Sunday, March 27, 2011

More nwo connections to mideast upheavals

Recently I was checking for news from the watson institute when I
stumbled across this event.
http://www.watsoninstitute.org/news_detail.cfm?id=1488
Not only did brown lie as this event was not open to the public but
there were no adds for this event in advance. I did some digging on the
panelists and found there is plenty of dirt on both of them.
In checking shiva balaghi I found she had played a part in inciting the
riots in tahrir square and openly bragged about it on open source radio.
http://www.radioopensource.org/shiva-balaghi-egypt-in-the-spotlight-the-us-on-the-spot/
Additionally, shie is involved with the mer project.
http://www.merip.org/author/shiva-balaghi
Check mer and you will see it is run by chris toensig. Back in 2006
when at the watson institute I confronted toensig about how one of his
authors used info from an article I published on Icke's site in 2003
about katsav and mofaz's Iranian connections and I did not recieve
proper credit for it. The oven stuffer head of the middle east studies
dpt, elliott colla, decided to shoot his mouth off at me, even though
chris admitted I was in the right and the article did not properly quote
it's source, and as a result got in trouble for it.
I also checked on hussein banai and found his website here.
http://www.hussbanai.net/
Not only was he at brown at the same time I was involved with the watson
institute he only got his teaching job once I was no longer at brown.
Not to mention this little hajji baba was one of the ones who refused to
come to my support at all during my legal disputes with brown.
Over all, these are people who are selling out their heritage and have
nobody to blame for their problems but themselves.
Peter Khan Zendran

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Royal pains for the Libyan, Iranian, and other Arab riots

With all the focus on the conflict in the Muslim World people are forgetting some of the key players. In regards to the Libyan situation one key player who has been making a lot of noise is Prince Muhammad, the head of the Senussi dynasty which Qaddafi overthrew in 1969. While Prince Muhammad has been active in attending anti-Qaddafi events in the uk where he lives he has made no effort to return to Libya, in particular to Benghazi where the Senussis are originally from and where his presence could change the situation dramatically.
One other story not being reported is the fact that many of the anti-Qaddafi forces have been attacking ethnic minorities and reporting them as attacks against Qaddafi's forces, I must thank Workers World for bringing this to light where others ignore it, as for once we are in agreement. Interestingly enough they fail to mention that King Abdullah II of Jordan used similar tactics that Qaddafi used initially, that is meeting with political opponents and isolating those inciting riots, yet this is ignored as well.
Speaking of old enemies of mine reza pahlavi has been issuing an open call to attack Iran on his facebok page, but has been too cowardly to put it anywhere else on his site, I have included it here along with other news stories linked here. Apparently with mousavi and karroubi wiped out of action reza pahlavi is showing his true colors and trying to seize control of a faltering movement.
This is just the latest in his bizarre acts. Recently he pulled the facebook page created in memory of Prince Ali-Reza, has been silent about the death of Princess Azadeh, and has not criticized prince william and kate for not rescheduling their wedding, which is occuring on what would have been Prince Ali-Reza's 45th birthday. Right now reza pahlavi has been so obsessed with creating riots that he has forgot how to govern.
Interestingly enough when meeting with hayal alavi earlier this month she admitted that the american government has been behind the riots in Libya, Egypt, and Iran's green movement from the getgo, but the government will not admit it openly.
Speaking of military matters the Algerians have been hitting my Naval Images pages more often. This may seem trivial, but when one considers that Algeria has a sizeable Navy to go with it's military, and that mass riots could erupt there any day like they did in Libya, Egypt, and Yemen one must consider that any potential rioters would want to know what they're up against.
If one doubts this check the links and text below.


http://english.aljazeera.net/video/africa/2011/02/201122416028655869.html
Libya's 'crown prince' makes appeal
Muhammad al-Senussi calls for the international community to help remove Muammar Gaddafi from power.
Last Modified: 24 Feb 2011 17:22 GMT
Email Article
Email Article
Print Article
Print Article
Share article
Share Article
Send Feedback
Send Feedback

Muhammad al-Senussi, who would be Libya’s crown prince if the country still had a monarchy, has spoken out about the ongoing violence in the country from London.

Libya was a monarchy until Muammar Gaddafi took power in a military coup in 1969 and the exiled King Idris has long since died.

In this interview with Al Jazeera's Barnaby Phillips, al-Senussi asks the international community to help remove Gaddafi from power and stop the ongoing "massacre".

