would have occurred.
What of them afterwards. Those who survived, instead of facing the facts about what had happened, began to create myths, claiming they were the victims when in fact their sufferings were as much their own fault. After all, the Kurds and Greeks had the same problems from the Ottomans yet they did not make the same complaints. Despite the fact that Germany and it’s allies, including the nations created out of the Habsburg empire, had been allied with the Ottomans many armenians fled to those very countries. In fact, when nazi Germany invaded Russia many armenians fought on the side of the nazis, including some who had briefly established an armenian republic around Yerevan, as they saw the nazis as liberators. It was also the nazis who provided the armenians with fodder for their own myths in the form of the jewish holocaust. Like the armenians the jews were persecuted by their own kind inside Germany, and to shame others into giving them what they wanted by claiming they were the victims, and also becoming like social vermin wherever they went. Like the jews they also use coercive education about their genocide to create awareness, presenting the facts so that when one expresses any sympathy it is often made out of coercion, especially as they exhibit the history of their genocide in the same way Norman Finkelstein has complained about how his own people misrepresent their holocaust.
Today it is what the armenians have done differently from the jews and other groups like the jews that stands out. While the jews have welcomed Germans who speak of reconciliation because of the holocaust, the armenians have used the events of 1915 to demonize people of Turkish ancestry in their past, the only ethnic group in history which makes hating another group of people part of their culture, even Turks like Orhan Pamuk have not been welcome by the armenians the way Benedict XVI and Gerhard Schroder has been by the jews. Not to mention those armenians presented as prominent only pollute their professions and societies, like dr kevorkian who kills patients, vartan gregorian who pisses cash into do nothing artistic and educational institutions, the kardashian jendeh who encourage dissolute lifestyles, kirk kerkorian who makes shark business deals, etc.
When one is looking at a person or group of people who claim to be the victims of a catastrophic occurrence one must consider if anything was done to precipitate that occurrence. In the case of the armenians the more one looks at their history the more one sees they have done everything to bring their problems on themselves, and one begins to feel like I have recently, the only bad thing about the armenian genocide was that people like that great-grandfather of mine who participated in it did not finish the job.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Princess Leila, facts about her being maligned by wikipedia
Recently wikipedia, like the rest of wikimedia, has chosen to defame the memory of Princess Leila by rigging it’s website to put up false information about her life and to harass those who mention the truth. Here I am clarifying the points where wikipedia is wrong and putting the facts.
False wiki fact 1; Princess Leila graduated from brown university in 1992.
TRUTH; Princess Leila never graduated from brown, dropping out in 1991, according to many people who knew her as a student she was hazed out by harassment from other faculty and students. All students at brown are listed by their graduation year regardless of whether or not they graduated from brown.
False wiki fact 2; Princess Leila suffered from depression.
TRUTH; No credible clinical diagnosis was ever made of Princess Leila as to whether or not she suffered from depression or any other mental illness.
False wiki fact 3; Princess Leila was found with a lethal dose of quinalbarbitone and a non lethal dose of cocaine in her body on June 10, 2001 according to the coroner’s report on her death.
TRUTH; There is no one credible version of the coroner’s report on her. The report is self-contradictory in stating the quinalbarbitone was lethal but not the cocaine. Furthermore, it is stated she had taken the drugs in Paris before flying to London, however if she had taken that dosage which was reported she never would have survived the flight. The version in the bbc was released on the bbc’s website years after death due to public pressure but no credible print version was found about Princess Leila’s death. Media reports conflict as to how she was found dead, some saying she was found with a phone cord wrapped around her neck. In her mother’s memoirs released in 2004 Farah clearly mentions she ordered the doctor to go into Leila’s hotel room despite Leila telling her mother she did not want to have any contact with her when she was in London.
False wiki fact 4; Princess Leila stole drugs to fuel a drug habit according to the telegraph.
TRUTH; No law enforcement complaint was ever filed against Princess Leila during her lifetime.
It should be further noted that when viewing the history of those who made the changes putting the false information many of those who put that false info are listed as being jewish. I should not have to go into detail how since the creation of the zionist state of israel how the jewish community has maligned facts about Iranian history and people.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
False wiki fact 1; Princess Leila graduated from brown university in 1992.
TRUTH; Princess Leila never graduated from brown, dropping out in 1991, according to many people who knew her as a student she was hazed out by harassment from other faculty and students. All students at brown are listed by their graduation year regardless of whether or not they graduated from brown.
False wiki fact 2; Princess Leila suffered from depression.
TRUTH; No credible clinical diagnosis was ever made of Princess Leila as to whether or not she suffered from depression or any other mental illness.
False wiki fact 3; Princess Leila was found with a lethal dose of quinalbarbitone and a non lethal dose of cocaine in her body on June 10, 2001 according to the coroner’s report on her death.
TRUTH; There is no one credible version of the coroner’s report on her. The report is self-contradictory in stating the quinalbarbitone was lethal but not the cocaine. Furthermore, it is stated she had taken the drugs in Paris before flying to London, however if she had taken that dosage which was reported she never would have survived the flight. The version in the bbc was released on the bbc’s website years after death due to public pressure but no credible print version was found about Princess Leila’s death. Media reports conflict as to how she was found dead, some saying she was found with a phone cord wrapped around her neck. In her mother’s memoirs released in 2004 Farah clearly mentions she ordered the doctor to go into Leila’s hotel room despite Leila telling her mother she did not want to have any contact with her when she was in London.
False wiki fact 4; Princess Leila stole drugs to fuel a drug habit according to the telegraph.
TRUTH; No law enforcement complaint was ever filed against Princess Leila during her lifetime.
It should be further noted that when viewing the history of those who made the changes putting the false information many of those who put that false info are listed as being jewish. I should not have to go into detail how since the creation of the zionist state of israel how the jewish community has maligned facts about Iranian history and people.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
Monday, March 22, 2010
Zendran case, Major life altering update
Recently I have learned that the lawyer who helped embezzle my fortune in the 1990's, f thomas lenihan has died, and the news was broken to me in a very unusual way.
On March 17, 2010 I was walking past his law office on my way to the train station around 5:40 PM when I noticed on his nameboard the dates 1939-2003 underneath his name, which had not been there when I walked by 3 1/2 hours earlier nor had they been up there at any point between that point in time and 2003. Thinking it was a St. Patricks day joke I checked with the RI Bar Association to find out if this was true. Upon checking I found he was not listed among RI lawyers and that he was dead, and this was confirmed by an article in the Westerly Sun here
http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/article_875d29f2-e8c2-11de-becf-001cc4c002e0.html
Apparently his family and law firm had been keeping his name on the law firm and kept the impression he was alive. This false belief was perpetuated by the fact he is listed in West Legal directory
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/2628420_1?channel=LP
and on Attorneys listed
http://www.attorneyslisted.com/update/Westerly/Rhode%20Island/F%20Thomas%20Lenihan.aspx
This comes at a time when the Courts have been contacting his firm on my behalf telling him to make all records on me available or they will subopena him and the records, after evidence of foul play has been revealed.
This is a major win for me, for even though I have not gained any money tommy lenihan is no longer in a position to do to me and others harm through the legal system. This man was and is one of the most hated men and lawyers in Westerly, RI, and the country who had done hundreds of people wrong. Now he and his firm are beginning to get theirs.
Peter Z
On March 17, 2010 I was walking past his law office on my way to the train station around 5:40 PM when I noticed on his nameboard the dates 1939-2003 underneath his name, which had not been there when I walked by 3 1/2 hours earlier nor had they been up there at any point between that point in time and 2003. Thinking it was a St. Patricks day joke I checked with the RI Bar Association to find out if this was true. Upon checking I found he was not listed among RI lawyers and that he was dead, and this was confirmed by an article in the Westerly Sun here
http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/article_875d29f2-e8c2-11de-becf-001cc4c002e0.html
Apparently his family and law firm had been keeping his name on the law firm and kept the impression he was alive. This false belief was perpetuated by the fact he is listed in West Legal directory
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/2628420_1?channel=LP
and on Attorneys listed
http://www.attorneyslisted.com/update/Westerly/Rhode%20Island/F%20Thomas%20Lenihan.aspx
This comes at a time when the Courts have been contacting his firm on my behalf telling him to make all records on me available or they will subopena him and the records, after evidence of foul play has been revealed.
This is a major win for me, for even though I have not gained any money tommy lenihan is no longer in a position to do to me and others harm through the legal system. This man was and is one of the most hated men and lawyers in Westerly, RI, and the country who had done hundreds of people wrong. Now he and his firm are beginning to get theirs.
Peter Z
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
No Ruz oddness at brown
Last night I attended a naqqal performance of Bijan e Manizeh at brown, put on by professor iraj anvar, being invited there by the Iranian association of boston. Only a few people from boston were there, just a few people there I recognized out of a crowd of 30 odd people. The inglissi translation was not very precise and the Farsi performance was a newer edition. , and when I asked iraj about that he just got an attitude.
Worst of all was when leaving I noticed one of the brown pigs had parked his car at the watson istitute, which is next door. A few minutes later once I was on the trolley that same pig was driving around the block. And this after the providence police assured me that the brown pigs would leave me alone as I was invited legitimately.
As it turns out I am not the only one openly complaining about the brown pigs. Recently Episcopal Charities has been complaining about how the brown pigs have been harassing poor people going to the meal site at st. stephens, which is on george st but has brown buildings around it. When confronted by EC brown has suggested that they bus people to and from the meal site. Needless to say EC and many people are now NOT happy with brown.
Peter Z
Worst of all was when leaving I noticed one of the brown pigs had parked his car at the watson istitute, which is next door. A few minutes later once I was on the trolley that same pig was driving around the block. And this after the providence police assured me that the brown pigs would leave me alone as I was invited legitimately.
As it turns out I am not the only one openly complaining about the brown pigs. Recently Episcopal Charities has been complaining about how the brown pigs have been harassing poor people going to the meal site at st. stephens, which is on george st but has brown buildings around it. When confronted by EC brown has suggested that they bus people to and from the meal site. Needless to say EC and many people are now NOT happy with brown.
Peter Z
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
More watson/shit u oddness going around.
Recently more oddness has been going on around watson/shit u, and not just their pigs staring at me giving everyone there the finger whenever I go by.
1. Recently greg chafee, linc chafee's brother and wacri president, has begun listing wacri events on the watson institute's website. Only thing is those events are NOT open to the public, rather they are restricted to elitsists. My membership with wacri was terminated after I flashbacked when put in the room with brown administration who caused the legal problems I had and the hope club complained, however those of my contacts there who knew my situation refunded my memberhsip. This also creates a conflict as linc chafee went out of his brown contract early, so something is up. Contact greg at gregchafeewacri@gmail.com or call (401) 228-8657 to find out more about these elitists.
