The Narragansett Runestone deciphered

Despite all the publicity it has received nobody has bothered to do a thorough translation of the Narragansett Runestone, partly because people have overfocused on the authenticity of that Runestone, and those who tried to made glaring errors in translation.  The claim by everett and warren brown that the Narragansett Runestone is their modern creation, though plausible, is certainly not believable.  The two major investigations into that Runestone, by Scott Wolter and by Uppsala University, make glaring errors, the former by overfocusing on one odd rune, the latter by overfocusing on grammar and ignoring the runic names and multiple meanings.  Here I shall clarify this, having studied the Runes in depth and having a strong familiarity with the area the Runestone was found.

To be specific, the Narragansett Runestone has nine Runic images, the first seven are in top of two.  It is the two runes o at the end of the first row and the first rune on the second row that create the controversy.  I shall clarify the meanings of those runes by mentioning their corresponding letter, name, and definition below.

            The first rune is the letter S, has the name Sowilo/Sol, and means Sun

            The second rune is the letter H, has the name Haglaz, and means Hail, either in precipitation or to honor someone.

            The third rune is the letter R, has the name Raido, meaning Raid, as in some journey to acquire something.

            The fourth rune is the letter O, has the names Odal and Opila, and means treasure or landed estate.

            The fifth rune is can mean either the letter Z or S, has the name Algiz, and means to protect.  In many languages and alphabets of Aryan/Iranian origin, including German, Swedish, Danish, Dutch, and English the interchangeability of the letters Z and S is common.

The sixth and seventh runes of the first row are where the controversy begins.  First they appear to either be eroded or poorly carved.  Most assume they are the runic letters L, which has the name Laguz, meaning a lake sized body of water, and that one of them is inverted, or the runic letters I, which has the name Isaz, meaning Ice.  However, they also resemble the Wolfsangel rune, leading to the multiple meaning of the first rune of the second row, which has a tie in with the first rune of the first row.

The Wolfsangel symbolized the hook on which meat was hung in use to trap carnivorous predatory animals, specifically wolves.  It became popular as a mark of heraldry and used in stonework as an early masonic marking, including masonic conflicts in the 15^th century against the aristocracy of the Reich.

It was Scott Wolter who assumed that rune to be the symbol of a secret society from the era when runes were in common usage as an alphabet, and most scholars have wrongly assumed it is the letter a.  While the secret society theory has plausibility, there are three other possibilities.  The first is the abovementioned Wolfsangel.  The second is the letter G, with the name Gebo/Gyfu, meaning a gift.  The third is the Mundilfari rune, which is similar to the Wolfsangel and has the same appearance as the Central Asian and Indigenous American swastika, and it symbolizes raw uncontrollable energy.  In Scandinavian mythology Mundilfari is the deity symbolizing Time, who created Sol, the Sun, and Mani, the Moon. This myth is similar to the Zurvan creation myth which originated in Ecbatana during the Hakhamanish Dynasty in which Zurvan, the Aryan lord of time, creates Dadvah Ahura Mazda, the supreme God, and Angra Mainyu, the lord of evil, thus reinforcing the Aryan heritage of Europe north of the Danube region and Iran, as one should bear in mind the people the Romans referred to as the barbarian Germanic tribes were in fact criminals and other undesirables expelled from the Parthian,and Sassanian Iranian empires.

The final rune is the letter A, has the name Ansuz, and means river, opening, or the Aesir pantheon of Scandinavian deities, specifically Odin.

The mistake many scholars like those at Uppsala made was to focus on the grammatical/letter usage of particular time periods, and ignore the Odin factor, namely the worship of the Norse deity Odin and his being credited with creating the runes and their meanings.  Clearly these runes on the Narragansett Runestone was carved sometime between the first voyage of Leif Erikson, who carved his name in runes on a rock on Nomans land Island nearby, and the voyages of Christopher Columbus.  Whoever carved them was not some modern fake, as they had knowledge of Runes other than the FUTHARK system, and may have been part of a secret society or an Odin worshipper.  Additionally, the Narragansett Runestone has been moved from it’s original location, with it being oddly stolen and recovered with the culprit never disclosed, and with the exact original location unmarked one can not attempt to duplicate a similar item to test the claim by the abovementioned brown brothers.  That the people at the university of rhode island had inconclusive results with their analysis of the Narragansett Runestone is not a surprise, as that campus is a laughingstock which is poorly maintained, yet for a University as prestigious as Uppsala to ignore the multiple meaning of Runes is shocking.  One must also account for the Aryan pride, white supremacist, and secret societies which are active in the area which either venerate such an object, including hiding it for preservative trophy purposes, or who would seek to destroy it.

When one takes into account the multiple meanings of the Runes carved on the Narragansett Runestone into context it tells of a journey overseas regarding some treasure, what this treasure is remains to be determined, but it certainly does not appear to be a fabrication.It’s current problems are more from it’s location, as most of those in the community where it was found have so poorly maintained the area I can say wholeheartedly FUCK RHODE ISLAND.