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-22/libya-s-crown-prince-says-protesters-will-defy-brutal-forces-.html
Libya’s Crown Prince Says Protesters Will Defy ‘Brutal Forces’
By Vivian Salama - Feb 22, 2011

Muhammad bin Sayyid Hassan as- Senussi, who would be Libya’s crown prince if the country still had a monarchy, said the people who were “killed by the brutal forces” of President Muammar Qaddafi are “heroes” and that their struggle will soon be victorious.

Qadaffi’s “fight to stay in power will not last long, because of the desire for freedom by the Libyan people,” Senussi, whose great-uncle King Idris was overthrown by Qaddafi in 1969, said in an e-mailed statement from London today. He called upon the international community “to halt all support for the dictator with immediate effect.”

Qaddafi’s crackdown on a week-long uprising, inspired by protests that overthrew the leaders of Tunisia and Egypt, has left more than 200 dead as regime supporters fired on demonstrators in Tripoli, according to Human Rights Watch. Libya’s royal family, which was for a period held under house arrest by Qaddafi, emigrated to the U.K. in 1988, according to the statement.

“I send my condolences for the heroes who have laid down their lives, killed by the brutal forces of Qaddafi,” the 48- year-old Senussi said. “The Libyan people have now chosen to challenge this regime peacefully until it is gone from Libya, and the people will not return to their homes until justice is delivered.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Vivian Salama in Cairo at vsalama@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew J. Barden at barden@bloomberg.net

http://www.workers.org/2011/editorials/demonizing_gadhafi_0310/
Behind the demonizing of Gadhafi
Published Mar 2, 2011 4:50 PM

Africa continues to be the most underdeveloped continent, despite having the world’s most abundant mineral wealth.

The United States in 1847 created Liberia as a place to send freed African-American slaves. Eventually it became the biggest rubber plantation in the world. In the late 19th century, most of the rest of Africa was carved up by the European colonial powers, including Germany, Britian, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France and Belgium. By the time of World War I, Africa was nothing more than a gigantic plantation, with hundreds of millions of African peoples made into virtual slaves and their resources ripped off to help enrich European and U.S. capitalists.

After World War II, anti-colonial struggles spread like wildfire throughout Africa, bringing forth dynamic African leaders at the head of campaigns for independence and sovereignty from their former colonial oppressors. These heroic leaders included Patrice Lumumba, Amilcar Cabral, Samora Machel and Kwame Nkrumah.

Libya had been an Italian colony until Italy’s defeat in World War II. After the war, the U.S. and Britain set up a monarchy in Libya under King Idris I. Moammar al-Gadhafi was a military officer when he led a coup in 1969 against the monarchy. This led to the nationalization of Libya’s oil and social gains for the Libyan people.

In recent years, however, U.S. sanctions and military aggression against the Gadhafi regime led the government to make concessions and agree to austerity measures demanded by imperialist banks, all of which fueled unrest in the population.

On top of this growing imperialist intervention and pressure, the capitalist media are carrying out a vicious, vindictive campaign against Gadhafi, characterizing him in demonizing, racist terms like “mad dog.” Such terms are never used to describe former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak or other U.S. puppets in the Arab world, from Saudi Arabia to Jordan to Bahrain.

The U.S. has imposed sanctions on President Gadhafi and his family’s bank accounts; by contrast, the U.S. did not impose similar sanctions on Mubarak and his reported $70 billion in bank accounts. While President Barack Obama has publicly called for Gadhafi to step down from office, he treated Mubarak with kid gloves before the resolve of the Egyptian masses forced Mubarak to leave office.

The racist, hostile treatment of Gadhafi is not an isolated example. Another African leader who has been demonized in a comparable manner is Robert Mugabe, president of Zimbabwe. Unlike Gadhafi, Mugabe has been the leader of a national liberation movement, ZANU-PF. Mugabe forced Britain, the colonial oppressor, to the bargaining table in 1979 to work out an agreement in which Britain would subsidize the giving back to African war veterans of millions of acres of land stolen by white farmers. But Britain didn’t live up to the agreement. When Mugabe kept his promise to these freedom fighters by seizing the land, the U.S. and British governments in 2000 imposed genocidal sanctions on the Zimbabwean economy and also sought to isolate Mugabe with a prolonged character assassination. They called him a “tyrant” and “despot” and accused him of starving his people — when the real culprits were “structural adjustment” measures imposed by the IMF, along with periods of severe drought.