2. Recently salman rushdie returned to brown, this time they dropped the pig squad, why is anyone's guess as they've been all over campus at places where there are no problems.
3. Reently the Midle East studies dpt has been packed with zionists including omer bartov, martha joukowsky, nina tannenwald by that tramp cammett a far cry when I was there, and are focusing on irrelevant topics. Mosst concerning is bartov, whose "research" nas taken him into areas where my family has been and thus put him in a position to snoop on myself.
4. Recently lucnida waston has become involved with sarah lawrence college. The family that created sarah lawrence college are part owners with me at kensico cemetary, I wonder if lucinda or the fucks at watson/brown are aware of it?
Peter Z
1. Recently greg chafee, linc chafee's brother and wacri president, has begun listing wacri events on the watson institute's website. Only thing is those events are NOT open to the public, rather they are restricted to elitsists. My membership with wacri was terminated after I flashbacked when put in the room with brown administration who caused the legal problems I had and the hope club complained, however those of my contacts there who knew my situation refunded my memberhsip. This also creates a conflict as linc chafee went out of his brown contract early, so something is up. Contact greg at gregchafeewacri@gmail.com or call (401) 228-8657 to find out more about these elitists.
2. Recently salman rushdie returned to brown, this time they dropped the pig squad, why is anyone's guess as they've been all over campus at places where there are no problems.
3. Reently the Midle East studies dpt has been packed with zionists including omer bartov, martha joukowsky, nina tannenwald by that tramp cammett a far cry when I was there, and are focusing on irrelevant topics. Mosst concerning is bartov, whose "research" nas taken him into areas where my family has been and thus put him in a position to snoop on myself.
4. Recently lucnida waston has become involved with sarah lawrence college. The family that created sarah lawrence college are part owners with me at kensico cemetary, I wonder if lucinda or the fucks at watson/brown are aware of it?
Peter Z
Monday, February 15, 2010
These mousavi's are more dangerous
With all the attention being focused on mir hussein mousavi's cia ties
most people are ignoring 2 of his cousins who serve in Iran's militaty.
One is Commander of Army's 4th naval zone Seyed Mahmoud Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8805101306
The other is Iranian Army Lieutenant Commander, General Abdolrahim
Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8809081568
Notice both these individuals occupy key positions in Iran's military
and are related to mir hussein mousavi. Should an invasion occur these
individuals probably might switch sides and frag Iranian forces.
Remember, the defection of baath members at the start of the Iraqi
invasin did more damage to Saddam Hussein than any amrikan attacks.
Peter Khan Zendran
most people are ignoring 2 of his cousins who serve in Iran's militaty.
One is Commander of Army's 4th naval zone Seyed Mahmoud Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8805101306
The other is Iranian Army Lieutenant Commander, General Abdolrahim
Mousavi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8809081568
Notice both these individuals occupy key positions in Iran's military
and are related to mir hussein mousavi. Should an invasion occur these
individuals probably might switch sides and frag Iranian forces.
Remember, the defection of baath members at the start of the Iraqi
invasin did more damage to Saddam Hussein than any amrikan attacks.
Peter Khan Zendran
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
Iran targeted for american missle attack
Notice this comes at a time when the amrikan backed "green movement" has
been cracked down on and at a time when amrikan and zionist plans to
attack Iran over it's military buildup and nuclear program are being
kicked around. People forget Iran's nuclear program is to benefit Iran
and iran's military buildup is defensive, unlike amrika which has no
business in the gulf.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8811131832
2010-02-02 - 18:13
MP Decries Reinforcement of US Military Buildup in Region
TEHRAN (FNA)- A senior Iranian lawmaker on Tuesday strongly criticized
the United States' new military move in the Persian Gulf, warning that
the measure would endanger peace and security in the region.
"The US move to set up a new military base in the region runs counter to
the path of regional and international stability, peace and security,"
Rapporteur of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy
Commission Kazzem Jalali told FNA, cautioning that the measure is not
mere manifestation of a political stance.
He pointed out that Washington is seeking a strong and direct military
presence in the region after its different scenarios for the Middle-East
failed.
Reminding that the US move would serve the interests of those countries
producing new and modern weapons, Jalali said, "The US measure will
cause discord and differences in the region, which would serve their
interests."
Jalali further underlined that the US move is also aimed at inspiring
the regional states with a feeling of Iranophobia to divert attentions
from the threat of the foreign forces' military presence in the region.
"The regional states should realize that peace and stability in the
region can be materialized through establishment of a new and modern
collective security system in the region," Jalali concluded.
Jalai's remarks came two days after US officials said on Sunday that the
United States has expanded land- and sea-based missile defense systems
in and around the Persian Gulf to counter what it sees as Iran's growing
missile threat.
Four Mideast countries to have the US system are Kuwait, the United Arab
Emirates, Bahrain - which also hosts the US Navy's 5th Fleet
headquarters - and Qatar, which has a modernized US air operations
center that played a key role in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
General David Petraeus, the US Central Command chief responsible for US
military operations across the Middle East, said the US now has eight
Patriot missile batteries stationed in the Persian Gulf region - two
each in four countries.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
been cracked down on and at a time when amrikan and zionist plans to
attack Iran over it's military buildup and nuclear program are being
kicked around. People forget Iran's nuclear program is to benefit Iran
and iran's military buildup is defensive, unlike amrika which has no
business in the gulf.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8811131832
2010-02-02 - 18:13
MP Decries Reinforcement of US Military Buildup in Region
TEHRAN (FNA)- A senior Iranian lawmaker on Tuesday strongly criticized
the United States' new military move in the Persian Gulf, warning that
the measure would endanger peace and security in the region.
"The US move to set up a new military base in the region runs counter to
the path of regional and international stability, peace and security,"
Rapporteur of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy
Commission Kazzem Jalali told FNA, cautioning that the measure is not
mere manifestation of a political stance.
He pointed out that Washington is seeking a strong and direct military
presence in the region after its different scenarios for the Middle-East
failed.
Reminding that the US move would serve the interests of those countries
producing new and modern weapons, Jalali said, "The US measure will
cause discord and differences in the region, which would serve their
interests."
Jalali further underlined that the US move is also aimed at inspiring
the regional states with a feeling of Iranophobia to divert attentions
from the threat of the foreign forces' military presence in the region.
"The regional states should realize that peace and stability in the
region can be materialized through establishment of a new and modern
collective security system in the region," Jalali concluded.
Jalai's remarks came two days after US officials said on Sunday that the
United States has expanded land- and sea-based missile defense systems
in and around the Persian Gulf to counter what it sees as Iran's growing
missile threat.
Four Mideast countries to have the US system are Kuwait, the United Arab
Emirates, Bahrain - which also hosts the US Navy's 5th Fleet
headquarters - and Qatar, which has a modernized US air operations
center that played a key role in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
General David Petraeus, the US Central Command chief responsible for US
military operations across the Middle East, said the US now has eight
Patriot missile batteries stationed in the Persian Gulf region - two
each in four countries.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Iran menaced by zionist attack as amrika openly backs rioters in Iran
If anyone needs more proof that the "green movement" is really to
destabilize Iran in preperation for an invasion read this. People
forget that the zionists running isreal are diehard warhawks who would
jump at any chance to attack Iran, and Mottaki and many inside Iran
realize this. Notice this is coming out as proof is coming out of
american backing of the green movement. The more this proof comes out
the more people see that clinton, holbrooke, gates, emmanuel, and others
are bigger niggers than the president.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8810231478
2010-01-13 - 17:56
Mottaki Downplays Israeli Attack on Iran
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Wednesday
rejected the speculations that the US and Israel might launch an attack
against the country, stressing that the Zionist regime does not dare to
attack Iran.
We believe that the Zionist regime is not experiencing proper conditions
to dare to attack Iran, Mottaki told reporters in a joint press
conference with his Omani counterpart Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdallah here
in Tehran today.
The Iranian top diplomat also described the possibility of a military
attack against Iran's nuclear installations as media propaganda by the
Zionists and Americans which was heated during the presidency of George
W. Bush.
"Since its illegal establishment in the region, Israel has brought the
Muslim people of the region nothing but problem, annoyance, aggression,
terror and massacre," he added.
"Israel is a useless member which has been imposed on the region,"
Mottaki said, reminding that due to the aggressive nature of the Israeli
regime, it should always be watched and monitored.
Speculations that Israel could bomb Iran mounted after a big Israeli air
drill in 2008. In the first week of June 2008, 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15
fighters reportedly took part in an exercise over the eastern
Mediterranean and Greece, which was interpreted as a dress rehearsal for
a possible attack on Iran's nuclear installations.
Israel and its close ally the United States accuse Iran of seeking a
nuclear weapon, while they have never presented any corroborative
document to substantiate their allegations. Both Washington and Tel Aviv
possess advanced weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear
warheads.
Iran vehemently denies the charges, insisting that its nuclear program
is for peaceful purposes only. Tehran stresses that the country has
always pursued a civilian path to provide power to the growing number of
Iranian population, whose fossil fuel would eventually run dry.
Iran has warned that it would target Israel and its worldwide interests
in case it comes under attack by the Tel Aviv.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
MIDDLE EAST NEWS
JANUARY 9, 2010.U.S. Shifts Iran Focus to Support Opposition
.ArticleComments (145)more in World ».
EmailPrintSave This ↓ More.
.facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
+ More close Yahoo! BuzzMySpacedel.icio.usRedditLinkedInFarkViadeoOrkut
Text .
By JAY SOLOMON
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is increasingly questioning the
long-term stability of Tehran's government and moving to find ways to
support Iran's opposition "Green Movement," said senior U.S. officials.
The White House is crafting new financial sanctions specifically
designed to punish the Iranian entities and individuals most directly
involved in the crackdown on Iran's dissident forces, said the U.S.
officials, rather than just those involved in Iran's nuclear program.
View Full Image
Sipa Press The U.S. is seeking ways to help Iran's opposition, led by
figures such as Mahdi Karroubi (pictured).
.
U.S. Treasury Department strategists already have been focusing on
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has emerged as the economic and
military power behind Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
In recent weeks, senior Green Movement figures -- who have been speaking
at major Washington think tanks -- have made up a list of IRGC-related
companies they suggest targeting, which has been forwarded to the Obama
administration by third parties.
Names on the list include Iran's largest telecommunications provider,
Telecommunication Company of Iran, which is majority-owned by the IRGC,
and the Iranian Aluminum Co. A U.S. official involved in Iran said the
administration wouldn't comment on whether it was acting on the
information.
American diplomats, meanwhile, have begun drawing comparisons in public
between Iran's current political turmoil and the events that led up to
the 1979 overthrow of Shah Reza Pahlavi.
"In my opinion there are many similarities," the State Department's
chief Iran specialist, John Limbert, told Iran-based listeners this week
over U.S. government-run Radio Farda. "I think it's very hard for the
government to decide how to react to the legitimate and lawful demands
of the people."
Since the opposition movement's demonstrations recently peaked after the
death of reformist Islamic cleric Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, a
number of Iran scholars in the U.S. said they have been contacted by
senior administration officials eager to understand if the Iranian
unrest suggested a greater threat to Tehran's government than originally
understood.
View Full Image
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images President Ahmadinejad
.
"The tone has changed in the conversation," said one scholar who
discussed Iran with senior U.S. officials. "There's realization now that
this unrest really matters."
In a signal of the White House's increased attention to Iran's political
upheaval, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered over coffee at the
State Department this week with four leading Iran scholars and mapped
out the current dynamics, said U.S. officials. One issue explored was
how the U.S. should respond if Tehran suddenly expressed a desire to
reach a compromise on the nuclear issue. Mrs. Clinton asked whether the
U.S. could reach a pact without crippling the prospects for the Green
Movement.
U.S. allies are mixed in their response to the new focus. One senior
Arab official said he told State Department officials this week they
were deluded if they though Iran was close to experiencing a revolution
reminiscent of the Shah's overthrow. "The IRGC has its hands on the
Iranian people," the official said.
Israel, which faces the greatest security threat from Iran, says only
widespread sanctions will effectively upend Tehran's current political
leadership. "Many Israeli experts have concluded that expansive
sanctions will widen the schisms between the Iranian government and its
people," said Israel's ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren.
Senior U.S. officials stressed in interviews this week that President
Barack Obama isn't moving toward seeking a regime change as its policy
for Iran. Rather, these officials said, Washington remains committed to
a dual-track approach of pursuing dialogue aimed at ending Iran's
nuclear program while applying increasing financial pressure if the
talks fail.
Both the Obama administration and the Iranian dissidents have been wary
of any direct contacts, due to fears such meetings could provide
ammunition for Tehran. The regime and its supporters continue to put
harsh pressure on the Green Movement; on Friday, progovernment
demonstrators shot at a car carrying a leading opposition figure, Mahdi
Karroubi. He escaped without harm, his Web site reported later.
Still, the White House's re-evaluation of the Green Movement marks a
significant evolution of Mr. Obama's Iran policy since demonstrators
began openly challenging President Ahmadinejad's re-election in June,
said diplomats and analysts.
"The Green Movement has demonstrated more staying power than perhaps
some have anticipated," said a senior U.S. official. "The regime is
internally losing its legitimacy, which is of its own doing."
The White House initially displayed caution in lending any vocal support
to Iranian protesters, as many U.S. and European officials believed
Tehran's security forces would quickly suppress any wide-scale dissent.
U.S. officials repeatedly stressed over the summer that the U.S. was
prioritizing efforts to negotiate with Iran on its nuclear program over
any rapid push for democratic change.
The U.S. response was so timid that some Iranian protesters openly
challenged Mr. Obama. "Obama, Obama -- either with us, or with them!"
Tehran demonstrators were recorded chanting in November.
U.S. officials say that the White House's policy has shifted, in part,
due to the surprising resilience of the Green Movement in the face of
the pervasive crackdown.
The Obama administration has increasingly voiced support for human
rights in Iran as the demonstrations have continued. Mr. Obama used his
Nobel Prize acceptance speech last month to forcefully call for the
respect of human rights and civil liberties.
U.S. officials cite the White House's public mourning of Mr. Montazeri's
death as perhaps the pivotal step in trying to forge common cause with
the opposition.
"Do we expect the current government to be overthrown? I wouldn't say
that at the current time," said a senior State Department official. "But
a crack can certainly grow over time."
Write to Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A7
Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution
and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by
copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please
contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com
More In World
EmailPrinter FriendlyOrder ReprintsShare: facebook
destabilize Iran in preperation for an invasion read this. People
forget that the zionists running isreal are diehard warhawks who would
jump at any chance to attack Iran, and Mottaki and many inside Iran
realize this. Notice this is coming out as proof is coming out of
american backing of the green movement. The more this proof comes out
the more people see that clinton, holbrooke, gates, emmanuel, and others
are bigger niggers than the president.
Peter Khan Zendran
News - English
News numbre: 8810231478
2010-01-13 - 17:56
Mottaki Downplays Israeli Attack on Iran
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Wednesday
rejected the speculations that the US and Israel might launch an attack
against the country, stressing that the Zionist regime does not dare to
attack Iran.
We believe that the Zionist regime is not experiencing proper conditions
to dare to attack Iran, Mottaki told reporters in a joint press
conference with his Omani counterpart Yusuf bin Alawi bin Abdallah here
in Tehran today.
The Iranian top diplomat also described the possibility of a military
attack against Iran's nuclear installations as media propaganda by the
Zionists and Americans which was heated during the presidency of George
W. Bush.
"Since its illegal establishment in the region, Israel has brought the
Muslim people of the region nothing but problem, annoyance, aggression,
terror and massacre," he added.
"Israel is a useless member which has been imposed on the region,"
Mottaki said, reminding that due to the aggressive nature of the Israeli
regime, it should always be watched and monitored.
Speculations that Israel could bomb Iran mounted after a big Israeli air
drill in 2008. In the first week of June 2008, 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15
fighters reportedly took part in an exercise over the eastern
Mediterranean and Greece, which was interpreted as a dress rehearsal for
a possible attack on Iran's nuclear installations.
Israel and its close ally the United States accuse Iran of seeking a
nuclear weapon, while they have never presented any corroborative
document to substantiate their allegations. Both Washington and Tel Aviv
possess advanced weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear
warheads.
Iran vehemently denies the charges, insisting that its nuclear program
is for peaceful purposes only. Tehran stresses that the country has
always pursued a civilian path to provide power to the growing number of
Iranian population, whose fossil fuel would eventually run dry.
Iran has warned that it would target Israel and its worldwide interests
in case it comes under attack by the Tel Aviv.
www.farsnews.com
©2006 Fars News Agency. All Rights Reserved
MIDDLE EAST NEWS
JANUARY 9, 2010.U.S. Shifts Iran Focus to Support Opposition
.ArticleComments (145)more in World ».
EmailPrintSave This ↓ More.
Digg
StumbleUpon
+ More close Yahoo! BuzzMySpacedel.icio.usRedditLinkedInFarkViadeoOrkut
Text .
By JAY SOLOMON
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is increasingly questioning the
long-term stability of Tehran's government and moving to find ways to
support Iran's opposition "Green Movement," said senior U.S. officials.
The White House is crafting new financial sanctions specifically
designed to punish the Iranian entities and individuals most directly
involved in the crackdown on Iran's dissident forces, said the U.S.
officials, rather than just those involved in Iran's nuclear program.
View Full Image
Sipa Press The U.S. is seeking ways to help Iran's opposition, led by
figures such as Mahdi Karroubi (pictured).
.
U.S. Treasury Department strategists already have been focusing on
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has emerged as the economic and
military power behind Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
In recent weeks, senior Green Movement figures -- who have been speaking
at major Washington think tanks -- have made up a list of IRGC-related
companies they suggest targeting, which has been forwarded to the Obama
administration by third parties.
Names on the list include Iran's largest telecommunications provider,
Telecommunication Company of Iran, which is majority-owned by the IRGC,
and the Iranian Aluminum Co. A U.S. official involved in Iran said the
administration wouldn't comment on whether it was acting on the
information.
American diplomats, meanwhile, have begun drawing comparisons in public
between Iran's current political turmoil and the events that led up to
the 1979 overthrow of Shah Reza Pahlavi.
"In my opinion there are many similarities," the State Department's
chief Iran specialist, John Limbert, told Iran-based listeners this week
over U.S. government-run Radio Farda. "I think it's very hard for the
government to decide how to react to the legitimate and lawful demands
of the people."
Since the opposition movement's demonstrations recently peaked after the
death of reformist Islamic cleric Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, a
number of Iran scholars in the U.S. said they have been contacted by
senior administration officials eager to understand if the Iranian
unrest suggested a greater threat to Tehran's government than originally
understood.
View Full Image
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images President Ahmadinejad
.
"The tone has changed in the conversation," said one scholar who
discussed Iran with senior U.S. officials. "There's realization now that
this unrest really matters."
In a signal of the White House's increased attention to Iran's political
upheaval, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered over coffee at the
State Department this week with four leading Iran scholars and mapped
out the current dynamics, said U.S. officials. One issue explored was
how the U.S. should respond if Tehran suddenly expressed a desire to
reach a compromise on the nuclear issue. Mrs. Clinton asked whether the
U.S. could reach a pact without crippling the prospects for the Green
Movement.
U.S. allies are mixed in their response to the new focus. One senior
Arab official said he told State Department officials this week they
were deluded if they though Iran was close to experiencing a revolution
reminiscent of the Shah's overthrow. "The IRGC has its hands on the
Iranian people," the official said.
Israel, which faces the greatest security threat from Iran, says only
widespread sanctions will effectively upend Tehran's current political
leadership. "Many Israeli experts have concluded that expansive
sanctions will widen the schisms between the Iranian government and its
people," said Israel's ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren.
Senior U.S. officials stressed in interviews this week that President
Barack Obama isn't moving toward seeking a regime change as its policy
for Iran. Rather, these officials said, Washington remains committed to
a dual-track approach of pursuing dialogue aimed at ending Iran's
nuclear program while applying increasing financial pressure if the
talks fail.
Both the Obama administration and the Iranian dissidents have been wary
of any direct contacts, due to fears such meetings could provide
ammunition for Tehran. The regime and its supporters continue to put
harsh pressure on the Green Movement; on Friday, progovernment
demonstrators shot at a car carrying a leading opposition figure, Mahdi
Karroubi. He escaped without harm, his Web site reported later.
Still, the White House's re-evaluation of the Green Movement marks a
significant evolution of Mr. Obama's Iran policy since demonstrators
began openly challenging President Ahmadinejad's re-election in June,
said diplomats and analysts.
"The Green Movement has demonstrated more staying power than perhaps
some have anticipated," said a senior U.S. official. "The regime is
internally losing its legitimacy, which is of its own doing."
The White House initially displayed caution in lending any vocal support
to Iranian protesters, as many U.S. and European officials believed
Tehran's security forces would quickly suppress any wide-scale dissent.
U.S. officials repeatedly stressed over the summer that the U.S. was
prioritizing efforts to negotiate with Iran on its nuclear program over
any rapid push for democratic change.
The U.S. response was so timid that some Iranian protesters openly
challenged Mr. Obama. "Obama, Obama -- either with us, or with them!"
Tehran demonstrators were recorded chanting in November.
U.S. officials say that the White House's policy has shifted, in part,
due to the surprising resilience of the Green Movement in the face of
the pervasive crackdown.