The Western imperialists have also made every effort to demonize President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan while funding secessionist movements in the oil-rich South and West of the country, imposing sanctions and bringing criminal charges against him in the International Criminal Court.

It is the right of any oppressed people to oppose and organize against their leaders if basic needs and rights are not being met. It is not the right of imperialist governments to manipulate, exploit and outright intervene in the internal affairs of another country while personally and politically demonizing their leaders. This is a violation of the basic right to self-determination.

There have been reports from news sources, including Al Jazeera, that low-waged migrants from Chad, Niger and other sub-Saharan African countries working in Libya have been physically attacked and accused of being “mercenaries” hired by Gadhafi. These attacks are being carried out by anti-Gadhafi forces who are receiving backing from the West.

The imperialists don’t care about any suffering of the Libyan people but will do what they deem in their interests to gain control of the oil that Libya possesses. The people of Libya don’t need imperialist intervention; they need and deserve reparations from imperialist banks and governments that have held back real economic development and political independence on a continent that has been severely abused for centuries, beginning with the devastating slave trade.

It is imperative that the progressive movement in the U.S. take up the clarion call of getting imperialism off the backs of the African people by intensifying the class struggle here. This is what real solidarity is all about.
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

http://www.facebook.com/pahlavireza?sk=notes#!/event.php?eid=198850453466684¬if_t=event_invite
Time
Sunday, March 6 at 1:00pm - May 31 at 4:00pm
Created By
هواداران شاهزاده رضا پهلوی, Persia Press
More Info
From Iran's different faiths, ethnic groups and social sectors, from the left to the right of the political spectrum, from my brave countrymen and women struggling for human dignity and freedom, this is the message I carry to you: As you face our oppressors, do not turn your back to us. We are your best friends in the struggle against a common enemy, the enemy of peace on earth. Reza Pahlavi

Join Official page of Reza Pahlavi
at following link
http://www.facebook.com/pahlavireza?ref=ts&sk=wall#!/pahlavireza?sk=info

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Did lincoln chafee rig the election?

Last year I expounded on why Frank Caprio lost the RI Governor’s race. In doing so I went over one key factor, election rigging. Of all his opponents one of them had the means to do this, lincoln chafee.

In looking at the election results two glaring inconsistencies stick out tho those who are in the state. The first is that Caprio lost his home precinct in providence’s federal hill neighborhood, the second was that lincoln chafee got a similar amount of votes in Newport as the democrat candidate for Congress in that district. While to an outsider this may seem normal all one has to do is talk to someone who lives and works in those neighborhoods it would sem ridiculous. In the first case Caprio is immensly popular in federal hill, and in newport the democratic candidate is immensly hated. If this is the case then it gives credence that rigging may have been involved.

While chafee may have been independent of political parties he was not independent of money, and during the time he was at the watson institute he came under the influence of the same people who funded acorn, and I should not have to mention the role acorn has played in rigging elections since 2008, mainly through voter intimidation and packing polls with their people to help ensure an outcome to their liking. Consider how the democratic candidate in the race mentioned above was also backed by acorn, and that chafee backed the 2008 presidential candidate who acorn backed.

He also dealt with people who had experience rigging elections, including former Brazilian president cardoso. While at watson cardoso published in his memoirs, and in them he mentions how once he was elected president two of the first things he did was to make voting mandatory for every citizen, and to make all voting electronic, thus making it easier to manipulate an election, as there are no paper ballots, or people to count them. In addition there were people from special interest gropus, be they zionist, latino, lgbt, Marxist, and various other government backed provaceturs who would all owe chafee favors were he to become governor.

One can argue whether or not chafee rigged the election, the bottom line is that he had the means to rig the election, and the people he knew who could rig the election had every reason to put him in for their own benefit. While lincoln chafee may have won the race, by hook or crook, and may be the new governor of RI he did so at great cost to himself and others. In his campaign he appealed to conservatives who were loyal to his family and to liberals and other radicals who’s views he claimed to share. In doing this he helped hasten the split in the democratic party caused by acorn. In the long term by becoming the governor as he did lincoln chafee has set things up for future conflict with the people of RI, be it political or physical.

From my Archiv, my July 2009 dialouge with reza pahlavi

I pulled this out of my Archiv, this is the exact copy of a myspace conversation I had with reza pahlavi in July 2009 which I also e-mailed to reza and Shahbanou farah.


* From: "Peter Khan Zendran"
* To: fpahlavi@hotmail.com, rpsec@rezapahlavi.org
* Subject: My response to reza pahlavi staff on myspace
* Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:31:03 -0400

Man am Khan-e-Mazendaran and I do NOT appreciate ANYONE questioning my
heritage or my right to be involved in what is going on in Iran. Also I
have recieved a message that reza pahlavi has control over this page of
yours and that what is put up there is approved by him.
If there is any source of chaos in Iran is is thanks to actions by
people like reza pahlavi which I have detailed extensively. The "sea of
green" which has been quashed in Iran and is flickering out of Iran is
one which was created by cia mi6, cfr, and those who collaborate with
them and one that threatens Iran. The evil that is democracy was forced
on iran by inglisi e rusi to weaken Iran, and now amrika e zionism use
it to menace Iran further, and any Iranian who backs it is TRAITOR.
JAVID IRAN, MARG BAR AMRIKA.
Peter II, Khan-e-Mazendaran




----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: H.I.M. Prince Reza Pahlavi
To: Peter Khan
Date: Jul 26, 2009 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: Open letter to reza pahlavi


HEY,
please leave iran and iranian people alone in their own ways ,you and
people like you just do a chaos and discord with your false idea and
words in between .now iranaian people need more to alliance and our
Prince who was exiled out by these people with his family from iran in
very bad form now is strongly back to help for freedom in iran ,he had
enough activity befor this as well ,his life is now in his hand , time
was not ready befor but iranian people now are awake.
and he forgot all those bad treat that iranians did with his family in
1979 and he is backed for us as he was with us all times, we appreciate
it!
now all the good and bads in befor is passed away and we look to the
future...
i ask you now in this period of time to help this green freedom activity
of iranian people as you can IF YOU ARE INTERESTED or leave us alone
,thank you.

FREE IRAN !
http://www.peterkhanzendran.com
http://peterkhanzendran.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/peterkhanzendran
http://www.youtube.com/user/PeterKhanZendran
http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter_Khan_Zendran/1390262333
http://peterkhanzendran.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/peterzendran
"History will burden those leaders with blood guilt if they do not act
according to their professional and statesmanely principles and knowledge.
Their soldierly loyalty must end at the boundary where their knowledge,
conscience, and sense of responsibility forbid the execution of an order. In
case their advice and warnings fall on deaf ears in such circumstances, then
they have the right and the duty, before the people and history, to resign
their offices. If they all act together, then it will be impossible to carry
out military action. They will thereby saved the Fatherland from the worst,
from total ruin. If a soldier in a position of highest authority in such
times see his duties and tasks only within the limits of his military
responsibilities, without consciousness of his higher responsibility to the
whole people, then he shows a lack of greatness, a lack of comprehension of
responsibility. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary actions!"
Generaloberst Ludwig Beck

--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...

Wednesday, March 09, 2011

My conversations with niac on Iran situation

Below is an exact transcript of an online conversation I had with nobar elmi on the situation in Iran. What niac does NOT understand that calls for action in the name of upholding human rights is just another justification for invading Iran, and that the so-called human rights abuses are often unsubstantiated and for Iranians to handle, not for foreign powers to meddle in.



From:"Peter Khan Zendran"
To:"Nobar Elmi"
Date:Mon, 7 Mar 2011 4:44 PM (2 days ago)
Your response is delusional. The call for human rights is being promoted to justify invasion. Unless you're living under a rock you would have noticed the us military has increased it's presence in the Middle east after the unrest in Egypt, Bahrain and Libya in the name of human rights, and an attack is in all probability imminent.
Furthermore, I recieved your response about the"green movement" it is a pack of lies. Had you checked my blogs and links you would have seen that I and others have shown that the "green movement" is backed by the council on foreign relations and the cia.
If you are going to put out these lies and myth then do NOT send me your gohenahang.
Peter Khan Zendran



On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:31 -0500, "Nobar Elmi" wrote:
The case for war is already being pushed by the ‘pro-war’ elements on the Hill. (Believe me … they are very active and very loud.) We can either remain quiet and let them work their magic OR we can promote the alternative to war by emphasizing the importance of and need for human rights. We’re taking steps to ensure human rights is on the table, by doing things such as working to ensure there is an independent UN human rights monitor and encouraging the dialogue.