The Obama administration has increasingly voiced support for human
rights in Iran as the demonstrations have continued. Mr. Obama used his
Nobel Prize acceptance speech last month to forcefully call for the
respect of human rights and civil liberties.
U.S. officials cite the White House's public mourning of Mr. Montazeri's
death as perhaps the pivotal step in trying to forge common cause with
the opposition.
"Do we expect the current government to be overthrown? I wouldn't say
that at the current time," said a senior State Department official. "But
a crack can certainly grow over time."
Write to Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A7
Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution
and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by
copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please
contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com
More In World
EmailPrinter FriendlyOrder ReprintsShare: facebook
Monday, January 04, 2010
News they're not reporting about Iran
Some of you have heard 2 stories about Iran reported in the news, what you are NOT hearing is the full truth behind them.
In the story about Iran trying to acquire yellowcake from Kazakhstan people forget the following. Not only is that story not true, Kazakhstan is in a position to sell whole nuclear weapons to Iran, so why would Iran seek yellowcake when it could buy whole nuclear weapons from Kazakhstan? One reason for this would be to give a provocation to send an international presence to Iran in the Caspian region, where Iran has Oil interests and where amrika and the cfr are trying to balkanize Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran which has been going on since the bush administration considered it. This leads into the second misreported story.
Some heard how rumors how mousavi and other so called oppostion leaders fled to those 2 caspian provinces when they did not. This has to do with the fact mentioned above that amrika/cfr are considering balkanizing Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran, along with other parts of Iran. Iran has also increased it's military presence in that region and has a cheyene mountain style facility in Mount Damavand, which was put thyere with assistance from mousavi's fellow cia/american backed collaboprator/provacetur mohammed forouzandeh. One reason to kick this around is to increase Iran's presence in that region to either draw vital forces away from more strategic locations or to provoke further conflict.
Speaking of mousavi notice how fars news is hiding stories about mousavi's cousin who is in Iranian Air Force.
Peter Khan Zendran
In the story about Iran trying to acquire yellowcake from Kazakhstan people forget the following. Not only is that story not true, Kazakhstan is in a position to sell whole nuclear weapons to Iran, so why would Iran seek yellowcake when it could buy whole nuclear weapons from Kazakhstan? One reason for this would be to give a provocation to send an international presence to Iran in the Caspian region, where Iran has Oil interests and where amrika and the cfr are trying to balkanize Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran which has been going on since the bush administration considered it. This leads into the second misreported story.
Some heard how rumors how mousavi and other so called oppostion leaders fled to those 2 caspian provinces when they did not. This has to do with the fact mentioned above that amrika/cfr are considering balkanizing Mazendaran and Gilan away from Iran, along with other parts of Iran. Iran has also increased it's military presence in that region and has a cheyene mountain style facility in Mount Damavand, which was put thyere with assistance from mousavi's fellow cia/american backed collaboprator/provacetur mohammed forouzandeh. One reason to kick this around is to increase Iran's presence in that region to either draw vital forces away from more strategic locations or to provoke further conflict.
Speaking of mousavi notice how fars news is hiding stories about mousavi's cousin who is in Iranian Air Force.
Peter Khan Zendran
Bandar Abbas images maligned on google/wiki
As some of you may know google/wiki updated the images for Bandar Abbas
on December 17, showing images that were taken on June 29, 2009. Within
days the wikifreaks did their damage, which can be seen on the link
below.
http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=27.145961&lon=56.2132967&z=17&l=0&m=b
Among their mistakes they identify the Jamaran FFG which is in drydock
incorrectly as "Alvand class Frigate" and the 2 Ghadir class SSK's and 2
Yugo class SSK's are listed as "Unidentifiable Midget Subs" among the
more glaring mistakes. Most notable is the fact that they have deleted
the tags showing the 2 Ghadir class SSK's which are about be launched,
which care visible next to the drydock, as those tags are originals of
mine which I put up there.
Once again, wikimedia is showing usual bias and information
manipulation.
Peter Khan Zendran
on December 17, showing images that were taken on June 29, 2009. Within
days the wikifreaks did their damage, which can be seen on the link
below.
http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=27.145961&lon=56.2132967&z=17&l=0&m=b
Among their mistakes they identify the Jamaran FFG which is in drydock
incorrectly as "Alvand class Frigate" and the 2 Ghadir class SSK's and 2
Yugo class SSK's are listed as "Unidentifiable Midget Subs" among the
more glaring mistakes. Most notable is the fact that they have deleted
the tags showing the 2 Ghadir class SSK's which are about be launched,
which care visible next to the drydock, as those tags are originals of
mine which I put up there.
Once again, wikimedia is showing usual bias and information
manipulation.
Peter Khan Zendran
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Reviving the Pure Faith of Zarathustra
For too long those who follow the faith of Zarathustra have been maligned and misunderstood, to the point where both people who claim to practice the faith of Zarathustra and outsiders get confused as to what it means to be Zoroastrian and follow the teachings of Zarathustra. Yet despite the fact that many who claim to believe in Zarathustra have been polluted they forget that the faiths/religions of the World all have been influenced by Zarathustra. With two heretical spoofs of Zoroastrianism, Christianity and Islam, fighting it out and Iranians around the world suffering now is a perfect time to revive the pure faith of Zarathustra.
There are two ways to define what a Zoroastrian/Zarathustri is. The first is to define it by what is is, i.e. the faith of Zarathustra comprised of those who follow and believe in the teachings of Zarathustra. The second is to define it by what it is not. It is not a faith of Aryan/white supremacists which Nietzsche promogulated. It is not a magical cult as some fiction writers would have people believe.. It is not some namby-pamby hippie faith as many who have met with the parsis have assumed, or those who are obsessed with fagass freddie mercury, who had done much during his lifetime to malign his heritage, assume.
The parsis and freddie mercury are excellent places to start with when defining what Zorostrianism is not. In fagass freddie’s case if he were really a Zoroastrian he never would have engaged in homosexual intercourse, as it is strictly forbidden for all Zoroastrians. The parsis, the descendants of Zoroastrians who fled the Muslim invasion of Iran in the 7th century and who mostly settled in what is now India, have allowed the practices of Zarathustra to be corrupted. For instance, most of them practice veganism, which is alien to the teachings of Zarathustra and was adopted by contact with Hindus. The same is similarly true for the navjote ceremony, which was influenced by contact with Judaism and Hinduism. Though Zoroastrian teachings have influenced Judaism, such as kashrut dietary law which is based on Zoroastrian nasau dietary laws and the refusal to encourage converts, the jewish bar/bat mitzvah helped to form the navjote, whereas contact with hindus and their upanayana ceremony helped to cement the practice among parsis. As stated above a Zoroastrian is one who follows and believes in the teachings of Zarathustra. Throughout history as Iran expanded along with Iranian civilization and culture spread the teachings of Zarathustra travelled with it as well. Along with successes many failures and catastrophes occurred, diluting the Iranian community abroad and causing many to abandon the faith. As many have chose to return to the pure faith of Zarathustra such ceremonies are superfluous.
The texts of Zoroastrian faith, the Avesta, Yasna, Gathas, etc, while they are true documents, only now exist in written form because of the threat Christianity posed because of their use of the bible. Up to that point the teachings of Zaratustra were transmitted orally, with those lying killed. As Christians used this against Zoroastrians, claiming their faith was false because it was orally transmitted, the teachings of Zarathustra were written down in the third century by a Zoroastrian ratu named Tansar. Here I use the title ratu instead of mobed, for the title mobed came about in the third century when Tansar helped establish Zoroastrianism’s power base as the state religion of Iran when Ardashir came to power as Shahanshah in 224. Up until that point Zoroastrianism never had any hierarchy, simply was a community of believers of the faith with no hierarchical structure, and the title mobed was based on the priests of Judaism. Therefore anyone who claims to be a mobed is not a proper Zoroastrian. Just as controversial is the method of prayer.. While Zoroastrians must pray five times a day in front of fire many can’t decide whether to do the Kusti prayers or to recite Ahunavar, the greatest prayer and act of devotion. As the Ahunavar is the greatest prayer reciting it five times daily before fire is proper. The kusti, while taught by Zarathustra, is superfluous, as there are times when one does not have access to a kusti.
Many ask can Zoroastrianism be revived today, and I say yes. The biggest impediment is the laziness of people to take a hard look at the teachings of Zarathustra and to apply them to their lives, thus becoming a proper Zoroastrian. Consider how both Christianity and islam copy off of Zoroastrianism. In the case of Christianity they mention in the Gospel how the three “wise men”, who were Zoroastrian ratu visited jesus at his birth, as they predicted he would be born, calling him Ushedar, the first world savior who would be born 1,000 years after the birth of Zarathustra and who would fail in his work. The teaching of the unforgivable sin of denying one the right to pray mentioned in the Gospel is Zoroastrian in origin, the Christian wedding vows are of Zoroastrian in origin, the catholic concept of purgatory comes from the Zoroastrian Hammigistan, the protestant belief in a community of believers is also Zoroastrian in practice. Yet mainstream Christianity continues to ignore and marginalize Zoroastrians. Islam copies off of Zoroastrianism most of all. The five daily prayers are Zoroastrian, the Halal dietary laws are Zoroastrian in origin, and the concept of Jihad is Zoroastrian in origin, just to name the most obvious. Even many Muslims have considered Zoroastrianism a sect of Islam, which though false has allowed Muslims to minister to Zoroastrians in prisons where often Zoroastrian worship is forbidden. Therefore Zoroastrian concepts are familiar, the only thing left is to apply them more vigorously to allow people to revert or convert.
Consider the benefits of the Zoroastrian way. For one if a mass reversion occurred in Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries once under Iranian rule the horrors of sharia law would disappear, such as cutting off hands for stealing a loaf of bread, or honor killings of unmarried couples having sexual relations or killings of people who use alcohol, as Zoroastrian teachings do not condone this, yet those who complain about sharia law do not even examine Zoroastrianism as an alternative or encourage reversion. The horrors of pedophile priests in Christianity, notable demonstrated in the catholic church but which have also occurred in Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist, and other sects, and other Christian and muslim abuses of clerical authority would never have occurred had there been mass reversion and had Zoroastrianism remained a force.
It would be very easy to put the teachings of Zarathustra into practice today and revive the Pure faith he taught. The real question is what are we willing to do to put it into use?
There are two ways to define what a Zoroastrian/Zarathustri is. The first is to define it by what is is, i.e. the faith of Zarathustra comprised of those who follow and believe in the teachings of Zarathustra. The second is to define it by what it is not. It is not a faith of Aryan/white supremacists which Nietzsche promogulated. It is not a magical cult as some fiction writers would have people believe.. It is not some namby-pamby hippie faith as many who have met with the parsis have assumed, or those who are obsessed with fagass freddie mercury, who had done much during his lifetime to malign his heritage, assume.