-Nobar

From: Peter Khan Zendran [mailto:peterkhanzendran@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 4:21 PM
To: Nobar Elmi
Subject: RE: Invite: Answering the Iranian People's Call for Human Rights

What you are ignoring is that by slamming Iran for human rights violations you are making the inevatibility of war, be it with america, israel, or a civil war, inevitable. The niac principles on human rights are contradictory and lay the foundation for further conflict, not settlement. You can't have it both ways here.
Peter Khan Zendran

On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:15 -0500, "Nobar Elmi" wrote:
Hello Peter,

NIAC works very hard to emphasize that politicians cannot be in favor of human rights in Iran while simultaneously in favor of war or “crippling” sanctions. See this NIAC op-ed in the Huffington Post, for example: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shawn-amoei/neocon-war-plans-undermin_b_679783.html

Our efforts, and specifically this conference, is intended to promote a discussion on the constructive steps that can be taken to promote human rights while expressing a strong opposition to war.

To pull directly from our website:
NIAC's Principles on Human Rights
•Human rights must be protected as part of any final negotiated settlement between the US and Iran. •Military confrontation with Iran must be prevented because war is the ultimate human rights disaster.•We must continue to draw attention to human rights violations in Iran and ensure the Iranian government is held accountable for its actions.It is up to the pro-peace community to emphasize that human rights and peace are reinforcing values. If our community doesn’t speak up, Members of Congress - and the community at large - will only hear from the other side.

I hope this helps clarify our position.

Regards,
Nobar


From: Peter Khan Zendran [mailto:peterkhanzendran@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 3:56 PM
To: Nobar Elmi, NIAC
Subject: Re: Invite: Answering the Iranian People's Call for Human Rights

I am wondering if niac and the speakers are aware that they are using "human rights" in the same way "weapons of mass destruction" was used 8 years ago.
Peter Khan Zendran



On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:15 -0600, "Nobar Elmi, NIAC" wrote:

Dear Friend,
You are invited to NIAC’s March 15 Capitol Hill conference, Answering the Iranian People’s Call for Human Rights, featuring Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Suzanne Nossel, Swedish Ambassador Jonas Hafström, Congressional Progressive Caucus Chairman Keith Ellison (D-MN), and Nazila Fathi of the New York Times. The conference will examine a productive international approach necessary to address Iran's human rights crisis and provide needed space for Iran's democracy movement, and will highlight critical efforts underway to establish a UN human rights monitor for Iran this March.
I hope you can join us for this great event. Space is limited so please RSVP by Friday, March 11. We are also planning to webcast the event for those who are unable to attend in person.
Sincerely,
Nobar Elmi
Director of Community Outreach & Programming




Answering the Iranian People's Call for Human Rights
Tuesday, March 15th 2011
Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, DC 20005
8:30a.m. – 1:00p.m. EST
RSVP Here
With Special Addresses by:














Suzanne Nossel
U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations



Ambassador Jonas Hafström
Ambassador of Sweden to the United States



Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN)
Original Sponsor of Stand with Iranian People Act



Nazila Fathi
Former New York Times correspondent based in Iran





A Panel Discussion:
The Human Rights Crisis and Iran’s Democracy Movement










Nader Hashemi
Co-Editor of The People Reloaded: The Green Movement and the Struggle for Iran's Future
Alireza Nader
International Policy Analyst,
Rand Corporation
Sarah Leah Whitson
Middle East and North Africa Director,
Human Rights Watch






Breakfast and Refreshments will be served.
RSVP ONLY by March 11th – RSVP Here
(http://www.niacouncil.org/hrconference)
Priority given to Members of Congress, Staff, & Accredited Media
For more information email lsamimi@niacouncil.org or call (202) 386-6325
Sponsored by Connect U.S. Fund, Ploughshares Fund, and Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
The views of the aforementioned individuals are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Iranian American Council.