The parsis and freddie mercury are excellent places to start with when defining what Zorostrianism is not. In fagass freddie’s case if he were really a Zoroastrian he never would have engaged in homosexual intercourse, as it is strictly forbidden for all Zoroastrians. The parsis, the descendants of Zoroastrians who fled the Muslim invasion of Iran in the 7th century and who mostly settled in what is now India, have allowed the practices of Zarathustra to be corrupted. For instance, most of them practice veganism, which is alien to the teachings of Zarathustra and was adopted by contact with Hindus. The same is similarly true for the navjote ceremony, which was influenced by contact with Judaism and Hinduism. Though Zoroastrian teachings have influenced Judaism, such as kashrut dietary law which is based on Zoroastrian nasau dietary laws and the refusal to encourage converts, the jewish bar/bat mitzvah helped to form the navjote, whereas contact with hindus and their upanayana ceremony helped to cement the practice among parsis. As stated above a Zoroastrian is one who follows and believes in the teachings of Zarathustra. Throughout history as Iran expanded along with Iranian civilization and culture spread the teachings of Zarathustra travelled with it as well. Along with successes many failures and catastrophes occurred, diluting the Iranian community abroad and causing many to abandon the faith. As many have chose to return to the pure faith of Zarathustra such ceremonies are superfluous.
The texts of Zoroastrian faith, the Avesta, Yasna, Gathas, etc, while they are true documents, only now exist in written form because of the threat Christianity posed because of their use of the bible. Up to that point the teachings of Zaratustra were transmitted orally, with those lying killed. As Christians used this against Zoroastrians, claiming their faith was false because it was orally transmitted, the teachings of Zarathustra were written down in the third century by a Zoroastrian ratu named Tansar. Here I use the title ratu instead of mobed, for the title mobed came about in the third century when Tansar helped establish Zoroastrianism’s power base as the state religion of Iran when Ardashir came to power as Shahanshah in 224. Up until that point Zoroastrianism never had any hierarchy, simply was a community of believers of the faith with no hierarchical structure, and the title mobed was based on the priests of Judaism. Therefore anyone who claims to be a mobed is not a proper Zoroastrian. Just as controversial is the method of prayer.. While Zoroastrians must pray five times a day in front of fire many can’t decide whether to do the Kusti prayers or to recite Ahunavar, the greatest prayer and act of devotion. As the Ahunavar is the greatest prayer reciting it five times daily before fire is proper. The kusti, while taught by Zarathustra, is superfluous, as there are times when one does not have access to a kusti.
Many ask can Zoroastrianism be revived today, and I say yes. The biggest impediment is the laziness of people to take a hard look at the teachings of Zarathustra and to apply them to their lives, thus becoming a proper Zoroastrian. Consider how both Christianity and islam copy off of Zoroastrianism. In the case of Christianity they mention in the Gospel how the three “wise men”, who were Zoroastrian ratu visited jesus at his birth, as they predicted he would be born, calling him Ushedar, the first world savior who would be born 1,000 years after the birth of Zarathustra and who would fail in his work. The teaching of the unforgivable sin of denying one the right to pray mentioned in the Gospel is Zoroastrian in origin, the Christian wedding vows are of Zoroastrian in origin, the catholic concept of purgatory comes from the Zoroastrian Hammigistan, the protestant belief in a community of believers is also Zoroastrian in practice. Yet mainstream Christianity continues to ignore and marginalize Zoroastrians. Islam copies off of Zoroastrianism most of all. The five daily prayers are Zoroastrian, the Halal dietary laws are Zoroastrian in origin, and the concept of Jihad is Zoroastrian in origin, just to name the most obvious. Even many Muslims have considered Zoroastrianism a sect of Islam, which though false has allowed Muslims to minister to Zoroastrians in prisons where often Zoroastrian worship is forbidden. Therefore Zoroastrian concepts are familiar, the only thing left is to apply them more vigorously to allow people to revert or convert.
Consider the benefits of the Zoroastrian way. For one if a mass reversion occurred in Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries once under Iranian rule the horrors of sharia law would disappear, such as cutting off hands for stealing a loaf of bread, or honor killings of unmarried couples having sexual relations or killings of people who use alcohol, as Zoroastrian teachings do not condone this, yet those who complain about sharia law do not even examine Zoroastrianism as an alternative or encourage reversion. The horrors of pedophile priests in Christianity, notable demonstrated in the catholic church but which have also occurred in Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist, and other sects, and other Christian and muslim abuses of clerical authority would never have occurred had there been mass reversion and had Zoroastrianism remained a force.
It would be very easy to put the teachings of Zarathustra into practice today and revive the Pure faith he taught. The real question is what are we willing to do to put it into use?
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Seeing the facts about Iran’s recent problems
Those who are able to see straight are able to see that the recent troubles Iran has experienced since June 2009 are not those of a freedom or human rights movement, rather one that’s aim is to destabilize Iran in preparation for an invasion, and failing that weaken Iran where it can not play a major role in World affairs. There are some that think that when people say this they are crazy, however those people are stupid and uninformed, and need to look at the facts harder. Here I will present the basics behind the facts.
Those that say that this is a human rights movement need to ask themselves some important questions. First, if human rights has been a long standing issue then why have there not been riots for years in Iran? If conditions are as bad as are claimed then Iran’s population would never have tolerated it for any length of time. Plus amnesty international and other groups which report on human rights have not always reported the truth about Iranian “atrocity” stories or Iranian affairs. They do not mention facts like how honor killings and other female abuse stories are confined only to Iran’s practicing muslim population, or how branches of groups like the Persian cultural foundation are nonexistent. Then again seeing how that amnesty international has recently been packed by Iranians who spew such lies it is not surprising, yet all the same it is disgusting and disgraceful. If you question my reasoning consider this. Many of these same Iranians have been long opponents of war with America and Israel, though many of them have avoided taking any direct action and instead relied on the actions of others. Second, most Iranian groups were shut down and harassed as political groups because they did not spew the negative image that many in gpvernment and positions of power in the west have of Iran and Iranians. Along comes these uprisings in Iran under the guise of the green movement and all of a sudden those who support the green movement do not face negative stigma, as if to personify hajji baba for the 21st century.
The argument that it is a freedom movement fails when one asks, like above, why there were no mass uprisings before the June 2009 elections? Furthermore consider the uprisings were backed and instigated by politicians inside and outside of Iran who have had connections with the cia and the council on foreign relations. People forget that mousavi was a long time crony of khomeini, and we need not go into detail about the backing the cia gave khomeini during the revolution. The same is true for rafsanjani and mohammed forouzandeh, two people who have helped shape the image of Iran as a nightmare state the way Milosevic did for Yugoslavia, cronies all yet falsely portrayed as freedom fighters. It should be no coincidence that mousavi’s cousin is CinC of Iran’s Air Force, in other words in a position where he could effect Iran’s safety in the event of an invasion the same way members of Iraq’s military betrayed Saddam Hussein in 2003. Nor should we forget how reza pahlavi and farah diba pahlavi have come out in support of the green movement, tarnishing any legitimacy they have to their claim as iran’s deposed ruling house and tarnishing Royalists and Monarchists, not to mention iran’s aristocratic families who can trace their ancestry to Iran’s previous ruling houses.
Even were the masses of Iranians not direct collaborators of the cia and cfr they certainly have been influenced by their works. Since the 1990’s the majority of Iranians who have travelled to America and the west have done so as students. Those students who prosper do so not so much by good grades but by debasing their heritage and going along with every negative stereotype of Iranians the west creates. This group is isolated from Iranians who travelled to the west before the revolution socially, except for immediate family, and tends to take high paying jobs and to piss cash on useless luxuries, exemplifying the worst stereotypes of westerners. Furthermore, they have not taken a serious interest in other groups who have been disenfranchised and victimized by American and western actions. Rather once they achieve wealth and material possessions they fell they are successful and care about nobody else. This attitude has cost the green movement the support of the very activist groups who assisted the Iranian community in preventing an invasion.
Those who can’t look at the facts are doomed to fail. One of the greatest problems with Iranian civilization is that when things get tough most Iranians choose to escape into the world of excuses rather than face harsh reality. This is what is happening again and we need to wake up, face harsh reality, and get ourselves together or face extinction.
Those that say that this is a human rights movement need to ask themselves some important questions. First, if human rights has been a long standing issue then why have there not been riots for years in Iran? If conditions are as bad as are claimed then Iran’s population would never have tolerated it for any length of time. Plus amnesty international and other groups which report on human rights have not always reported the truth about Iranian “atrocity” stories or Iranian affairs. They do not mention facts like how honor killings and other female abuse stories are confined only to Iran’s practicing muslim population, or how branches of groups like the Persian cultural foundation are nonexistent. Then again seeing how that amnesty international has recently been packed by Iranians who spew such lies it is not surprising, yet all the same it is disgusting and disgraceful. If you question my reasoning consider this. Many of these same Iranians have been long opponents of war with America and Israel, though many of them have avoided taking any direct action and instead relied on the actions of others. Second, most Iranian groups were shut down and harassed as political groups because they did not spew the negative image that many in gpvernment and positions of power in the west have of Iran and Iranians. Along comes these uprisings in Iran under the guise of the green movement and all of a sudden those who support the green movement do not face negative stigma, as if to personify hajji baba for the 21st century.
The argument that it is a freedom movement fails when one asks, like above, why there were no mass uprisings before the June 2009 elections? Furthermore consider the uprisings were backed and instigated by politicians inside and outside of Iran who have had connections with the cia and the council on foreign relations. People forget that mousavi was a long time crony of khomeini, and we need not go into detail about the backing the cia gave khomeini during the revolution. The same is true for rafsanjani and mohammed forouzandeh, two people who have helped shape the image of Iran as a nightmare state the way Milosevic did for Yugoslavia, cronies all yet falsely portrayed as freedom fighters. It should be no coincidence that mousavi’s cousin is CinC of Iran’s Air Force, in other words in a position where he could effect Iran’s safety in the event of an invasion the same way members of Iraq’s military betrayed Saddam Hussein in 2003. Nor should we forget how reza pahlavi and farah diba pahlavi have come out in support of the green movement, tarnishing any legitimacy they have to their claim as iran’s deposed ruling house and tarnishing Royalists and Monarchists, not to mention iran’s aristocratic families who can trace their ancestry to Iran’s previous ruling houses.
Even were the masses of Iranians not direct collaborators of the cia and cfr they certainly have been influenced by their works. Since the 1990’s the majority of Iranians who have travelled to America and the west have done so as students. Those students who prosper do so not so much by good grades but by debasing their heritage and going along with every negative stereotype of Iranians the west creates. This group is isolated from Iranians who travelled to the west before the revolution socially, except for immediate family, and tends to take high paying jobs and to piss cash on useless luxuries, exemplifying the worst stereotypes of westerners. Furthermore, they have not taken a serious interest in other groups who have been disenfranchised and victimized by American and western actions. Rather once they achieve wealth and material possessions they fell they are successful and care about nobody else. This attitude has cost the green movement the support of the very activist groups who assisted the Iranian community in preventing an invasion.