National Iranian American Council | 1411 K Street NW, Suite 600 | Washington, DC 20005




Nobar Elmi
Director of Community Outreach & Programming
__________________________
National Iranian American Council
1411 K St. NW Ste. 600
Washington, DC 20005
ph: (202) 386-6325
Web: www.niacouncil.org
Blog: FastMail.FM WARNING: URL text and host don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. Original URL='http://www.niacouncil.org/site/R?i=uEp7e_Odvp71-af6ZeQP5g..'. Original text='www.niacINsight.com'. For more information on phishing click
Facebook: FastMail.FM WARNING: URL text and host don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. Original URL='http://www.niacouncil.org/site/R?i=7poVw77k9OIvm9vcNGQINg..'. Original text='facebook.com/niacouncil'. For more information on phishing click
Donate: www.niacouncil.org/donate
here.here.Opt-out from all emails from NIAC

nonprofit software
http://www.peterkhanzendran.com
http://peterkhanzendran.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/peterkhanzendran
http://www.youtube.com/user/PeterKhanZendran
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Peter-II-Khan-e-Mazendaran/162268670462744
http://peterkhanzendran.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/peterzendran
"History will burden those leaders with blood guilt if they do not act according to their professional and statesmanely principles and knowledge. Their soldierly loyalty must end at the boundary where their knowledge, conscience, and sense of responsibility forbid the execution of an order. In case their advice and warnings fall on deaf ears in such circumstances, then they have the right and the duty, before the people and history, to resign their offices. If they all act together, then it will be impossible to carry out military action. They will thereby saved the Fatherland from the worst, from total ruin. If a soldier in a position of highest authority in such times see his duties and tasks only within the limits of his military responsibilities, without consciousness of his higher responsibility to the whole people, then he shows a lack of greatness, a lack of comprehension of responsibility. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary actions!"
Generaloberst Ludwig Beck


--

http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
http://www.peterkhanzendran.com
http://peterkhanzendran.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/peterkhanzendran
http://www.youtube.com/user/PeterKhanZendran
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Peter-II-Khan-e-Mazendaran/162268670462744
http://peterkhanzendran.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/peterzendran
"History will burden those leaders with blood guilt if they do not act according to their professional and statesmanely principles and knowledge. Their soldierly loyalty must end at the boundary where their knowledge, conscience, and sense of responsibility forbid the execution of an order. In case their advice and warnings fall on deaf ears in such circumstances, then they have the right and the duty, before the people and history, to resign their offices. If they all act together, then it will be impossible to carry out military action. They will thereby saved the Fatherland from the worst, from total ruin. If a soldier in a position of highest authority in such times see his duties and tasks only within the limits of his military responsibilities, without consciousness of his higher responsibility to the whole people, then he shows a lack of greatness, a lack of comprehension of responsibility. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary actions!"
Generaloberst Ludwig Beck
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...http://www.peterkhanzendran.com
http://peterkhanzendran.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/peterkhanzendran
http://www.youtube.com/user/PeterKhanZendran
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Peter-II-Khan-e-Mazendaran/162268670462744
http://peterkhanzendran.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/peterzendran
"History will burden those leaders with blood guilt if they do not act according to their professional and statesmanely principles and knowledge. Their soldierly loyalty must end at the boundary where their knowledge, conscience, and sense of responsibility forbid the execution of an order. In case their advice and warnings fall on deaf ears in such circumstances, then they have the right and the duty, before the people and history, to resign their offices. If they all act together, then it will be impossible to carry out military action. They will thereby saved the Fatherland from the worst, from total ruin. If a soldier in a position of highest authority in such times see his duties and tasks only within the limits of his military responsibilities, without consciousness of his higher responsibility to the whole people, then he shows a lack of greatness, a lack of comprehension of responsibility. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary actions!"
Generaloberst Ludwig Beck
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be

Saturday, March 05, 2011

Major blunder by niac on Iranian affairs

Recently the national Iranian American council has chosen to go along with calling for human rights monitoring in Iran, using the detention of mousavi and karroubi as a justification. For an organization that claims to represent and protect Iranians this is hypocrisy for.
1. It gives a justification for military/subversive action against Iran, like the kind that was successful in Egypt, what is going in Libya, Bahrain, and Yemen, and what failed in Jordan.
2. Both mousavi and karroubi were responsible for the worst human rights violations that were committed when they served in the Iranian government under khomeini, and have connections with the cia, and were both to be put in power Iran would go the way of Iraq and Yugoslavia. What people also forget is that Malaysia has done the same thing with politicians who have threatened the safety of people, and risk condemnation to gain safety.
If anyone believes that niac is acting in the name of human rights then they believe in the tooth fairy.