Those who can’t look at the facts are doomed to fail. One of the greatest problems with Iranian civilization is that when things get tough most Iranians choose to escape into the world of excuses rather than face harsh reality. This is what is happening again and we need to wake up, face harsh reality, and get ourselves together or face extinction.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Zendran inheritance/legal situation update
I just met with the rhode island state police this morning about the
criminal complaint I filed against washington trust. They told me that
after reviewing my complaint they can not determine how to proceed in my
case and can not determine if a crime has been comitted for lack of
further evidence. This means at this time my case is at a standstill.
This news comes weeks after pica accepted a $10,000 donation from
washington trust, which the pastor of first universalist church told me
was used to open up a new food pantry in his church. Most disconcerting
is that
1. The pastor of first universalist church, along with Pastor Ivins of
First Baptist Church in america and Reverend Almond of Matthewson St.
Methodist church who are also pica members agreed NOT to accept
donations from washington trust because of the court's ruling in my
favor two years ago in my successful defense against washington trust.
2. The only tv news station to cover the story was wjar, who had mario
hillario cover the story, adding insult to injury. The link to the
video of that story is below
http://www2.turnto10.com/jar/news/local/article/local_food_pantry_expands/27593/
Essentially a news station that hates my guts decided to have a crack at
this.
The crooked dealings of wjar have continued as well. Recently bill
simons, who sits on the board of providence public library with wjar
president lisa churchville, has become an adjunct faculty at the watson
institute. This from someone who has no expertise in foreign affairs at
a facility which I put into prominence. Also recently betty jo cugini
was dropped from wjar, her being the daughter of the former head of
westerly community credit union, that bank figuring prominently in my
inheritance dispute.
All in all, not good news.
Peter Z
criminal complaint I filed against washington trust. They told me that
after reviewing my complaint they can not determine how to proceed in my
case and can not determine if a crime has been comitted for lack of
further evidence. This means at this time my case is at a standstill.
This news comes weeks after pica accepted a $10,000 donation from
washington trust, which the pastor of first universalist church told me
was used to open up a new food pantry in his church. Most disconcerting
is that
1. The pastor of first universalist church, along with Pastor Ivins of
First Baptist Church in america and Reverend Almond of Matthewson St.
Methodist church who are also pica members agreed NOT to accept
donations from washington trust because of the court's ruling in my
favor two years ago in my successful defense against washington trust.
2. The only tv news station to cover the story was wjar, who had mario
hillario cover the story, adding insult to injury. The link to the
video of that story is below
http://www2.turnto10.com/jar/news/local/article/local_food_pantry_expands/27593/
Essentially a news station that hates my guts decided to have a crack at
this.
The crooked dealings of wjar have continued as well. Recently bill
simons, who sits on the board of providence public library with wjar
president lisa churchville, has become an adjunct faculty at the watson
institute. This from someone who has no expertise in foreign affairs at
a facility which I put into prominence. Also recently betty jo cugini
was dropped from wjar, her being the daughter of the former head of
westerly community credit union, that bank figuring prominently in my
inheritance dispute.
All in all, not good news.
Peter Z
Saturday, December 19, 2009
New Iranian warships influenced by Zendran
I saw this in Fars News recently. Compare the 2009 article below with
what I wrote in December 2008. Here is the link to what I wrote then
http://peterkhanzendran.blogspot.com/search?q=Iranian+naval+design
And below is what fars news wrote this year.
Peter Khan Zendran
News number: 8801210727 19:25 | 2009-04-10
Defence
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iran to Manufacture Giant Destroyer, Advanced Submarines
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran plans to manufacture the largest destroyer and the
most advanced submarines in the region, a senior Iranian commander said
on Friday, adding that the army is also due to start mass production of
new series of fighter jets in the current year.
"The Iranian nation will observe that we will manufacture the largest
destroyer and the most advanced submarines in the region," Commander of
the Iranian Army Major General Ataollah Salehi told FNA.
"Mass production of fighter jets, the samples of which were unveiled
last year, and plans to manufacture vessels and submarines will be on
our agenda in the new (Iranian) year (started 20 March)," Salehi said,
stressing that the country is seeking to repeat the major advancements
made in the last year, including the launch of first home made Iranian
satellite 'Omid', in the current year.
Earlier in February Iranian Deputy Defense Minister General Ahmad Vahidi
said that Iran will produce more modern military planes after its
success in building 'Saeqeh' (Thunderbolt) and 'Azarakhsh' (Lightening)
fighter jets.
"We have built some fighter jets, including Azarakhsh and Saeqeh, in our
country that could fly and it is natural that we won't stop and will
take the necessary steps for their development," Vahidi said.
Saeqeh, a joint product of the Iranian Air Force and the Defense
Ministry, went on display as part of the Iranian air force's fleet
during military parades on the Army Day last year.
Vahidi also announced that Iran has produced spy planes with the flying
range of 1,000 km.
what I wrote in December 2008. Here is the link to what I wrote then
http://peterkhanzendran.blogspot.com/search?q=Iranian+naval+design
And below is what fars news wrote this year.
Peter Khan Zendran
News number: 8801210727 19:25 | 2009-04-10
Defence
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iran to Manufacture Giant Destroyer, Advanced Submarines
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran plans to manufacture the largest destroyer and the
most advanced submarines in the region, a senior Iranian commander said
on Friday, adding that the army is also due to start mass production of
new series of fighter jets in the current year.
"The Iranian nation will observe that we will manufacture the largest
destroyer and the most advanced submarines in the region," Commander of
the Iranian Army Major General Ataollah Salehi told FNA.
"Mass production of fighter jets, the samples of which were unveiled
last year, and plans to manufacture vessels and submarines will be on
our agenda in the new (Iranian) year (started 20 March)," Salehi said,
stressing that the country is seeking to repeat the major advancements
made in the last year, including the launch of first home made Iranian
satellite 'Omid', in the current year.
Earlier in February Iranian Deputy Defense Minister General Ahmad Vahidi
said that Iran will produce more modern military planes after its
success in building 'Saeqeh' (Thunderbolt) and 'Azarakhsh' (Lightening)
fighter jets.
"We have built some fighter jets, including Azarakhsh and Saeqeh, in our
country that could fly and it is natural that we won't stop and will
take the necessary steps for their development," Vahidi said.
Saeqeh, a joint product of the Iranian Air Force and the Defense
Ministry, went on display as part of the Iranian air force's fleet
during military parades on the Army Day last year.
Vahidi also announced that Iran has produced spy planes with the flying
range of 1,000 km.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Saint nuke for xmas?
Who would have thought a Ballistic Missile Sub would ever be named after
Santa Claus?
Peter Z
http://russianforces.org/blog/2009/08/project_955_saint_nicholas.shtml
Project 955 Saint Nicholas
According to the general director of Sevmash, Nikolai Kalistratov, the
new strategic ballistic missile submarine of the Project 955 Borey class
will be named after one of the most revered saints in the Russian
Orthodox Church - St. Nicholas (who is known as the model for Santa
Claus, although this connection is almost nonexistent in the Russian
Orthodox tradition). Kalistratov said this during a Patriarch Kirill's
visit to Sevmash.
Construction of the new submarine is expected to start on December 22,
2009. The lead ship of this class, Yuri Dolgorukiy, began sea trials in
June 2009. Two other submarines - Aleksandr Nevskiy and Vladimir
Monomakh - are under construction.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20091005/156357397.html
Russia to start construction of 4th Borey-class sub in December
MOSCOW, October 5 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's Sevmash shipyard will start
the construction of the fourth Borey class (Project 955) strategic
submarine on December 22, a Sevmash press secretary said Monday.
Anastasia Nikitinskaya said the keel-laying ceremony for an
as-yet-unnamed sub was timed to coincide with the shipyard's 70th
anniversary.
She said Russia's newest Borey class strategic nuclear submarine, the
Yury Dolgoruky, had undergone three sea trials out of the required six.
The Yury Dolgoruky, which is expected to be armed with the new Bulava
sea-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM), successfully completed its first
round of sea trials in the White Sea on July 10.
The vessel is 170 meters (580 feet) long, has a hull diameter of 13
meters (42 feet), a crew of 107, including 55 officers, a maximum depth
of 450 meters (about 1,500 feet) and a submerged speed of about 29
knots. It can carry up to 16 ballistic missiles and torpedoes.
The construction cost of the submarine totaled 23 billion rubles (about
$713 mln), including 9 billion rubles ($280 mln) for research and
development.
Two other Borey class nuclear submarines, the Alexander Nevsky and the
Vladimir Monomakh, are in different stages of completion. Russia is
planning to build eight of these subs by 2015.
According to Navy officials, fourth-generation Borey class
nuclear-powered submarines will form the core of Russia's modern
strategic submarine fleet, and will be deployed with Russia's Northern
and Pacific fleets.
However, the submarine's commissioning into the Navy could be delayed by
setbacks in the development of the troubled Bulava missile, which has
officially suffered six failures in 12 tests.
However, some analysts suggest that in reality the number of failures
was considerably larger. For example, according to Russian military
expert Pavel Felgenhauer, of the Bulava's 12 test launches, only one was
quite successful.
The future development of the Bulava has been questioned by some
lawmakers and defense industry officials, who have suggested that all
efforts should be focused on the existing Sineva SLBM.
But the Russian military has insisted that there is no alternative to
the Bulava and pledged to continue testing the missile until it is ready
to be put in service with the Navy.
Santa Claus?
Peter Z
http://russianforces.org/blog/2009/08/project_955_saint_nicholas.shtml
Project 955 Saint Nicholas
According to the general director of Sevmash, Nikolai Kalistratov, the
new strategic ballistic missile submarine of the Project 955 Borey class
will be named after one of the most revered saints in the Russian
Orthodox Church - St. Nicholas (who is known as the model for Santa
Claus, although this connection is almost nonexistent in the Russian
Orthodox tradition). Kalistratov said this during a Patriarch Kirill's
visit to Sevmash.
Construction of the new submarine is expected to start on December 22,
2009. The lead ship of this class, Yuri Dolgorukiy, began sea trials in
June 2009. Two other submarines - Aleksandr Nevskiy and Vladimir
Monomakh - are under construction.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20091005/156357397.html
Russia to start construction of 4th Borey-class sub in December
MOSCOW, October 5 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's Sevmash shipyard will start
the construction of the fourth Borey class (Project 955) strategic
submarine on December 22, a Sevmash press secretary said Monday.
Anastasia Nikitinskaya said the keel-laying ceremony for an
as-yet-unnamed sub was timed to coincide with the shipyard's 70th
anniversary.
She said Russia's newest Borey class strategic nuclear submarine, the
Yury Dolgoruky, had undergone three sea trials out of the required six.
The Yury Dolgoruky, which is expected to be armed with the new Bulava
sea-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM), successfully completed its first
round of sea trials in the White Sea on July 10.
The vessel is 170 meters (580 feet) long, has a hull diameter of 13
meters (42 feet), a crew of 107, including 55 officers, a maximum depth
of 450 meters (about 1,500 feet) and a submerged speed of about 29
knots. It can carry up to 16 ballistic missiles and torpedoes.
The construction cost of the submarine totaled 23 billion rubles (about
$713 mln), including 9 billion rubles ($280 mln) for research and
development.
Two other Borey class nuclear submarines, the Alexander Nevsky and the
Vladimir Monomakh, are in different stages of completion. Russia is
planning to build eight of these subs by 2015.
According to Navy officials, fourth-generation Borey class
nuclear-powered submarines will form the core of Russia's modern
strategic submarine fleet, and will be deployed with Russia's Northern
and Pacific fleets.
However, the submarine's commissioning into the Navy could be delayed by
setbacks in the development of the troubled Bulava missile, which has
officially suffered six failures in 12 tests.
However, some analysts suggest that in reality the number of failures
was considerably larger. For example, according to Russian military
expert Pavel Felgenhauer, of the Bulava's 12 test launches, only one was
quite successful.
The future development of the Bulava has been questioned by some
lawmakers and defense industry officials, who have suggested that all
efforts should be focused on the existing Sineva SLBM.
But the Russian military has insisted that there is no alternative to
the Bulava and pledged to continue testing the missile until it is ready
to be put in service with the Navy.
Friday, November 13, 2009
Move to seize alavi foundation assets in amrika
What many do not realize is that reza pahlavi and shahbanou farah are
involved in the transactions of the alavi foundation, that the alavi
foundation is essentially the world's largest slush fund, and that
profits from this slush funds not only go to hezbollah and hamas but to
pay the difference for Iranians who recieve welfare and other social
assistance benefits in america. Notice the timing of this as america is
considering military action in and around Iran, when more of the
american backed suskimargi from the green movement are acting out again,
and when congress is considering how to fund health care and other
programs.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
WDSU.com
Related To Story
AP Photo
The Islamic Education Center in Potomac, Md. on Nov. 12, 2009. The
center rents this building from the Alavi Foundation, which owns the
building but does not run the center.
US Seeks To Seize 4 Mosques, Tower Linked To Iran
Prosecutors Seek Forfeiture Of More Than $500M In Assets
ADAM GOLDMAN, Associated Press Writer
POSTED: 3:59 pm CST November 12, 2009
UPDATED: 7:26 am CST November 13, 2009
NEW YORK -- In what could be one of the biggest counterterrorism
seizures in U.S. history, federal prosecutors sought to take over four
U.S. mosques and a New York City skyscraper owned by a Muslim
organization suspected of being controlled by the Iranian government.
Prosecutors on Thursday filed a civil complaint in federal court against
the Alavi Foundation, seeking the forfeiture of more than $500 million
in assets.
The assets include bank accounts; Islamic centers consisting of schools
and mosques in New York, Maryland, California and Houston; more than 100
acres in Virginia; and a 36-story Manhattan office tower. Confiscating
the properties would be a sharp blow against Iran, which the U.S.
government has accused of bankrolling terrorism and trying to build a
nuclear bomb.
A telephone call and e-mail to Iran's U.N. Mission seeking comment were
not immediately answered.
John D. Winter, the Alavi Foundation's lawyer, said it intends to
litigate the case and prevail. He said the foundation has been
cooperating with the government's investigation for the better part of a
year.
"Obviously the foundation is disappointed that the government has
decided to bring this action," Winter told The Associated Press.
It is extremely rare for U.S. law enforcement authorities to seize a
house of worship, a step fraught with questions about the First
Amendment right to freedom of religion.
The action against the Shiite Muslim mosques is sure to inflame
relations between the U.S. government and American Muslims, many of whom
fear a backlash after last week's Fort Hood shooting rampage, blamed on
a Muslim American major.
"Whatever the details of the government's case against the owners of the
mosques, as a civil rights organization we are concerned that the
seizure of American houses of worship could have a chilling effect on
the religious freedom of citizens of all faiths and may send a negative
message to Muslims worldwide," said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the
Council on American-Islamic Relations.
It is unclear what will happen to the properties if the government
ultimately prevails. But the government typically sells properties it
seizes through forfeiture and sometimes distributes the money to crime
victims.
U.S. attorney's office spokeswoman Yusill Scribner said there are no
allegations of any wrongdoing on the part of the tenants or occupants of
the properties, which will remain open.
Prosecutors said the Alavi Foundation managed the office tower on behalf
of the Iranian government and, working with a front company known as
Assa Corp., illegally funneled millions in rental income to Iran's
state-owned Bank Melli. A U.S. Treasury official has accused Bank Melli
of providing support for Iran's nuclear program, and it is illegal in
the United States to do business with the bank.
U.S. officials have long suspected the foundation was an arm of the
Iranian government. A 97-page complaint details involvement in
foundation business by several top Iranian officials, including the
deputy prime minister and ambassadors to the United Nations.
"For two decades, the Alavi Foundation's affairs have been directed by
various Iranian officials, including Iranian ambassadors to the United
Nations, in violation of a series of American laws," U.S. Attorney Preet
Bharara said in a statement.
There were no raids as part of the forfeiture action Thursday. The
government is simply required to post notices of the civil complaint on
the properties.
As prosecutors outlined their allegations against Alavi, the Islamic
centers and the schools they run carried on with normal activity. The
mosques' leaders had no immediate comment.
Parents lined up in their cars to pick up their children at the schools
within the Islamic Education Center of Greater Houston and the Islamic
Education Center in Rockville, Md. No notices of the forfeiture action
were posted at either place as of late Thursday.
At the Islamic Institute of New York, a mosque and school in Queens, two
U.S. marshals rang a doorbell repeatedly, taped a forfeiture notice to
the window and left a large document on the ground. A group of men came
out and took the document after the marshals left.
The fourth Islamic center marked for seizure is in Carmichael, Calif.
The skyscraper, known as the Piaget building, was erected in the 1970s
under the shah of Iran, who was overthrown in 1979. Tenants include law
and investment firms and other businesses.
The building, last valued in 2007 at $570 million to $650 million, has
been an important source of income for the foundation over the past 36
years. Tax records show the foundation earned $4.5 million from rents in
2007. That money helps fund the centers and other ventures, such as
sending educational literature to imprisoned Muslims in the U.S. The
foundation also has invested in dozens of mosques around the country and
supported Iranian academics at prominent universities.
If prosecutors seize the skyscraper, the foundation would have almost no
way to continue supporting the Islamic centers, which house schools and
mosques. That could leave a major void in Shiite communities, and hard
feelings toward the FBI, which played a big role in the investigation.
The forfeiture action comes at a tense moment in U.S.-Iranian relations,
with the two sides at odds over Iran's nuclear program and its arrest of
three American hikers.
But Michael Rubin, an expert on Iran at the American Enterprise
Institute, said the timing was probably coincidental and not an effort
to influence Iran on those issues.
"Suspicion about the Alavi Foundation transcends three administrations,"
Rubin said. "It's taken ages dealing with the nuts and bolts of the
investigation. It's not the type of investigation which is part of any
larger strategy."
Legal scholars said they know of only a few previous cases in which law
enforcement authorities have seized a house of worship. Marc Stern, a
religious-liberty expert with the American Jewish Congress, called such
cases extremely rare.
The Alavi Foundation is the successor organization to the Pahlavi
Foundation, a nonprofit group the shah used to advance Iran's charitable
interests in America. But authorities said its agenda changed after the
fall of the shah.
In 2007, the United States accused Bank Melli of providing services to
Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs and put the bank on its
list of companies whose assets must be frozen. Washington has imposed
sanctions against various other Iranian businesses.
___
Associated Press writers Samantha Gross in New York City, Juan A. Lozano
in Houston, investigative researcher Randy Herschaft in New York City
and AP photographer Jacquelyn Martin in Maryland contributed to this
report.
Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
involved in the transactions of the alavi foundation, that the alavi
foundation is essentially the world's largest slush fund, and that
profits from this slush funds not only go to hezbollah and hamas but to
pay the difference for Iranians who recieve welfare and other social
assistance benefits in america. Notice the timing of this as america is
considering military action in and around Iran, when more of the
american backed suskimargi from the green movement are acting out again,
and when congress is considering how to fund health care and other
programs.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
WDSU.com
Related To Story
AP Photo
The Islamic Education Center in Potomac, Md. on Nov. 12, 2009. The
center rents this building from the Alavi Foundation, which owns the
building but does not run the center.
US Seeks To Seize 4 Mosques, Tower Linked To Iran
Prosecutors Seek Forfeiture Of More Than $500M In Assets
ADAM GOLDMAN, Associated Press Writer
POSTED: 3:59 pm CST November 12, 2009
UPDATED: 7:26 am CST November 13, 2009
NEW YORK -- In what could be one of the biggest counterterrorism
seizures in U.S. history, federal prosecutors sought to take over four
U.S. mosques and a New York City skyscraper owned by a Muslim
organization suspected of being controlled by the Iranian government.
Prosecutors on Thursday filed a civil complaint in federal court against
the Alavi Foundation, seeking the forfeiture of more than $500 million
in assets.
The assets include bank accounts; Islamic centers consisting of schools
and mosques in New York, Maryland, California and Houston; more than 100
acres in Virginia; and a 36-story Manhattan office tower. Confiscating
the properties would be a sharp blow against Iran, which the U.S.
government has accused of bankrolling terrorism and trying to build a
nuclear bomb.
A telephone call and e-mail to Iran's U.N. Mission seeking comment were
not immediately answered.
John D. Winter, the Alavi Foundation's lawyer, said it intends to
litigate the case and prevail. He said the foundation has been
cooperating with the government's investigation for the better part of a
year.
"Obviously the foundation is disappointed that the government has
decided to bring this action," Winter told The Associated Press.
It is extremely rare for U.S. law enforcement authorities to seize a
house of worship, a step fraught with questions about the First
Amendment right to freedom of religion.
The action against the Shiite Muslim mosques is sure to inflame
relations between the U.S. government and American Muslims, many of whom
fear a backlash after last week's Fort Hood shooting rampage, blamed on
a Muslim American major.
"Whatever the details of the government's case against the owners of the
mosques, as a civil rights organization we are concerned that the
seizure of American houses of worship could have a chilling effect on
the religious freedom of citizens of all faiths and may send a negative
message to Muslims worldwide," said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the
Council on American-Islamic Relations.
It is unclear what will happen to the properties if the government
ultimately prevails. But the government typically sells properties it
seizes through forfeiture and sometimes distributes the money to crime
victims.
U.S. attorney's office spokeswoman Yusill Scribner said there are no
allegations of any wrongdoing on the part of the tenants or occupants of
the properties, which will remain open.
Prosecutors said the Alavi Foundation managed the office tower on behalf
of the Iranian government and, working with a front company known as
Assa Corp., illegally funneled millions in rental income to Iran's
state-owned Bank Melli. A U.S. Treasury official has accused Bank Melli
of providing support for Iran's nuclear program, and it is illegal in
the United States to do business with the bank.
U.S. officials have long suspected the foundation was an arm of the
Iranian government. A 97-page complaint details involvement in
foundation business by several top Iranian officials, including the
deputy prime minister and ambassadors to the United Nations.
"For two decades, the Alavi Foundation's affairs have been directed by
various Iranian officials, including Iranian ambassadors to the United
Nations, in violation of a series of American laws," U.S. Attorney Preet
Bharara said in a statement.
There were no raids as part of the forfeiture action Thursday. The
government is simply required to post notices of the civil complaint on
the properties.
As prosecutors outlined their allegations against Alavi, the Islamic
centers and the schools they run carried on with normal activity. The
mosques' leaders had no immediate comment.
Parents lined up in their cars to pick up their children at the schools
within the Islamic Education Center of Greater Houston and the Islamic
Education Center in Rockville, Md. No notices of the forfeiture action
were posted at either place as of late Thursday.
At the Islamic Institute of New York, a mosque and school in Queens, two
U.S. marshals rang a doorbell repeatedly, taped a forfeiture notice to
the window and left a large document on the ground. A group of men came
out and took the document after the marshals left.
The fourth Islamic center marked for seizure is in Carmichael, Calif.
The skyscraper, known as the Piaget building, was erected in the 1970s
under the shah of Iran, who was overthrown in 1979. Tenants include law
and investment firms and other businesses.
The building, last valued in 2007 at $570 million to $650 million, has
been an important source of income for the foundation over the past 36
years. Tax records show the foundation earned $4.5 million from rents in
2007. That money helps fund the centers and other ventures, such as
sending educational literature to imprisoned Muslims in the U.S. The
foundation also has invested in dozens of mosques around the country and
supported Iranian academics at prominent universities.
If prosecutors seize the skyscraper, the foundation would have almost no
way to continue supporting the Islamic centers, which house schools and
mosques. That could leave a major void in Shiite communities, and hard
feelings toward the FBI, which played a big role in the investigation.
The forfeiture action comes at a tense moment in U.S.-Iranian relations,
with the two sides at odds over Iran's nuclear program and its arrest of
three American hikers.
But Michael Rubin, an expert on Iran at the American Enterprise
Institute, said the timing was probably coincidental and not an effort
to influence Iran on those issues.
"Suspicion about the Alavi Foundation transcends three administrations,"
Rubin said. "It's taken ages dealing with the nuts and bolts of the
investigation. It's not the type of investigation which is part of any
larger strategy."
Legal scholars said they know of only a few previous cases in which law
enforcement authorities have seized a house of worship. Marc Stern, a
religious-liberty expert with the American Jewish Congress, called such
cases extremely rare.
The Alavi Foundation is the successor organization to the Pahlavi
Foundation, a nonprofit group the shah used to advance Iran's charitable
interests in America. But authorities said its agenda changed after the
fall of the shah.
In 2007, the United States accused Bank Melli of providing services to
Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs and put the bank on its
list of companies whose assets must be frozen. Washington has imposed
sanctions against various other Iranian businesses.
___
Associated Press writers Samantha Gross in New York City, Juan A. Lozano
in Houston, investigative researcher Randy Herschaft in New York City
and AP photographer Jacquelyn Martin in Maryland contributed to this
report.
Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Through the eyes of others
Today most people either do not know how or do not want to see things through the perspective of others. By their refusal to do so they only create problems for those around them. Unfortunately, many of those who are able to see from other perspectives are the victims of problems created for them by those around them. Such a person is Major Nidal Malik Hassan.
Too often I hear people whining about those he made trouble for, yet those who whine are those who do nt or will not see things from the other perspective, and thus make trouble for others. Had they learned to see things as Nidal Malik Hassan did they would have seen he and others like him are the real victims.
Here was a man from an ethnic group of people which the government and american population at large have chosen to demonize, as they have to people of various ethnic groups and walks of life throughout the entire history of America. It has only been in recent years that victimized minorities have chosen to fight back against the society and institutions that have victimized them rather than putting up with the abuse or going along to get along. In the case of Major Hassan here was a man who served in the american army like many others, yet who was targeted for harassment and victimization because he is Muslim and an Arab. Like many others he complained about the treatment he received and was ignored and further victimized. Even worse the army decided to materialize the worst fears of Major Hassan by preparing him to fight against his own people in Asia. This was the final insult and led Nidal Malik Hassan to shoot up fort hood.
If people who think this is an isolated incident they must think again. Asan Akbar detonated a live grenade in his commanding officer’s tent after being harassed and victimized for being Muslim and African by those he served with. Throughout the Cold war and especially throughout his Naval career Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, the man who developed nuclear propulsion for Naval vessels, was repeatedly harassed and victimized because he was a Russian, and once he became an Admiral for his breakthrough in Nuclear technology made contact with the Communist leadership in the Kremlin, who offered to make him an Admiral with the same authority he had in the american navy, and all Rickover had to was mention this and give serious consideration to this offer for those who were targeting him to back off. Decisions like this are not easy but the right ones, as I found out by my refusal to accept john chafee’s scholarship to Annapolis in 1996, for as someone who has family from Central Asia, the Middle east, and Eastern Europe I did not want to serve against my own kind for a country which had mistreated my family.
What is really disgusting is to see how members of Nidal Malik Hassan’s community, ie Arabs and Muslims, and those who understand him are dismissed as terrorists, sleeper agents, subversives, enemies of the state, and all other types of demonizations. Those who do the demonizing are those of the lowest kind, those who will stand for any type of abuse and perpetrate it on others just to survive. By their doing so they perpetuate a system that is based on destruction and abuse, and which can only survive by abusing others, and who can not live amongst people without causing harm to all around them. The more people like them are empowered the more people like Nidal Malik Hassan will go off and do what they did, and those that provoke them will be the ones responsible for the ensuing consequences.
Peter Khan Zendran
Too often I hear people whining about those he made trouble for, yet those who whine are those who do nt or will not see things from the other perspective, and thus make trouble for others. Had they learned to see things as Nidal Malik Hassan did they would have seen he and others like him are the real victims.
Here was a man from an ethnic group of people which the government and american population at large have chosen to demonize, as they have to people of various ethnic groups and walks of life throughout the entire history of America. It has only been in recent years that victimized minorities have chosen to fight back against the society and institutions that have victimized them rather than putting up with the abuse or going along to get along. In the case of Major Hassan here was a man who served in the american army like many others, yet who was targeted for harassment and victimization because he is Muslim and an Arab. Like many others he complained about the treatment he received and was ignored and further victimized. Even worse the army decided to materialize the worst fears of Major Hassan by preparing him to fight against his own people in Asia. This was the final insult and led Nidal Malik Hassan to shoot up fort hood.
If people who think this is an isolated incident they must think again. Asan Akbar detonated a live grenade in his commanding officer’s tent after being harassed and victimized for being Muslim and African by those he served with. Throughout the Cold war and especially throughout his Naval career Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, the man who developed nuclear propulsion for Naval vessels, was repeatedly harassed and victimized because he was a Russian, and once he became an Admiral for his breakthrough in Nuclear technology made contact with the Communist leadership in the Kremlin, who offered to make him an Admiral with the same authority he had in the american navy, and all Rickover had to was mention this and give serious consideration to this offer for those who were targeting him to back off. Decisions like this are not easy but the right ones, as I found out by my refusal to accept john chafee’s scholarship to Annapolis in 1996, for as someone who has family from Central Asia, the Middle east, and Eastern Europe I did not want to serve against my own kind for a country which had mistreated my family.
What is really disgusting is to see how members of Nidal Malik Hassan’s community, ie Arabs and Muslims, and those who understand him are dismissed as terrorists, sleeper agents, subversives, enemies of the state, and all other types of demonizations. Those who do the demonizing are those of the lowest kind, those who will stand for any type of abuse and perpetrate it on others just to survive. By their doing so they perpetuate a system that is based on destruction and abuse, and which can only survive by abusing others, and who can not live amongst people without causing harm to all around them. The more people like them are empowered the more people like Nidal Malik Hassan will go off and do what they did, and those that provoke them will be the ones responsible for the ensuing consequences.
Peter Khan Zendran
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Odd convergence in Iranian/Afghan events
Over the past few weeks several odd events have occured in a short time which effect Iran and Afghanistan. They are;
1. The fact that ayatollah ali khameni has been hospatilized, and mousavi and other opposition leaders are reporting him dead. While now the cause of his illness is unknown if he is dead it will spark a succession struggle and possible internal war inside Iran for control, and if he dies because of health problems at this time it will probably be the result of medical murder.
2. Iran in in the midst of aproving drafts on uraniun enrichment, which violate Iran's sovereignity, and any non-compliance can be interpreted as a pretext for invasion, see Iraq.
3. Numerous earthquakes have hit Iran, and with so many happening in a short period of time it is possible they are artifical Bam-style quakes.
4. Afghan president karzai is agreeing to a runof election, after being persuaded by clinton and holbrooke to do so. The presence of those two is important for this and the previous three incidents. I should NOT have to remind people how those 2 destabilized Yugoslavia, or the trouble they made in the 2008 election, or how they failed to get Russia to support sanctions against Iran, so their presence in the region only means one thing, more trouble is planned by them.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
1. The fact that ayatollah ali khameni has been hospatilized, and mousavi and other opposition leaders are reporting him dead. While now the cause of his illness is unknown if he is dead it will spark a succession struggle and possible internal war inside Iran for control, and if he dies because of health problems at this time it will probably be the result of medical murder.
2. Iran in in the midst of aproving drafts on uraniun enrichment, which violate Iran's sovereignity, and any non-compliance can be interpreted as a pretext for invasion, see Iraq.
3. Numerous earthquakes have hit Iran, and with so many happening in a short period of time it is possible they are artifical Bam-style quakes.
4. Afghan president karzai is agreeing to a runof election, after being persuaded by clinton and holbrooke to do so. The presence of those two is important for this and the previous three incidents. I should NOT have to remind people how those 2 destabilized Yugoslavia, or the trouble they made in the 2008 election, or how they failed to get Russia to support sanctions against Iran, so their presence in the region only means one thing, more trouble is planned by them.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)